Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 103–139 | Cite as

Estimating Country-Level Terrorism Trends Using Group-Based Trajectory Analyses: Latent Class Growth Analysis and General Mixture Modeling

Original Paper

Abstract

Recent criminological research has used latent class growth analysis (LCGA), a form of group-based trajectory analysis, to identify distinct terrorism trends and areas of high terrorism activity at the country-level. The current study contributes to the literature by assessing the robustness of recent findings generated by one type of group-based analysis, LCGA, to changes in measurement and statistical methodology. Using data from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD), we consider the challenges and advantages of applying group-based analysis to macro-level terrorism data. We summarize and classify country-level patterns of domestic and transnational terrorism using two types of group-based analyses, LCGA and an alternative yet similar modeling approach, general mixture modeling (GMM). We evaluate the results from each approach using both substantive and empirical criteria, highlighting the similarities and differences provided by both techniques. We conclude that both group-based models have utility for terrorism research, yet for the purposes of identifying hot spots of terrorist activity, LCGA results provide greater policy utility.

Keywords

Terrorism Country terrorism trends Group-based trajectory models Latent class growth analysis General mixture modeling Terrorist event concentration 

References

  1. Abadie A (2006) Poverty, political freedom, and the roots of terrorism. Am Econ Rev 96:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison PD (2002) Missing data series: quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage Publications, Thousands OaksGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk RA, MacDonald J (2008) Overdispersion and Poisson regression. J Quant Criminol 24:269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blomberg SB, Hess GD, Weerapana A (2004) An economic model of terrorism. Confl Manag Peace Sci 21:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brame R, Mulvey EP, Piquero AR (2001) On the development of different kinds of criminal activity. Sociol Methods Res 29:319–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgoon B (2006) On welfare and terror: social welfare and political-economic roots of terrorism. J Confl Resolut 50:176–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bushway SD, Sweeten G, Nieuwbeerta P (2009) Measuring long-term individual trajectories of offending using multiple methods. J Quant Criminol 25:259–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eggleston EP, Laub JH, Sampson RJ (2004) Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long term criminal trajectories. J Quant Criminol 20:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldman BJ, Masyn KE, Conger RD (2009) New approaches to studying problem behaviors: a comparison of methods for modeling longitudinal, categorical adolescent drinking data. Dev Psychol 45:652–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths E, Chavez JM (2004) Communities, street guns, and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980–1995: merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology 42:941–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall D (2000) Zero-inflated Poisson and binomial regression with random effects: a case study. Biometrics 56:1030–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffman B (1998) Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeffries NO (2003) A note on ‘testing the number of components in a normal mixture model’. Biometrika 90:991–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung T, Wickrama KAS (2008) An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 2(1):302–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koch MT, Cranmer S (2007) Testing the “Dick Cheney” hypothesis: do governments of the left attract more terrorism than governments of the right? Confl Manag Peace Sci 24:311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kreuter F, Muthén B (2008) Analyzing criminal trajectory profiles: bridging multilevel and group-based approaches using growth mixture modeling. J Quant Criminol 24:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LaFree G (1999) A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In: Smith MD, Zahn MA (eds) Homicide: a sourcebook of social research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 125–145Google Scholar
  18. LaFree G, Dugan L (2007) Introducing the global terrorism database. Terror Polit Violence 19:181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. LaFree G, Morris NA, Dugan L, Fahey S (2006) Identifying global terrorist hot spots. In: Victoroff J (ed) Tangled roots: social and psychological factors in the genesis of terrorism. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 98–114Google Scholar
  20. LaFree G, Yang SM, Crenshaw M (2009) Trajectories of terrorism: attack patterns of foreign groups that have targeted the United States, 1970 to 2004. Criminol Public Policy 8:445–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LaFree G, Morris NA, Dugan L (2010) Cross-national patterns of terrorism. Brit J Criminol 50:622–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Q (2004) Economic globalization and transnational terrorism: a pooled time-series analysis. J Confl Resolut 48:230–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Q, Schaub D (2005) Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? J Confl Resolut 49:278–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lo Y, Mendell N, Rubin D (2001) Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88:767–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publishing, Thousands OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Messner SF, Rosenfeld R (1999) Social structure and homicide: theory and research. In: Smith MD, Zahn MA (eds) Homicide: a sourcebook of social research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 27–41Google Scholar
  27. Moffitt TE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 100:674–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mullins CW, Young J (2009) Cultures of violence and acts of terror: applying a legitimation-habituation model to terrorism. Crime Delinquency (Online access: doi:10.1177/0011128710364807)
  29. Muthén B (2001) Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: new opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In: Collins LM, Sayer A (eds) New methods for the analysis of change. APA, Washington, DC, pp 291–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muthén B (2004) Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In: Kaplan D (ed) Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp 345–368Google Scholar
  31. Muthén B (2006) The potential of growth mixture modeling. Infant Child Dev 15:623–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muthén B, Asparouhov T (2006) Growth mixture analysis: models with non-Gaussian random effects. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (eds) Advances in longitudinal data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 143–165Google Scholar
  33. Muthén LK, Muthén B (1998–2010) Mplus user’s guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  34. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2006) Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables: user’s guide, 4th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagin DS (2004) Response to ‘‘Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories.’’ J Quant Criminol 20:26–37Google Scholar
  36. Nagin DS (2005) Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Nagin DS, Land KC (1993) Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology 31:327–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagin DS, Odgers CL (2010) Group-based modeling in clinical research. In: Nelen-Hoekland A, Cannon T, Widger T (eds) Annual review of clinical psychology. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 109–138Google Scholar
  39. Nagin DS, Farrington DP, Moffitt TE (1995) Life-course trajectories of different types of offenders. Criminology 33:111–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neapolitan JL (1996) Cross-national crime data: some unaddressed problems. J Crim Justice 19:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling 14:535–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Osgood W (2000) Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. J Quant Criminol 16:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Petras H, Masyn K (2010) General growth mixture models. In: Piquero A, Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of quantitative criminology. Springer, New York, pp 69–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piquero AR (2008) Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In: Liberman AM (ed) The long view of crime: a synthesis of longitudinal research. Springer, Washington, DC, pp 23–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piquero NL, Piquero AR (2006) Democracy and intellectual property: examining trajectories of software piracy. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci 605:104–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piquero AR, Blumstein A, Brame R, Haapanen R, Mulvey EP, Nagin DS (2001) Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. J Adolesc Res 16:54–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quetelet A (1984) Research on the propensity for crime at different ages. (Sylvester SF, Trans.) Anderson Publishing Co., Cincinnati (Original work published in 1831)Google Scholar
  48. Rapoport DC (2004) The four waves of modern terrorism. In: Cronin AK, Ludes JM (eds) Attacking terrorism: elements of a grand strategy. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 46–73Google Scholar
  49. Raudenbush SW (2005) How do we study what happens next? Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci 602:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roeder K, Lynch KG, Nagin DS (1999) Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: a case study in criminology. J Am Stat Assoc 94:766–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sampson RJ, Laub JH (2005) Seductions of method: rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay’s ‘developmental trajectory groups: fact or fiction’. Criminology 43:905–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sampson RJ, Laub J, Eggleston EP (2004) On the robustness and validity of groups. J Quant Criminol 20:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sandler T, Enders W (2007) Applying analytical methods to study terrorism. Int Stud Perspect 8:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmid AP, Jongman AJ (1988) Political terrorism: a new guide to actors, authors, concepts, databases, theories and literature. North-Holland Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaw CR, McKay HD (1942) Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago [1969]Google Scholar
  56. Shaw CR, Zorbaugh H, McKay HD, Cottrell LD (1929) Delinquency areas. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  57. Sherman LW, Weisburd D (1995) General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime ‘hot spots’: a randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quart 12:625–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Silke A (2005) Children, terrorism and counterterrorism: lessons in policy and practise. Terror Polit Violence 17:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stamatel JP (2009) Overcoming methodological challenges in international and comparative criminology: guest editor’s introduction. Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 33:167–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weisburd D, Bushway S, Lum C, Yang SM (2004) Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42:283–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weisburd D, Morris NA, Groff ER (2009) Hot spots of juvenile crime: a longitudinal study of street segments in Seattle, Washington. J Quant Criminol 25:443–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yang SM (2010) Assessing the spatial-temporal relationship between disorder and violence. J Quant Criminol 26:139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of MissouriSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations