Race, Space, and Violence: Exploring Spatial Dependence in Structural Covariates of White and Black Violent Crime in US Counties
- 1.1k Downloads
To join the literature on spatial analysis with research testing the racial invariance hypothesis by examining the extent to which claims of racial invariance are sensitive to the spatial dynamics of community structure and crime.
Using 1999–2001 county-level arrest data, we employ seemingly unrelated regression models, spatial lag models, and geographically weighted regression analyses to (1) compare the extent of racial similarity/difference across these different modeling procedures, (2) evaluate the impact of spatial dependence on violent crime across racial groups, and (3) explore spatial heterogeneity in associations between macro-structural characteristics and violent crime.
Results indicate that spatial processes matter, that they are more strongly associated with white than black violent crime, and that accounting for space does not significantly attenuate race-group differences in the relationship between structural characteristics (e.g., structural disadvantage) and violent crime. Additionally, we find evidence of significant variation across space in the relationships between county characteristics and white and black violent crime, suggesting that conclusions of racial invariance/variation are sensitive to where one is looking. These results are robust to different specifications of the dependent variable as well as different units of analysis.
Our study suggests the racial invariance debate is not yet settled. More importantly, our study has revealed an additional level of complexity—race specific patterns of spatially heterogeneous effects—that future research on social structure and racial differences in violence should incorporate both empirically and theoretically.
KeywordsRacial invariance Violent crime Spatial econometrics Spatial heterogeneity
We would like to thank Darrell Steffensmeier, Stephen Matthews, Jeffrey Ulmer, Michael Massoglia, Luke Bonkiewicz and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
- Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Anselin L, Cohen J, Cook D, Gorr W, Tita G (2000) Spatial analyses of crime. In: Duffee D (ed) Criminal justice 2000, vol 4: Measurement and analyses of crime and justice. National Institute of Justice, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Block CR, Block RL (1992) Homicide syndromes and vulnerability: violence in Chicago community areas over 25 years. Stud Crime Crime Prev 1:61–87Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) National vital statistics and mortality data (Mortality Multiple Cause-of-Death Public Use Record 2000). National Center for Health Statistics, HayattsvilleGoogle Scholar
- Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Johnston RJ, Gregory D, Hagget P, Smith D, Stoddart DR (1981) The dictionary of human geography. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
- Krivo L, Peterson R (1996) Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Soc Forces 75:619–650Google Scholar
- Lane R (1986) Roots of violence in Black Philadelphia, 1860–1900. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lobao LM, Hooks G, Tickamyer AR (eds) (2007) The sociology of spatial inequality. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Messner SF, Anselin L (2004) Spatial analyses of homicide with areal data. In: Goodchild MF, Janelle DG (eds) Best practices in spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 127–144Google Scholar
- Messner SF, Rosenfeld R (1999) Social structure and homicide: theory and research. In: Smith MD, Zahn M (eds) Homicide studies: a sourcebook of social research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 27–41Google Scholar
- Mosher CJ, Miethe TD, Hart TC (2010) The mismeasure of crime, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Openshaw S (1983) The modifiable areal unit problem CATMOG 38. GeoBooks, NorwichGoogle Scholar
- Ousey G (2000) Explaining regional and urban variation in crime: a review of research. Crim Justice 1:261–308Google Scholar
- Park R, Burgess EW, McKenzie RD (1925) The city. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Parker K (2008) Unequal crime decline: theorizing race, urban inequality and criminal violence. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Peterson R, Krivo L (2010) Divergent social worlds: neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Pattillo-McCoy M (1999) Black picket fences: privilege and peril among the Black middle class. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Sampson R, Bean L (2006) Cultural mechanisms and killing fields: a revised theory of community-level racial inequality. In: Peterson RD, Krivo LJ, Hagan J (eds) The many colors of crime. New York University Press, New York, pp 8–36Google Scholar
- Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD (2004) Spatial (dis)advantage and homicide in chicago neighborhoods. In: Goodchild MF, Janelle DG (eds) Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sampson R, Wilson WJ (1995) Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In: Hagan J, Peterson R (eds) Crime and inequality. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 177–187Google Scholar
- Shaw C, McKay H (1942) Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Ward MD, Gleditsch KS (2008) Spatial regression models. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar