Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 533–557 | Cite as

Scaling Criminal Offending

  • Gary SweetenEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective:

This paper reviews a century of research on creating theoretically meaningful and empirically useful scales of criminal offending and illustrates their strengths and weaknesses.

Methods:

The history of scaling criminal offending is traced in a detailed literature review focusing on the issues of seriousness, unidimensionality, frequency, and additivity of offending. Modern practice in scaling criminal offending is measured using a survey of 130 articles published in five leading criminology journals over a two-year period that included a scale of individual offending as either an independent or dependent variable. Six scaling methods commonly used in contemporary criminological research are demonstrated and assessed using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979: dichotomous, frequency, weighted frequency, variety, summed category, and item response theory ‘theta’.

Results:

The discipline of criminology has seen numerous scaling techniques introduced and forgotten. While no clearly superior method dominates the field today, the most commonly used scaling techniques are dichotomous and frequency scales, both of which are fraught with methodological pitfalls including sensitivity to the least serious offenses.

Conclusions:

Variety scales are the preferred criminal offending scale because they are relatively easy to construct, possess high reliability and validity, and are not compromised by high frequency non-serious crime types.

Keywords

Crime scales Item response theory Variety scales 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Erin Sweeten, Shawn Bushway, Denise Gottfredson, John Laub, Ray Paternoster, Mike Reisig, Scott Decker, the editors of this journal, and three anonymous reviewers for valuable guidance in the development of this paper.

References

  1. Arnold WR (1965) Continuities in research: scaling delinquent offending. Soc Probl 13:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beccaria C (1764) On crimes and punishment. (trans. H. Paolucci). Bobbs-Merrill, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk R, MacDonald JM (2008) Overdispersion and poisson regression. J Quant Criminol 24:269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blakely CH, Kushler MG, Parisian JA, Davidson WS II (1980) Self-reported delinquency as an evaluation measure: Comparative reliability and validity of alternative weighting schemes. Crim Justice Behav 7:369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumstein A (1974) Weights in an index of crime. Am Sociol Rev 39:854–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumstein A, Cohen J, Roth J, Visher C (eds) (1986) Criminal careers and “career criminals”, vol 1. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt C (1925) The young delinquent. University of London Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiricos T, Barrick K, Bales W, Bontrager S (2007) The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology 45:547–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark WW (1922) Whittier scale for grading juvenile offenses. California Bureau of Juvenile Research, WhittierGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen MA (1988) Some new evidence on the seriousness of crime. Criminology 26:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen MA, Rust RT, Steen S, Tidd ST (2004) Willingness-to-pay for crime control programs. Criminology 42:89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dentler RA, Monroe LJ (1961) Social correlates of early adolescent theft. Am Sociol Rev 26:733–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durea MA (1933) An experimental study of attitudes toward juvenile delinquency. J Appl Psychol 17:522–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elifson KW, Petersen DM, Hadaway CK (1983) Religiosity and delinquency: a contextual analysis. Criminology 21:505–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott DS (1982) Measuring delinquency (book review). Criminology 20:527–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott DS, Ageton SS (1980) Self-reported and official estimates of delinquency. Am Sociol Rev 45:95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott DS, Huizinga D, Ageton SS (1985) Explaining delinquency and drug use. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliott DS, Huizinga D, Menard S (1989) Multiple problem youth: delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. Springer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Farrington DP (1973) Self-reports of deviant behavior: predictive and stable? J Crim Law Criminol 64:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farrington DP, Coid JW, Harnett LM, Jolliffe D, Soteriou N, Turner RE, and West DJ (2006) Criminal careers up to age 50 and life success up to age 48: new findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. 2nd Ed. Home Office Research Study No. 299, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Francis B, Soothill K, Dittrich R (2001) A new approach for ranking ‘serious’ offences: the use of paired-comparisons methodology. British J Criminol 41:726–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frankel MR, McWilliams HA, and Spencer BD (1983) National longitudinal survey of labor force behavior, youth survey (NLS): technical sampling report. NLSY User Services, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  23. Giordano PC, Longmore MA, Schroeder RD, Seffrin PM (2008) A life-course perspective on spirituality and desistance from crime. Criminology 46:99–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gold M (1966) Undetected delinquent behavior. J Res Crim Delinq 13:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goring C (1913) The english convict. His Majesty’s Printing Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Gorsuch JH (1938) A scale of seriousness of crimes. J Crim Law Criminol 29:245–252Google Scholar
  27. Guttman L (1944) A basis for scaling qualitative data. Am Sociol Rev 9:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guttman L (1947) The cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis. Educ Psychol Measur 7:247–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckman JT, Ichimura H, Todd P (1998) Matching as an evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud 65:261–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hindelang MJ, Hirschi T, Weis JG (1979) Correlates of delinquency: the illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. Am Sociol Rev 44:995–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hindelang MJ, Hirschi T, Weis JG (1981) Measuring delinquency. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirschi T (1969) Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  33. Hirschi T, Selvin HC (1967) Delinquency research: an appraisal of analytic methods. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Huizinga D, Elliott DS (1986) Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures. J Quant Criminol 2:293–327Google Scholar
  35. Jennings WG, Schreck CJ, Sturtz M, Mahoney M (2008) Exploring the scholarly output of academic organization leadership in criminology and criminal justice: a research note on publication productivity. J Crim Justice Education 19:404–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kazemian L, Le Blanc M (2007) Differential cost avoidance and successful criminal careers. Random or Rational? Crime Delinq 53:38–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly DH, Winslow RW (1970) Seriousness of delinquent behavior: an alternative perspective. British J Criminol 10:124–135Google Scholar
  38. King RD, Massoglia M, MacMillan R (2007) The context of marriage and crime: gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology 45:33–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kleck G, Barnes JC (2011) Article productivity among the faculty of criminology and criminal justice doctoral programs, 2005–2009. J Crim Justice Education 22:43–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krohn MD, Thornberry TP, Gibson CL, Baldwin JM (2010) The development and impact of self-report measures of crime and delinquency. J Quant Criminol 26:509–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kulik JA, Stein KB, Sarbin TR (1968) Dimensions and patterns of adolescent antisocial behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol 32:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lessieur HR, Lehman PM (1975) Remeasuring delinquency: a replication and critique. British J Criminol 15:69–80Google Scholar
  43. Loftin C, McDowall D (2010) The use of official records to measure crime and delinquency. J Quant Criminol 26:527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lynch JP, Danner MJE (1993) Offense seriousness scaling: an alternative to scenario methods. J Quant Criminol 9:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McIver JP, Carmines EG (1981) Unidimensional scaling. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–024. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  46. Merton RK (1961) Social problems and sociological theory. In: Merton RK, Nisbet RA (eds) Contemporary social problems: an introduction to the sociology of deviant behavior. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, New York, pp 697–737Google Scholar
  47. Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Rutter M, Silva PA (2001) Sex differences in antisocial behavior: conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Monahan KC, Piquero AR (2009) Investigating the longitudinal relation between offending frequency and offending variety. Crim Justice Behav 36:653–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mursell GR (1932) A revision of whittier scale for grading juvenile offenses. Journal of Juvenile Research 3:246–250Google Scholar
  50. Nagin DS (2005) Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Nye FI, Short JF Jr (1957) Scaling delinquent behavior. Am Sociol Rev 22:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Orrick EA, Weir H (2011) The most prolific sole and lead authors in elite criminology and criminal justice journals, 2000–2009. J Crim Justice Education 22:24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Osgood DW, Schreck CJ (2007) A new method for studying the extent, stability, and predictors of individual specialization in violence. Criminology 45:273–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Osgood DW, Finken LL, McMorris BJ (2002a) Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. J Quant Criminol 18:319–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Osgood DW, McMorris BJ, Potenza MT (2002b) Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance I: item response theory scaling. J Quant Criminol 18:267–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Piquero AR, MacIntosh R, Hickman M (2002) The validity of a self-reported delinquency scale: Comparisons across gender, age, race, and place of residence. Sociol Meth Res 30:492–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Piquero NL, Carmichael S, Piquero AR (2008) Research note: assessing the perceived seriousness of white-collar and street crime. Crime Delinq 54:291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Porterfield AL (1943) Delinquency and its outcome in court and college. Am J Sociol 49:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Powers E, Witmer H (1951) An experiment in the prevention of delinquency. The cambridge-somerville youth study. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramchand R, MacDonald JM, Haviland A, Morral AR (2009) A developmental approach for measuring the severity of crimes. J Quant Criminol 25:129–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scott JF (1959) Two dimensions of delinquent behavior. Am Sociol Rev 24:240–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scott PD (1964) Approved school success rates. British J Criminol 4:525–556Google Scholar
  63. Sellin T, Wolfgang ME (1964) The measurement of delinquency. Patterson Smith, MontclairGoogle Scholar
  64. Sellin T, Wolfgang ME (1969) Measuring delinquency. In: Sellin T, Wolfgang ME (eds) Delinquency: selected studies. Wiley, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  65. Short JF Jr, Nye FI (1957) Reported behavior as a criterion of deviant behavior. Soc Probl 5:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Slawson J (1926) The delinquent boy. Gorham, BostonGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith DA, Brame R (2003) Tobit models in social science research: some limitations and a more general alternative. Sociol Meth Res 31:364–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sorensen J, Snell C, Rodriguez JJ (2006) An assessment of criminal justice and criminology journal prestige. J Crim Justice Education 17:297–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thurstone LL (1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev 34:273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tittle CR, Ward DA, Grasmick HG (2003) Self-control and crime/deviance: cognitive vs. behavioral measures. J Quant Criminol 19:333–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walker MA (1978) Measuring the seriousness of crimes. British J Criminol 18:348–364Google Scholar
  72. Wanderer JJ (1984) Scaling delinquent careers over time. Criminology 22:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warr M (1989) What is the perceived seriousness of crimes? Criminology 27:795–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weisburd D, Morris NA, Ready J (2008) Risk-focused policing at places: an experimental evaluation. Justice Q 25:163–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wellford CF, Wiatrowski M (1975) On the measurement of delinquency. J Crim Law Criminol 66:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wolfgang ME, Figlio RM, Sellin T (1972) Delinquency in a birth cohort. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  77. Wolfgang ME, Figlio RM, Tracy PE, Singer SI (1985) The national survey of crime severity. NCJ-96017. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  78. Wooldridge JM (2009) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 4th edn. South-Western, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations