Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 263–277

Self-control Depletion and the General Theory of Crime

Original Paper

Abstract

Criminological research on self-control focuses mainly on self-control failure. Such research has not, however, investigated the consequences of exercising self-control for the individual doing so. The present study investigates this issue within the framework of both criminological self-control theory and research on self-control depletion from social psychology, which depicts self-control as akin to a “muscle” that is “depletable” by prior use [Muraven and Baumeister (2000) Psycholog Bull 126:247–259]. Results are presented from a laboratory experiment in which students have the opportunity to cheat. Both “trait self-control,” as measured by the Grasmick et al. [(1993) J Res Crime Delinq 30:5–29] self-control inventory, and “self-control depletion” independently predicted cheating. The implications of these findings are explored for criminological perspectives on self-control and offender decision-making.

Keywords

Self-control Experiment Deterrence Decision-making A general theory of crime 

References

  1. Bargh JA (1994) The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer RS, Srull TS (eds) Handbook of social cognition, vol 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  2. Barkley RA (1997) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psycholog Bull 121:65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron SW (2003) Self-control, social consequences and criminal behavior: street youth and the general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 40:403–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister RF (2002) Ego depletion and self-control failure: an energy model of the self’s regulatory function. Self Identity 1:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bursik RJ Jr, Grasmick HG (1993) Neighborhoods and crime: the dimensions of effective community control. New York, MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter BL, Tiffany ST (1999) Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 94:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans DT, Cullen FT, Burton VS, Dunaway G, Bensonc ML (1997) The social consequences of self-control: testing the general theory of crime. Criminology 35:475–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. New York, NY, Macmillan Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
  9. Grasmick HG, Tittle CR, Bursik RJ Jr, Arneklev BJ (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 30:5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirschi TH, Gottfredson M (2001) Self-control theory. In: Raymond P, Ronet B (eds) Explaining criminals and crime: Essays in contemporary criminological theory. Roxbury, Los Angeles, pp 81–97Google Scholar
  11. Hirschi TH, Gottfredson M (2000) In defense of self-control. Theor Criminol 4:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirschi TH, Gottfredson M (1993) Commentary: testing the general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 30:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horney J (2005) Presidential Address to American Society of CriminologyGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanfer FH, Karoly P (1972) Self-control: a behavioristic excursion into the lion’s den. Behav Ther 3:398–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LaGrange TC, Silverman RA (1999) Low self-control and opportunity: testing the General Theory of Crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology 37:41–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Longshore D, Chang E, Hsieh SC, Messina N (2004) Self-control and social bonds: a combined control perspective on deviance. Crime Delinq 50:542–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynam DR, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Wikstrom PH, Loeber R, Novak S (2000) The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: the effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. J Abnorm Psychol 109:563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marlatt GA, Parks GA (1982) Self-management of addictive behaviors. In: Karoly P, Kanfer F (eds) Self-management and behavior change: from theory to practice. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 443–488Google Scholar
  19. Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority; an experimental view. New York, Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  20. Mischel W (1996) From good intentions to willpower. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds) The psychology of action: linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford Press, New York, pp 197–218Google Scholar
  21. Mayer JD, Gaschke YN (1988) The experience and meta-experience of mood. J Pers Soc Psychol 55:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psycholog Bull 126:247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muraven M, Collins LR, Nienhaus K (2002). Self-control and alcohol restraint: an initial application of the self-control strength model. Psychol Addict Behav 16:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muraven M, Collins RL, Shiffman S, Paty JA (2005) Daily fluctuations in self-control demands and alcohol intake. Psychol Addict Behav 19:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muraven M, Shmueli D (in press) The Self-Control Costs of Fighting the Temptation to Drink. Psychol Addict BehavGoogle Scholar
  26. Muraven M, Slessareva E (2003) Mechanisms of self-control failure: motivation and limited resources. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:894–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muraven M, Tice DM, Baumeister RF (1998) Self-control as a limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:774–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nagin DS, Pogarsky G (2003) An experimental investigation of deterrence: cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology 41:167–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orne MT (1970) Hypnosis, motivation, and the ecological validity of the psychological experiment. In: Arnold WJ, Page MM (eds) Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, pp 187–265Google Scholar
  30. Paternoster R, Brame R (1998). Structural similarity of processes generating criminal and analogous behaviors. Criminology 36:633–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero AR (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36:859–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peter T, LaGrange TC, Silverman RA (2003) Investigating the interdependence of strain and self-control. Can J Criminol Crim Just 45:431–465Google Scholar
  33. Pratt TC, Turner MG, Piquero AR (2004) Parental socialization and community context: a longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of low self-control. J Res Crime Delinq 41:219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rieger M (2004) Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing. J Exp Psychol: Hum Perc Perform 30:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush S, Earls F (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277:918–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tiffany ST (1990) A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psycholog Rev 97:147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tittle CR, Botchkovar EV (2005) Self-control, criminal motivation and deterrence: an investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology 43:307–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tittle CR, Ward DA, Grasmick HG (2004) Capacity for self-control and individuals’ interest in exercising it. J Quant Criminol 20:143–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tittle CR, Ward DA, Grasmick HG (2003) Gender, age, and crime/deviance: a challenge to self-control theory. J Res Crime Delinq 40:426–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vohs KD, Heatherton TF (2000) Self-regulatory failure: a resource-depletion approach. Psycholog Sci 11:243–254Google Scholar
  41. Wallace HW, Baumeister RF (2002) The effects of success versus failure feedback on further self-control. Self Identity 1:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyNYUSA

Personalised recommendations