Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 31–48 | Cite as

Space–Time Modeling of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq

Original Paper

Abstract

The US and its Coalition partners concluded combat operations in Iraq in August 2010. Rather surprisingly, little empirical evidence exists as to the factors that contributed to the ebb and flow in levels of violence and the emergence and disappearance of hot spots of hostilities during the campaign. Building upon a tradition of criminology scholarship, recent work demonstrates that Improvised Explosive Device (IED) attacks are clustered in space and time and that these trends decay in a manner similar to that observed in the spread of disease and crime. The current study extends this work by addressing a key potential correlate of these observed patterns across Iraq—namely, the timing and location of a variety of Coalition counterinsurgency (COIN) operations. This is achieved by assessing the co-evolving space–time distributions of insurgency and counterinsurgency in the first 6 months of 2005. To do so, we employ a novel analytic technique that helps us to assess the sequential relationship between these two event types. Our analyses suggest that the number of COIN operations that follow insurgent IED attacks (moderately) exceeds expectation (assuming that events are independent) for localities in the vicinity of an attack. This pattern is more consistent than is observed for the relationship in the opposite direction. The findings also suggest that less discriminatory COIN operations are associated with an elevated occurrence of subsequent insurgency in the vicinity of COIN operations in the medium to long term, whilst for more discriminatory and capacity-reducing COIN operations the reverse appears to be true.

Keywords

Insurgency Counterinsurgency Iraq Improvised Explosive Device (IED) SIGACTS Space-time modeling 

References

  1. Arce D, Sandler T (2005) Counterterrorism: a game-theoretic analysis. J Confl Resolut 49:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom M (2004) Palestinian suicide bombing: public support, market share, and outbidding. Polit Sci Quart 119:61–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohorquez JC, Gourley S, Dixon A, Spagat M, Johnson NF (2009) Common ecology quantifies human insurgency. Nature 462:911–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite A (2010) Conflict hotspots: emergence, causes, and consequences. Ashgate Press, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite A, Li Q (2007) Transnational terrorism hot spots: identification and impact evaluation. Confl Manag Peace Sci 24:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bueno de Mesquita E (2005a) Conciliation, counterterrorism, and patterns of terrorist violence. Int Organ 59:145–176Google Scholar
  8. Bueno de Mesquita E (2005b) The quality of terror. Am J Polit Sci 49:515–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bueno de Mesquita E (2007) Politics and the suboptimal provision of counterterror. Int Organ 61:9–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bueno de Mesquita E, Dickson E (2007) The propaganda of the deed: terrorism, counterterrorism, and mobilization. Am J Political Sci 51(2):364–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buhaug H, Rod JK (2006) Local determinants of African civil wars, 1970–2001. Polit Geogr 25:315–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of the Army, Headquarters (2007) Combined arms improvised explosive device defeat operations (FM 3-90.119/MCIP 3-17.01). Accessed online <http://www.us.army.mil>
  13. Faria JR, Arce D (2005) Terror support and recruitment. Def Peace Econ 16:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoffman B (2006) Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson S, Bowers K (2004) The burglary as a clue to the future: the beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. Eur J Criminol 1:235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson S, Braithwaite A (2009) Spatio-temporal distribution of insurgency in Iraq. In: Freilich J, Newman G (eds) Countering terrorism through SCP. Crime prevention studies, vol 25. Criminal Justice Press, New York, NY, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  17. Johnson S, Berdasco W, Bowers K, Elffers J, Ratcliffe J, Rengert G, Townsley M (2007) Space-time patterns of risk: a cross-national assessment of residential burglary victimization. J Quant Criminol 23:201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson S, Summers L, Pease K (2009) Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. J Quant Criminol 25:181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalyvas S (2006) The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Knox G (1964) Epidemiology of childhood leukaemia in Northumberland and Durham. Br J Prev Soc Med 18:17–24Google Scholar
  21. Kydd A, Walter B (2006) The strategies of terrorism. Int Secur 31:49–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LaFree G, Dugan L, Korte R (2009) The impact of British counter terrorist strategies on political violence in Northern Ireland: comparing deterrence and backlash models. Criminology 47:17–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LaFree G, Dugan L, Xie M, Singh P (2011) Spatial and temporal patterns of terrorist attacks by ETA 1970 to 2007. J Quant Criminol. doi:10.1007/s10940-011-9133-y
  24. Maoz Z (2007) Evaluating Israel’s strategy of low-intensity warfare, 1949–2006. Secur Stud 16:319–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) (2011) Global terrorism database [Data file]. Can be retrieved from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
  26. North BV, Curtis D, Sham PC (2002) A note on the calculation of empirical p values from Monte Carlo procedures. Am J Hum Genet 71:439–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pape RA (2003) The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Am Polit Sci Rev 97:343–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pape RA (2005) Dying to win. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosendorff BP, Sandler T (2004) Too much of good thing? The proactive response dilemma. J Confl Resolut 48:657–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryu A (2005) Roadside bombs cause increasing concern in Iraq. Voice of America. 28th SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  31. Sageman M (2004) Understanding terror networks. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Siquiera K, Sandler T (2007) Terrorist backlash, terrorism mitigation, and policy delegation. J Public Econ 91:1800–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Townsley MT, Johnson SD, Ratcliffe JR (2008) Space-time dynamics of insurgent activity in Iraq. Secur J 21:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkinson P (2001) Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal state response. Frank Cass, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Security and Crime ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations