Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 285–306 | Cite as

Spatio-Temporal Interaction of Urban Crime

Original Paper

Abstract

Over the past decade, a renewed interest in the analysis of crime hot-spots has emerged in the social and behavioral sciences. Spurred by improvements in computing power, data visualization and geographic information systems, numerous innovative approaches have materialized for identifying areas of elevated crime in urban environments. Unfortunately, many hot-spot analysis techniques treat the spatial and temporal aspects of crime as distinct entities, thus ignoring the necessary interaction of space and time to produce criminal opportunities. The purpose of this paper is to explore the utility of statistical measures for identifying and comparing the spatio-temporal footprints of robbery, burglary and assault. Functional and visual comparisons for spatio-temporal clusters are analyzed across a range of space–time values using a comprehensive database of crime events for Cincinnati, Ohio. Empirical results suggest that robbery, burglary and assault have dramatically different spatio-temporal signatures.

Keywords

Crime hot spots Space–time GIS Cluster analysis 

References

  1. 3CDC (2006) Over-the-Rhine Rap Session 1. http://www.3cdc.org/otrrapsessions
  2. Aldstadt J (2007) An incremental Knox test for the determination of the serial interval between successive cases of an infectious disease. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21:487–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Block R, Block C (1995) Space, place and crime: hot spot areas and hot place of liquor-related crime. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place, vol 4. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY, pp 145–184Google Scholar
  5. Bowers KJ, Johnson SD (2005) Domestic burglary repeats and space-time clusters. Eur J Criminol 2(1):67–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1981) Environ Criminol. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  7. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (1984) Theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Stud Crime Crime Prev 8(1):7–26Google Scholar
  8. Capone DL, Nichols WW Jr (1976) Urban structure and criminal mobility. Am Behav Sci 20(2):199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centrus (2006) Desktop geocoder. Group 1 Software, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  10. Cincinnati Area Geographical Information System (CAGIS) (2006) Cincinnati neighborhood association boundary files. http://cagis.hamilton-co.org/map/cagis.htm
  11. Cincinnati Police Department (CPD) (2003) Crime statistics. http://www.cincinnatioh.gov/police/pages/-4258-/
  12. ClusterSeer 2 (2006) TerraSeer. Cyrstal Lake, ILGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44(4):588–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craglia M, Haining R, Wiles P (2000) A comparative evaluation of approaches to urban crime pattern analysis. Urban Stud 37(4):711–729Google Scholar
  15. Cromwell P, Olson JN, Avary DAW (1999) Decision strategies of residential burglars. In: Cromwell P (eds) In their own words: criminals on crime. Roxbury, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  16. Deutsch J, Hakim S, Weinblatt J (1984) Interjurisdictional criminal mobility: a theoretical perspective. Urban Stud 21(4):451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duffala DC (1976) Convenience stores, armed robbery, and physical environmental features. Am Behav Sci 20(2):227–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eck JE, Chainey S, Cameron JG, Leitner M, Wilson RE (2005) Mapping crime: understanding hot spots. U.S. Department of Justice. www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij
  19. Felson M (1994) Crime and everyday life: insight and implications for society. Pine Forge Press, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher BS, Wilkes ARP (2003) A tale of two ivory towers: a comparative analysis of victimization rates and risks between University Students in the United States and England. Br J Criminol 43(3):526–545Google Scholar
  21. Grimson RC (1989) Assessing patterns of epidemiologic events in space-time. Public Health Conference on Records and Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimson RC, Rose RD (1991) A versatile test for clustering and a proximity analysis of neurons. Methods Inf Med 30:299–303Google Scholar
  23. Groff E (2007) Simulation for theory testing and experimentation: an example using routine activity theory and street robbery. J Quant Criminol 23(2):75–103Google Scholar
  24. Groff ER, McEwen T (2007) Integrating distance into mobility triangle typologies. Soc Sci Comput Rev 25(2):210–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grubesic TH (2006) On the application of fuzzy clustering for crime hot spot detection. J Quant Criminol 22(1):77–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Pap Reg Sci Assoc 24:7–21Google Scholar
  27. Hakim S, Shachmurove Y (1996) Spatial and temporal patterns of commercial burglaries: the evidence examined. Am J Econ Sociol 55(4):443–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harries KD (1980) Crime and the environment. Charles C. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacquez GM (1996) A k nearest neighbour test for space-time interaction. Stat Med 15:1935–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jefferis E (ed) (1999) A multi-method exploration of crime hot spots: a summary of findings. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Crime Mapping Research Center, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  31. Jobes PC, Barclay E, Weinand H, Donnermeyer JF (2004) Structural analysis of social disorganisation and crime in rural communities in Australia. Aust N Z J Criminol 37(1):114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004a) The burglary as clue to the future. Eur J Criminol 1(2):237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004b) The stability of space-time clusters of burglary. Br J Criminol 44(1):55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson SD, Bowers KJ, Hirschfield A (1997) New insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of repeat victimization. Br J Criminol 37(2):224–241Google Scholar
  35. Johnson SD, Bernasco W, Bowers KJ, Elffers H, Ratcliffe J, Rengert G, Townsley M (2007) Space-time patterns of risk: a cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. J Quant Criminol 23:201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knox EG (1964) The detection of space-time interactions. Appl Stat 13(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kulldorff M, Hjalmars U (1999) The knox method and other tests for space-time interaction. Biometrics 55(2):544–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kulldorff M, Nagarwalla N (1995) Spatial disease clusters: detection and inference. Stat Med 14:799–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kulldorff M, Feuer E, Miller B, Freedman L (1997) Breast cancer clusters in the northeast United States: a geographic analysis. Am J Epidemiol 146:161–170Google Scholar
  40. Landau S, Fridman D (1993) The seasonality of violent crime: the case of robbery and homicide in Israel. J Res Crime Delinq 30(2):163–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levine N (2004) CrimeStat: a spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations, version 3.0. Ned Levine and Associates/National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Levine N (2007) CrimeStat: a spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations, version 3.0. Ned Levine and Associates/National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall RJ (1991) A review of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial patterns of disease. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A 154(3):421–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Matsueda RL, Kreager DA, Huizinga D (2006) Deterring delinquets: a rational choice model of theft and violence. Am Soc Rev 71:95–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McLafferty S, Williamson D, McGuire PG (2000) Identifying crime hot-spots using kernel smoothing. In: Goldsmith V, McGuire PG, Mollenkopf JH, Ross TA (eds) Analyzing crime patterns: frontiers of practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 77–85Google Scholar
  46. Mencken FC, Barnett C (1999) Murder, non-negligent manslaughter and spatial autocorrelation in mid-South counties. J Quant Criminol 15(4):407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Messner SF, Anselin L, Baller RD, Hawkins DF, Deane G, Tolnay SE (1999) The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: an application of exploratory spatial data analysis. J Quant Criminol 15(4):423–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller HJ (1991) Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mingers J, Brocklesby J (1997) Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega 25:489–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (2001) Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 39:517–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murray A, Estivill-Castro V (1998) Cluster discovery techniques for exploratory spatial data analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 12(5):431–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Murray AT, McGuffog I, Western JS, Mullins P (2001) Exploratory spatial data analysis techniques for examining urban crime. Br J Criminol 41(2):309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Osborne K (2006) Cops dispirited; residents might seek federal help. CityBeat. http://www.citybeat.com/2006-07-05/news.shtml
  54. Pred A (1977) The choreography of existence. Comments on Hagerstrand’s time-geography and its usefulness. Econ Geogr 53:207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pred A (1981) Social reproduction and the time-geography of everyday life. Geogr Ann Ser B Hum Geogr 63:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ratcliffe JH (2002) Aoristic signatures and the spatio-temporal analysis of high volume crime patterns. J Quant Criminol 18(1):23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ratcliffe JH (2004) The hotspot matrix: a framework for the spatio-temporal targeting of crime reduction. Police Pract Res 5:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ratcliffe JH (2005) Detecting spatial movement of intra-region crime patterns over time. J Quant Criminol 21(1):103–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ratcliffe JH (2006) A temporal constraint theory to explain opportunity-based spatial offending patterns. J Res Crime Delinq 43(3):261–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ratcliffe JH, McCullagh MJ (1999) Hotbeds of crime and the search for spatial accuracy. J Geogr Syst 1(4):385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rengert GF (1989) Space, time and crime: ethnographic insights into residential burglary. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice, USDOJ, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Roncek DW, Maier PA (1991) Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of ‘Hot Spots’. Criminology 29:725–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sagovsky A, Johnson SD (2007) When does repeat burglary victimization occur? Aust N Z J Criminol 40(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sampson RJ, Groves WB (1989) Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory. Am J Sociol 94:774–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sherman LW (1995) Hot spots of crime and criminal careers of places. In: Eck JE, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and places, crime prevention studies, vol 4. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Sherman LW, Garting PR, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27(1):27–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sideris AL (1999) Hot spots of bus stop crime: the importance of environmental attributes. J Am Plann Assoc 65(4):395–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith WR, Glave Frazee S, Davison EL (2000) Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology 38(2):489–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sutherland EH (1947) Principles of criminology, 4th edn. J.B. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  70. Taylor RB, Gottfredson SD, Brower S (1984) Block crime and fear: defensible space, local social ties and territorial functioning. J Res Crime Delinq 21(4):303–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Theophilides CN, Ahern SC, Grady S, Merlino M (2003) Identifying west nile virus risk areas: the dynamic continuous-area space-time system. Am J Epidemiol 157(9):843–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Townsley M, Homel R, Chaseling J (2003) Infectious burglaries: a test of the near repeat hypothesis. Br J Criminol 43(3):615–633Google Scholar
  73. U.S. Census Bureau (2000) Census block relationship filesGoogle Scholar
  74. van Koppen PJ, Jansen RWJ (1998) The road to the robbery: travel patterns in commercial robberies. Br J Criminol 38(2):230–246Google Scholar
  75. Velasco M, Boba R (2000) Tactical crime analysis and geographic information systems: concepts and examples. Crime Mapp News 2(2):1–4Google Scholar
  76. Warren J, Reboussin R, Hazelwood RR, Cummings A, Gibbs N, Trumbetta S (1998) Crime scene and distance correlates of serial rape. J Quant Criminol 14:35–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams GW (1984) Time space clustering of disease. In: Cornell RG (eds) Statistical methods for cancer studies. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 167–227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations