Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 179–203 | Cite as

Towards an Explanatory Taxonomy of Adolescent Delinquents: Identifying Several Social-Psychological Profiles

  • Tim Brennan
  • Markus Breitenbach
  • William Dieterich
Original Paper


Taxonomic structure is examined in two large samples of delinquent youth in a domain of socio-psychological and personality factors. This paper offers a partial empirical test of the overlapping theoretical taxonomies of Moffitt (Pshycol Rev 100:674–701, 1993), Lykken (The antisocial personalities, 1995) and Mealey (1995). The first sample consisted of juvenile offenders (n = 1,572) from three state systems. Multiple cluster analysis methods were applied (Wards method, standard K-means, bootstrapped K-means and a semi-supervised pattern recognition technique). Core or exemplar cases were identified by means of a voting procedure. Seven clusters recurrently emerged across replications. While clear analogues of Moffitt’s two main categories were found, several additional stable subtypes emerged that were clearly reminiscent of Lykken’s sociopathic, neurotic-internalizing and “normal” types. However, boundaries between types were fuzzy and unstable, and many unclassified cases existed. Internal validation was assessed by cross-method verification. External validation assessed type differentiation on several delinquent behaviors. Finally, generalizability was assessed by repeating the clustering on a large replication sample (n = 1,453) from another state. Six of the seven initial types re-emerged.


Taxonomy Patterns Cluster analysis Delinquent types Bootstrap aggregation 


  1. Aalsma MC, Lapsley D (2001) A typology of adolescent delinquency: sex differences and implications for treatment. Crim Behav Ment Health 11:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK (1984) Cluster analysis, quantitative applications in the social sciences, vol 44. Sage, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  3. Alterman AI, McDermott PA, Cacciola JS, Rutherford MJ, Boardman CR (1998) A typology of antisociality in methadone patients. J Abnorm Psychol 107(3):412–422Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. Author, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Arabie P, Hubert LJ, DeSoete G (eds) (1996) Clustering and classification. World Scientific, River Edge, NJGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergman LR (1988) You can’t classify all the people all the time. Multivariate Behav Res 23:425–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beutler LE, Malik ML (2002) Rethinking the DSM: a psychological perspective. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackburn R (1986) Patterns of personality deviation among violent offenders—replication and extension of an empirical taxonomy. Brit J Crim 26:254–269Google Scholar
  9. Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 24:123–140Google Scholar
  10. Brennan T (1987) Classification: an overview of selected methodological issues. In: Gottfredson DM, Tonry M (eds) Prediction and classification: criminal justice decision making. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 201–248Google Scholar
  11. Brennan T, Dieterich W (2003) Youth COMPAS psychometrics: reliability and validity. Northpointe Institute for Public Management, Traverse City, MIGoogle Scholar
  12. Brewer WF (1993) What are concepts? Issues of representation and ontology. In: Nakamura G, Medin D, Taraban R (eds) Categorization by humans and machines. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 495–533Google Scholar
  13. Britt CL (1994) Versatility. In: Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (eds) The generality of deviance. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 173–192Google Scholar
  14. Bronfenbrenner U (1979) The Ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  15. Bryant R (2000) Discovery and decision: exploring the metaphysics and epistemology of scientific classification. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, Madison, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Calinski T, Harabasz J (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Comm Stat 3:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa PT, Herbst J, McCrae R, Samuels J, Ozer DJ (2002) The replicability and utility of three personality types. Eur J Pers 16:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duda R, Hart P (1973) Pattern classification and scene analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Farrington DP (2003) Developmental and life course criminology: key theoretical and empirical issues. Criminology 41:221–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frick P (2004) Developmental pathways to conduct disorder: implications for serving youth who show severe aggressive and antisocial behavior. Psychol Schools 41:823–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibbons DC (1975) Offender typologies—2 decades later. Brit J Crim 15:140–156Google Scholar
  22. Gordon AD (1999) Classification. Chapman and Hall, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  24. Han J, Kamber M (2000) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Hare RD (1996) Psychopathy: a clinical construct whose time has come. Crim Justice Behav 23:25–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris P, Jones PR (1999) Differentiating delinquent youths for program planning and evaluation. Crim Justice Behav 26:403–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Narasimhan B, Chu G (2006) Pamr: Pam: prediction analysis for microarrays. R package version 1.29Google Scholar
  28. Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (1994) The generality of deviance. In: Hirschi T, Gottfredson MR (eds) The generality of deviance. Transaction Publishers, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  29. Huizinga D, Esbensen F, Weiher AW (1991) Are there multiple paths to delinquency? J Crim Law Criminol 82:83–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jefferson TW, Johnson JH (1991) Relationship of hyperactivity and sensation seeking to delinquent subtypes. Crim Justice Behav 18:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jesness CF (1988) The Jesness inventory classification system. Crim Justice Behav 15:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jessor R, Donovan JE, Costa FM (1991) Beyond adolescence: problem behavior and young adult development. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones PR, Harris PW (1999) Developing an empirically based typology of delinquent youths. J Quant Criminol 15:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lenzenweger M (2004) Consideration of the challenges, complications, and pitfalls of taxometric analysis. J Abnorm Psychol 113:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loeber R (1996) Developmental continuity, change, and pathways in male juvenile problem behaviors and delinquency. In: Hawkins JD (ed) Delinquency and crime: current theories. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  36. Loeber R, Keenan K, Zhang Q (1997) Boys’ experimentation and persistence in developmental pathways toward serious delinquency. J Child Fam Stud 6:321–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lykken D (1995) The antisocial personalities. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJGoogle Scholar
  38. McIntyre RM, Blashfield RK (1980) A nearest-centroid technique for evaluating the minimum-variance clustering procedure. Multivariate Behav Res 15(2):225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mealey L (1995) The sociobiology of sociopathy: an integrated evolutionary model. Behav Brain Sci 18:523–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meehl PE, Yonce LJ (1994) Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychol Rep 74(3):1059–1274Google Scholar
  41. Megargee E, Bohn M (1979) Classifying criminal offenders: a new system based on the MMPI. Sage Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  42. Mezzich AC, Coffman G, Mezzich JE (1991) A typology of violent delinquent adolescents. J Psychiatry Law 19:63–78Google Scholar
  43. Miller W (1958) Lower-class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. J Soc Issues 14:5–19Google Scholar
  44. Miller M, Kaloupek DG, Dillon AL, Keane TM (2004) Externalizing and internalizing subtypes of combat-related PTSD: a replication and extension using the PSY-5 scales. J Abnorm Psychol 113:636–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milligan GW (1996) Clustering validation: results and implications for applied analyses. In: Arabie P, Hubert L, DeSoete G (eds) Lustering and classification. World Scientific Press, River Edge, NJ, pp 345–379Google Scholar
  46. Milligan GW, Cooper MC (1985) An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50:159–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moffitt TE (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 100:674–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moffitt TE (2003) Life-course-persistent and adolescent-limited antisocial behavior: a 10-year research review and a research agenda. In: Lahey BB, Moffitt TE, Caspi A (eds) Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency. Guilford Press, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 49–75Google Scholar
  49. Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Rutter M, Silva PA (2001) Sex differences in antisocial behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagin DS, Land KC (1993) Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology 31:327–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nagin D, Paternoster R (2000) Population heterogeneity and state dependence: state of the evidence and directions for future research. J Quant Criminol 16:117–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newman J, MacCoon DG, Vaughn LJ, Sadeh N (2005) Validating a distinction between primary and secondary psychopathy with measures of Gray’s BIS and BAS constructs. J Abnorm Psychol 114:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Osgood DW (2005) Making sense of crime and the life-course. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 602:196–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Osgood DW, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG (1988) The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. Am Sociol Rev 53:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paternoster R, Brame R (1997) Multiple routes to delinquency? A test of developmental and general theories of crime. Criminology 35:49–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Potter CC, Jenson JM (2003) Cluster profiles of multiple problem youth: mental health problem symptoms, substance use, and delinquent conduct. Crim Justice Behav 30:230–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quay HC (1990) Patterns of delinquent behavior. In: Quay HC (ed) Handbook of juvenile delinquency. Wiley-InterscienceGoogle Scholar
  58. R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  59. Raftery A, Dean N (2004) Variable selection for model-based clustering, Technical Report 452, Department of Statistics, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  60. Raine A, Moffitt TE, Caspi A (2005) Neurocognitive impairments in boys on the life-course persistent antisocial path. J Abnorm Psychol 114:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB (eds) Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 27–48Google Scholar
  62. Sampson RJ, Laub JH (2005) A life-course view of the development of crime. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 602:12–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simourd DJ, Hoge RD, Andrews DA, Leschied AW (1994) An empirically-based typology of male young offenders. Can J Criminol 36:447–461Google Scholar
  64. Skilling TA, Quinsey VL, Craig WM (2001) Evidence of a taxon underlying serious antisocial behavior in boys. Crim Justice Behav 28:450–470Google Scholar
  65. Skinner HA (1981) Toward the integration of classification theory and methods. J Abnorm Psychol 90:68–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sorensen E, Johnson E (1996) Subtypes of incarcerated delinquents constructed via cluster analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 37:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stefurak T, Calhoun GB, Glaser BA (2004) Personality typologies of male juvenile offenders using a cluster analysis of the Millon adolescent clinical inventory introduction. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 48:96–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thagard P (1992) Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  69. VanVoorhis P (1994) Psychological classification of the adult male prison inmate. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  70. VanVoorhis P (1988) A cross classification of 5 offender typologies—issues of construct and predictive-validity. Crim Justice Behav 15:109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Walsh A (2002) Biosocial criminology. Anderson Press, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  72. Warren MQ (1971) Classification of offenders as an aid to efficient management and effective treatment. J Crim Law Criminol Police Sci 62:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wishart D (2003) Clustan graphics primer—a guide to cluster analysis, 3rd edn. Clustan Limited, Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang L, Welte JW, Wieczorek WF (2002) Underlying common factors of adolescent problem behaviors. Crim Justice Behav 29:161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou D, Bousquet O, Lal TN, Weston J, Schölkopf B (2004) Learning with local and global consistency. In: Thrun S, Saul L, Schölkopf B (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 16, MIT Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Brennan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Markus Breitenbach
    • 3
  • William Dieterich
    • 1
  1. 1.Northpointe Institute for Public Management Inc.Traverse CityUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Cognitive ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations