Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 7–32 | Cite as

Is it Important to Examine Crime Trends at a Local “Micro” Level?: A Longitudinal Analysis of Street to Street Variability in Crime Trajectories

  • Elizabeth R. Groff
  • David Weisburd
  • Sue-Ming Yang
Original Paper


Over the last 40 years, the question of how crime varies across places has gotten greater attention. At the same time, as data and computing power have increased, the definition of a ‘place’ has shifted farther down the geographic cone of resolution. This has led many researchers to consider places as small as single addresses, group of addresses, face blocks or street blocks. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of the spatial distribution of crime have consistently found crime is strongly concentrated at a small group of ‘micro’ places. Recent longitudinal studies have also revealed crime concentration across micro places is relatively stable over time. A major question that has not been answered in prior research is the degree of block to block variability at this local ‘micro’ level for all crime. To answer this question, we examine both temporal and spatial variation in crime across street blocks in the city of Seattle Washington. This is accomplished by applying trajectory analysis to establish groups of places that follow similar crime trajectories over 16 years. Then, using quantitative spatial statistics, we establish whether streets having the same temporal trajectory are collocated spatially or whether there is street to street variation in the temporal patterns of crime. In a surprising number of cases we find that individual street segments have trajectories which are unrelated to their immediately adjacent streets. This finding of heterogeneity suggests it may be particularly important to examine crime trends at very local geographic levels. At a policy level, our research reinforces the importance of initiatives like ‘hot spots policing’ which address specific streets within relatively small areas.


Crime concentration Hot spots Micro Spatio-temporal 



This research was supported by grant 2005-IJ-CX-0006 from the National Institute of Justice (US Department of Justice). Points of view in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the US Department of Justice. We would like to thank Dan Nagin for his thoughtful suggestions regarding trajectory analysis, Richard Heiberger for his assistance with R programming, and Breanne Cave and the anonymous reviewers whose comments were invaluable in strengthening the paper. We also want to express our gratitude for the cooperation of the Seattle Police Department, and especially to Lieutenant Ron Rasmussen for playing the crucial role of our main data contact and former Chief Gil Kerlikowske (now Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy) for his interest in and support of our work.


  1. Aitken SC, Cutter SL, Foote KE, Sell JL (1989) Environmental perception and behavioral geography. In: Wilmott Gaile (ed) Geography in America. Columbus, Merrill, pp 218–238Google Scholar
  2. Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman Group Limited, EssexGoogle Scholar
  3. Baller RD, Anselin L, Messner Steven F, Deane G, Hawkins DF (2001) Structural covariates of US county homicide rates: incorporating spatial effects. Criminology 39:561–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumer EP, Lauritsen JL, Rosenfeld R, Wright R (1998) The influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary, and homicide rates: a cross-city, longitudinal analysis. J Res Crime Delinq 35:316–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boggs S (1965) Urban crime patterns. Am Sociol Rev 30:899–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braga AA (2001) The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 578:104–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braga AA, Papachristos AV, Hureau D (2009) The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. J Quant Criminol. doi: 10.1007/s10940-009-9082-x
  8. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1984) Patterns in crime. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1991) Environmental criminology. Waveland Press, Inc., Prospect Heights (1981)Google Scholar
  10. Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1993) Environment, routine, and situation: toward a pattern theory of crime. In: Clarke RV, Felson M (eds) Routine activity and rational choice, vol 5. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 259–294Google Scholar
  11. Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1995) Criminality of place: crime generators and crime attractors. Eur J Crim Pol Res 3:5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1999) Theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Stud Crime Crime Prev 8:7–26Google Scholar
  13. Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (2008) Crime analysis at multiple scales of aggregation: a topological approach. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in spatial crime research. Springer, New York, pp 87–108Google Scholar
  14. Brantingham PJ, Dyreson DA, Brantingham PL (1976) Crime seen through a cone of resolution. Am Behav Sci 20:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bursik RJJ, Grasmick HG (1993) Neighborhoods and crime: the dimensions of effective community control. Lexington Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Bursik RJJ, Webb J (1982) Community change and patterns of delinquency. Am J Soc 88:24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bushway SD, Thornberry TP, Krohn MD (2003) Desistance as a developmental process: a comparison of static and dynamic approaches. J Quant Criminol 19:129–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Byrne JM, Sampson RJ (eds) (1986) Social ecology of crime. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Chainey S, Tompson L, Uhlig S (2008) The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Secur J 21:4–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chakravorty S, Pelfrey WVJ (2000) Exploratory data analysis of crime patterns: preliminary findings from the Bronx. In: Goldsmith V, McGuire P, Mollenkopf G,JH, Ross TA (eds) Analyzing crime patterns: frontiers of practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 65–76Google Scholar
  21. Chilton RJ (1964) Continuity in delinquency area research: a comparison of studies for Baltimore, Detroit, and Indianapolis. Am Sociology Rev 29:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarke RV (1983) Situational crime prevention: its theoretical basis and practical scope. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice: an annual review of research, vol 14. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 225–256Google Scholar
  23. Clarke RV, Felson M (1993) Introduction: criminology, routine activity, and rational choice. In: Clarke RV, Felson M (eds) Routine activity and rational choice, vol 5. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  24. Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen J, Tita G (1999) Diffusion in homicide: exploring a general method for detecting spatial diffusion processes. J Quant Criminol 15:451–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cork D (1999) Examining space-time interaction in city-level homicide data: crack markets and the diffusion of guns among youth. J Quant Criminol 15:379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crow W, Bull J (1975) Robbery deterrence: an applied behavioral science demonstration—final report. Western Behavioral Science Institute, La JollaGoogle Scholar
  28. D’Unger AV, Land KC, McCall PL, Nagin DS (1998) How many latent classes of delinquent/criminal careers? Results form mixed poisson regression analysis. Am J Sociol 103:1593–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eck JE (1995) Examining routine activity theory: a review of two books. JQ 12:783–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eck JE, Weisburd D (1995) Crime places in crime theory. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place. Willow Tree Press, Monsey, NY, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  31. Eck JE, Chainey S, Cameron JG, Leitner M, Wilson RE (2005) Mapping crime: understanding hotspots. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Eggleston EP, Laub JH, Sampson RJ (2004) Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of longterm criminal trajectories. J Quant Criminol 20:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Felson M (1986) Predicting crime potential at any point on the city map. In: Figlio RM, Hakim S, Rengert GF (eds) Metropolitan crime patterns. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 127–136Google Scholar
  34. Felson M (1987) Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Criminology 25:911–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Felson M (2002) Crime in everyday life, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  36. Fotheringham AS, Brundson C, Charlton M (2000) Quantitative geography. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Gold JR (1980) An introduction to behavioural geography. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Golledge RG, Timmermans H (1990) Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems I: cognition. Prog Hum Geogr 14:57–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Griffiths E, Chavez JM (2004) Communities, street guns, and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980–1995: merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology 42:941–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Groff ER, LaVigne NG (2001) Mapping an opportunity surface of residential burglary. J Res Crime Delinq 38:257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Groff ER, Weisburd D, Morris N (2008) Where the action is at places: examining spatio-temporal patterns of juvenile crime at places using trajectory analysis and GIS. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in spatial crime research. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. Grubesic TH, Mack EA (2008) Spatio-temporal interaction of urban crime. J Quant Criminol 24:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guerry A-M (1833) Essai sur la Statisticque morale de la France. Crochard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  44. Hillier B (1999) The common language of space: a way of looking at the social, economic and environmental functioning of cities on a common basis. Retrieved February 17, 2004, from
  45. Hillier B (2004) Can streets be made safe? Urban Des Int 9:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Jefferis E (2004) Criminal places: a micro-level study of residential theft . Unpublished Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  48. Jeffery CR (1971) Crime prevention through environmental design. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson SD, Lab SP, Bowers KJ (2008) Stable and fluid hotspots of crime: differentiation and identification. Built Environ 34:32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones BL, Nagin DS, Roeder K (2001) A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol Methods Res 29:374–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaluzney SP, Vega SC, Cardoso TP, Shelly AA (1998) S+SpatialStats: users manual for Windows and UNIX. Insightful, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  52. Kinney JB, Brantingham PL, Wuschke K, Kirk MG, Brantingham PJ (2009) Crime attractors, generators and detractors: land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environ 34:62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kornhouser R (1978) Social sources of delinquency: an appraisal of analytic models. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  54. Kubrin CE, Herting JR (2003) Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: an analysis using growth-curve modeling. Sociol Quart 44:329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lab SP (2007) Crime prevention: approaches, practices, evaluations. Anderson Publishing, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  56. Lehoczky J (1986) Random parameter stochastic process models of criminal careers. In: Blumstein A, Cohen J, Roth JA, Visher CA (eds) Criminal careers and career criminals. National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Levine N (2005) CrimeStat: a spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations, vol 3.0. Ned Levine & Associates, Houston, TX and National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  58. Linnell D (1988) The geographic distribution of hot spots of robbery, rape, and auto theft in Minneapolis . Unpublished MA, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  59. Loftin C, Hill RH (1974) Regional subculture and homicide: an examination of the Gastil-Hackney thesis. Am Sociol Rev 39:714–724Google Scholar
  60. Maltz MD (1996) From Poisson to the present: applying operations research to problems of crime and justice. J Quant Criminol 12(1):3–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Merry SE (1981) Defensible space undefended: social factors in crime control through environmental design. Urban Aff Q 16:397–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Messner SF, Anselin L (2004) Spatial analysis of homicide with areal data. In: Goodchild MF, Janelle DG (eds) Spatially integrated social science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 127–144Google Scholar
  63. Moffitt TE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 100:674–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ (1997) Violent crime and the spatial dynamics of neighborhood transition: Chicago, 1970–1990. Soc Forces 76:31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nagin DS (1999) Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric group-based approach. Psychol Methods 4:139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nagin DS (2005) Group-based modeling of development over the life course. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Nagin DS, Land KC (1993) Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed poisson model. Criminology 31:327–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nagin DS, Farrington DP, Moffitt TE (1995) Life-course trajectories of different types of offenders. Criminology 33:111–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Newman O (1972) Defensible space: crime prevention through environmental design. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Oberwittler D, Wikstrom P-O (2008) Why small is better: advancing the study of the role of behavioral context in crime causation. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in spatial crime research, vol 35–60. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Osgood DW (2000) Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. J Quant Criminol 16(1):21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pierce G, Spaar S, Briggs LR (1986) The character of police work: strategic and tactical implications. Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University, BostonGoogle Scholar
  73. Potchak MC, McGloin JM, Zgoba KM (2002) A spatial analysis of criminal effort: auto theft in Newark, New Jersey. Crim Just Pol Rev 13:257–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Quetelet AJ (1831[1984]) Research on the propensity for crime at different ages (trans: Test Sylvester SF). Anderson Publishing Co, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  75. Ratcliffe JH (2004) Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 18:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Raudenbush SW (2001) Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data. Annu Rev Psychol 52:501–525Google Scholar
  77. Reiss A J Jr, Tonry M (1986) Preface. In: Reiss A J Jr, Tonry M (eds) Communities and crime. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  78. Rengert G, Lockwood B (2008) Geographical units of analysis and the analysis of crime. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in spatial crime research, vol 109–122. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. Robinson JB, Lawton BA, Taylor RB, Perkins DD (2003) Multilevel longitudinal impacts of incivilities: fear of crime, expected safety, and block satisfaction. J Quant Criminol 19:237–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roman CG (2002) Schools as generators of crime: routine activities and the sociology of place . Unpublished Dissertation, American University, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  81. Roncek DW (2000) Schools and crime. In: Goldsmith V, McGuire P, Mollenkopf G,JH, Ross TA (eds) Analyzing crime patterns: frontiers of practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 153–165Google Scholar
  82. Rowlingson BS, Diggle PJ (1993) Splancs: spatial point pattern analysis code in S-plus. Comput Geosci 19:627–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (1999) Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhood s. Am J Soc 105:603–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schuerman L, Kobrin S (1986) Community careers in crime. In: Reiss AJJ, Tonry M (eds) Communities and crime. University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 67–100Google Scholar
  85. Sherman LW (1995) Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In: Eck J, Weisburd DL (eds) Crime and place, vol 4. Willow Tree Press, MonseyGoogle Scholar
  86. Sherman LW, Weisburd D (1995) General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime `hot spots’: a randomized, controlled trial. JQ 12:625–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sherman LW, Gartin P, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Skogan WG (1986) Fear of crime and neighborood change. In: Reiss AJJ, Tonry M (eds) Communities and crime. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 203–230Google Scholar
  89. Smith WR, Frazee SG, Davison EL (2000) Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology 38:489–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spring JV, Block CR (1988) Finding crime hot spots: experiments in the identification of high crime areas. Paper presented at the Midwest Sociological SocietyGoogle Scholar
  91. Stark R (1987) Deviant places: a theory of the ecology of crime. Criminology 25:893–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Taylor RB (1997) Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. J Res Crime Delinq 34:113–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Taylor RB (1998) Crime and small-scale places: what we know, what we can prevent, and what else we need to know. In: Taylor RB, Bazemore G, Boland B, Clear TR, Corbett RPJ, Feinblatt J, Berman G, Sviridoff M, Stone C (eds) Crime and place: plenary papers of the 1997 conference on criminal justice research and evaluation, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  94. Taylor RB (2001) Breaking away from broken Windows: baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear and decline. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  95. Taylor RB, Gottfredson SD (1986) Enivronmental design, crime, and prevention: an examination of community dynamics. In: Reiss A J Jr, Tonry M (eds) Communities and crime. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 387–416Google Scholar
  96. Taylor RB, National Consortium on Violence Research (1999) A longitudinal look at the incivilities thesis: does disorder bring later crime and decline? Paper presented at the Eastern Sociological Association, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  97. Timmermans H, Golledge RG (1990) Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems II: preference and choice. Prog Hum Geogr 14:311–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. van Wilselm J (2008) Urban streets as micro contexts to commit violence. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in spatial crime research. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–216Google Scholar
  99. Walmsley DJ, Lewis GJ (1993) People and environment: behavioral approaches in human geography. Longman Scientific & Technical, EssexGoogle Scholar
  100. Weisburd D (2002) From criminals to criminal contexts: reorienting crime prevention. In: Waring E, Weisburd D (eds) Crime & social organization, vol 10. Transactions Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 197–216Google Scholar
  101. Weisburd D, Braga AA (2002) Hot spots policing. In: Kury H, Fuchs O (eds) Crime prevention: new approaches. Mainz, Germany, Weisner RingGoogle Scholar
  102. Weisburd D, Green L (1994) Defining the drug market: the case of the Jersey City DMA system. In: MacKenzie DL, Uchida CD (eds) Drugs and crime: evaluating public policy initiatives. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  103. Weisburd D, Green L (1995) Policing drug hot spots: the Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. JQ 12:711–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Weisburd D, Mazerolle L (2000) Drug hot spots and crime. Police Quart 3:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Weisburd D, McEwen T (1997) Introduction: crime mapping and crime prevention. In: Weisburd DL, McEwen T (eds) Crime mapping and crime prevention: crime prevention studies, vol 8. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  106. Weisburd D, Maher L, Sherman LW (1992) Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: the case of hot spots of crime. In: Adler F, Laufer WS (eds) Advances in criminological theory, vol 4. Transaction Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 45–70Google Scholar
  107. Weisburd D, Bushway S, Lum C, Yang S-M (2004a) Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42:283–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Weisburd D, Lum C, Yang S-M (2004b) The criminal careers of places: a longitudinal study. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  109. Weisburd D, Bruinsma G, Bernasco W (2008) Units of analysis in geographic criminology: historical development, critical issues and open questions. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in spatial crime research. Springer, New York, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  110. Weisburd D, Groff E, Yang S-M (2009a) Explaining developmental crime trajectories at places: a study of “crime waves” and “crime drops” at micro units of geography. National Institute of Justice, Washington DC (in progress)Google Scholar
  111. Weisburd D, Morris N, Groff ER (2009b) Hot spots of juvenile crime: a longitudinal study of street segments in Seattle, Washington. J Quant Criminol 24:443–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Weisburd D, Groff E, Yang S-M (under review) Understanding developmental crime trajectories at places: social disorganization and opportunity perspectives at micro units of geography. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  113. Wolfgang ME, Figlio RM, Sellin T (1972) Delinquency in a birth cohort. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth R. Groff
    • 1
  • David Weisburd
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sue-Ming Yang
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  3. 3.Administration of JusticeGeorge Mason UniversityManassasUSA
  4. 4.Criminal JusticeGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations