Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 41–58 | Cite as

Differences in the Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use Across Five Factors: Gender, Race, Age, Type of Drug, and Offense Seriousness

  • André B. Rosay
  • Stacy Skroban Najaka
  • Denise C. Herz
Original Paper


This study expands our knowledge about the validity of self-reported drug use by examining how gender, race, age, type of drug, and offense seriousness interact to affect the validity of self-reported drug use. This study also provides a conceptual framework that can be used to examine the validity of self-reported drug use. Differences in the validity of self-reported drug use are explained by examining differences in underreporting and overreporting. Differences in underreporting and overreporting are then further examined while controlling for differences in base rates of drug use. As shown, whether one controls for base rates of use may drastically affect estimates of underreporting and overreporting. By using hierarchical loglinear, logit, and logistic regression models with the Drug Use Forecasting data, we show that Black offenders provide less accurate self-reports than White offenders. Black offenders do so because they are more likely to underreport crack/cocaine use than White offenders. This difference, however, disappears once differences in base rates are controlled. A Black offender who tests positive is not more likely to underreport crack/cocaine use than a White offender who tests positive. Black offenders are also more likely to overreport both marijuana and crack/cocaine use relative to White offenders. Contrary to the first, this difference is not attributable to a difference in base rates. Methodological and substantive implications of this distinction are discussed. No differences across gender, age, or offense seriousness were found.


Drug use Self-reports Drug testing Validity Underreporting Overreporting 


  1. Andrews DA, Zinger I, Hoge RD, Bonta J, Gendreau P, Cullen FT (1990) Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology 28:369–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale RN, Van Stone WW, Engelsing TM, Zarcone VP (1981) The validity of self-reported heroin use. Int J Addict 16:1387–1398Google Scholar
  3. Falck R, Siegal HA, Forney MA, Wang J, Carlson RG (1992) The validity of injection drug users self-reported use of opiates and cocaine. J Drug Issues 22:823–832Google Scholar
  4. Fendrich M, Xu Y (1994) The validity of drug use reports from juvenile arrestees: a comparison of self-report, urinalysis and hair assay. J Drug Issues 24:99–116Google Scholar
  5. Fienberg SE (1980) The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Golub A, Johnson BD, Taylor A, Liberty, HJ (2002) The validity of arrestees’ self-reports: variations across questions and persons. Justice Q 19:477–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gray TA, Wish ED (1999) Correlates of underreporting recent drug use by female arrestees. J Drug Issues 29:91–106Google Scholar
  8. Harrell AV (1985) Validation of self-report: the research record. In: Rouse B, Kozel N, Richards L (eds) Self-report methods of estimating drug use. NIDA, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison LD (1995) The validity of self-reported data on drug use. J Drug Issues 25:91–111Google Scholar
  10. Hser Y, Maglione M, Boyle K (1999) Validity of self-report of drug use among STD patients, ER patients, and arrestees. Am J Drug Alc Abuse 25:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L (1995) Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 141:263–272Google Scholar
  12. Katz CM, Webb VJ, Gartin PR, Marshall CE (1997) The validity of self-reported marijuana and cocaine use. J Crim Jus 25:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim JYS, Fendrich M, Wislar JS (2000) The validity of juvenile arrestees’ drug use reporting: a gender comparison. J Res Crime Delinq 37:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu NT, Taylor BG, Riley KJ (2001) The validity of adult arrestee self-reports of crack cocaine use. Am J Drug Alc Abuse 27:399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Magura S, Kang SY (1995) Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: a meta-analytic review. National Development and Research Institutes, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Magura S, Goldsmith D, Casriel C, Goldstein PJ, Lipton DS (1987) The validity of methadone clients’ self reported drug use. Int J Addict 22:727–749Google Scholar
  17. McElrath K, Dunham R, Cromwell P (1995) Validity of self-reported cocaine and opiate use among arrestees in five cities. J Crim Jus 23:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McNagny SE, Parker RM (1992) High prevalence of recent cocaine use and the unreliability of patient self-report in an inner-city walk-in clinic. JAMA 267:1106–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Messina NP, Wish ED, Nemes S, Wraight B (2000) Correlates of underreporting of post-discharge cocaine use among therapeutic community clients. J Drug Issues 30:119–132Google Scholar
  20. Mieczkowski T (1990) The accuracy of self-reported drug use: an evaluation and analysis of new data. In: Weisheit R (ed) Drugs, crime and the criminal justice system. Anderson, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson DB, Kotranski L, Semaan S, Collier K, Lauby J, Feighan K, Halbert J (1998) The validity of self-reported opiate and cocaine use by out-of-treatment drug users. J Drug Issues 28:483–494Google Scholar
  22. Page WF, Davies JE, Ladner RA, Alfassa J, Tennis H (1977) Urinalysis screened vs. verbally reported drug use: the identification of discrepant groups. Int J Addic 12:439–450Google Scholar
  23. Richter L, Johnson PB (2001) Current methods of assessing substance use: a review of strengths, problems, and developments. J Drug Issues 46:34–42Google Scholar
  24. Rosenfeld R, Decker S (1993) Discrepant values, correlated measures: cross-city and longitudinal comparisons of self-reports and urine tests of cocaine use among arrestees. J Crim Jus 21:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sloan JJ, Bodapati MR, Tucker TA (2004) Respondent misreporting of drug use in self-reports: social desirability and other correlates. J Drug Issues 34:269–292Google Scholar
  26. Stephens RC, Feucht TE (1993) Reliability of self-reported drug use and urinalysis in the dug use forecasting system. Prison J 73:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wish ED, Gray T, Sushinsky J, Yacoubian GS Jr, Fitzgerald N (2000) An experiment to enhance the reporting of drug use by arrestees. J Drug Issues 30:55–76Google Scholar
  28. Wish ED, Hoffman JA, Nemes S (1997) The validity of self-reports of drug use at treatment admission and at followup: comparisons with urinalysis and hair assays. In: Harrison L, Hughes A (eds) The validity of self-reported drug use: improving the accuracy of survey estimates. NIDA, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yacoubian GS (2001) Exploring the temporal validity of self-reported marijuana use among juvenile arrestees. J Alc Drug Educ 46:34–42Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice (1996) Drug Use Forecasting: 1996 Annual Report. GPO, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • André B. Rosay
    • 1
  • Stacy Skroban Najaka
    • 2
  • Denise C. Herz
    • 3
  1. 1.Justice CenterUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA
  2. 2.Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing PolicyCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.California State UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations