Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 295–317 | Cite as

Time and Punishment: Delayed Consequences and Criminal Behavior

  • Daniel S. NaginEmail author
  • Greg Pogarsky
Article

Abstract

This article develops two distinct explanations for the failure of potential consequences to influence behavior. Discounting is the tendency to deliberatively devalue the future. In contrast, poor impulse control refers to the failure to consider the future. The implications of this distinction were investigated with data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health. The study produced several findings. First, both forms of present-orientation independently predicted a range of problem outcomes among respondents. Second, high discounting was a better predictor of deliberative or future-related problem outcomes, whereas poor impulse control was a better predictor of urge driven behaviors or conduct involving little forethought. Third, only poor impulse control but not high discounting predicted violent offending among respondents. While both forms of present-orientation were associated with property offending, high discounting was a stronger and more consistent predictor. These three findings were far more evident for males than they were for females.

Keywords

impulsivity self-control discounting add health adolescent health 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainslie, G. 1975Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse controlPsychol. Bull.82463496Google Scholar
  2. Akers, R. L. 1998Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and DevianceNortheastern University PressBostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J.,Jr. 1993Low self-control and imprudent behaviorJ. Quant. Criminol.9225247Google Scholar
  4. Babinski, L. M., Hartsough, C. S., Lambert, N. M. 1999Childhood conduct problems, hyperactivity-impulsivity, and inattention as predictors of adult criminal activityJ. Child Psychol. Psychiatry40347355Google Scholar
  5. Baron, R. A. (1971). Aggression as a function of audience presence and prior anger arousal.Google Scholar
  6. Barratt, E. S. 1959Anxiety and impulsiveness related to psychomotor efficiencyPercept. Mot. Skills.9191198Google Scholar
  7. Becker, G. S. 1968Crime and punishment: An economic approachJ. Political Econ.78526536Google Scholar
  8. Bolger, K. E., Patterson, C. J., Tompson, W. W., Kupersmidt, J. B. 1995Psychosocial adjustment among children experiencing persistent and intermittent family economic hardshipChild Dev.6611071130Google Scholar
  9. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., Jarvis, W. B. 1996Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in the need for cognitionPsychol. Bull.119197254Google Scholar
  10. Capaldi, D. M., Patterson, G. 1991Relation of parental transitions to boys’ adjustment problems: I. A linear hypothesis. II. Mothers at risk for transitions and unskilled parentingDev. Psychol27489Google Scholar
  11. Chapman, G. B. 2000Preferences for improving and declining sequences of health outcomesJ. Behav. Decis. Making13203218Google Scholar
  12. Cornish, D. B., Clarke, R. V. 1986The reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on offendingSpringer-VerlagNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, L. E., Felson, M. 1979Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approachAm. Sociol. Rev.44588608Google Scholar
  14. Costa, P. T., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., Siegler, I. C. 2000Personality at mid-life: Stability, intrinsic maturation, and response to life eventsAssessment7365378Google Scholar
  15. Cromwell, P. F., Olson, J. N., Avary, D. W. 1991Breaking and entering: An Ethonographic Analysis of Burglary. In Studies in Crime and LawSageNewbury Park, CAvol. 8.Google Scholar
  16. Depue, R. A., Collins, P. F. 1999Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversionBehav. Brain Sci.22491569Google Scholar
  17. Dolan, M., Anderson, C. J., Deakin, M. R. 2001Relationship between 5-HT function and impulsivity and aggression in male offenders with personality disordersBr. J. Psychiatry178352359Google Scholar
  18. Earls, F., Jung, K. G. 1987Temperament and home environment as causal factors in the early development of childhood psychopathologyJ. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry26491498Google Scholar
  19. Exum, M. L. 2002The application and robustness of the rational choice perspective in the study of angry and intoxicated intentions to aggressCriminology40933966Google Scholar
  20. Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, M. W. 1985Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science ApproachPlenum PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Fishburn, P. C., Rubinstein, A. 1982Time preferenceInt. Econ. Rev.23677694Google Scholar
  22. Frederick, S. (2003). (Im)patient, (Un)adventurous, (In)sensitive, and (Im)moral: Cognitive (In)ability as a predictor of time preference, risk preference, magnitude sensitivity, and cheating. Working Paper. MIT.Google Scholar
  23. Frederick, S. (1999). Discounting, time preference and identity. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  24. Giancola, P. R., Mezzich, A. C., Tarter, R. E. 1998Executive cognitive functioning, temperament, and antisocial behavior conduct-disordered adolescent femalesJ. Abnorm. Psychol.107629641Google Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, M. R., Hirschi, T. 1990A General Theory of CrimeMacmillan Publishing Co.New York, NY.Google Scholar
  26. Grasmick, H., Sims Blackwell, B., Bursik, R. 1993Changes in the sex patterning of perceived threats of sanctionsLaw Soc. Rev.,27679705Google Scholar
  27. Gustafson, R. 1994Alcohol and aggressionJ. Offender Rehabil.214180Google Scholar
  28. Hetherington, E. M., Cox, M., Cox, R. 1982Effects of divorce on parents and children.Lamb, M. E. eds. Nontraditional Families: Parenting and Child DevelopmentErlbaumHillsdale. NJ233288Google Scholar
  29. Hirschi, T. (1986). On the compatibility of rational choice and social control theories of crime, in The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, pp. 105--118.Google Scholar
  30. Hirschi, T. 1969Causes of DelinquencyUniversity of California PressBerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  31. Ito, T. A., Miller, N., Pollock, V. E. 1996Alcohol and aggression: A meta-analysis on the moderating effects of inhibitory cues, triggering events, and self-focused attentionPsychol. Bull.1206082Google Scholar
  32. Jacobs, B. A. 1999Crack to heroin? Drug markets and transitionBr. J. Criminol.39555575Google Scholar
  33. Jouriles, E. N., Barling, J., O’Leary, K. D. 1987Predicting child behavior problems in maritally violent familiesJ. Abnorm. Child Psychol.15165173Google Scholar
  34. Koopmans, T. C. 1960Stationary ordinal utility and impatienceEconometrica28287309Google Scholar
  35. Laibson, D. 1997Golden eggs and hyperbolic discountingQ. J. Econ.112443477Google Scholar
  36. Lau, M. A., Pihl, R. O., Peterson, J. B. 1995Provocation, acute intoxication, cognitive performance, and aggressionJ. Abnorm. Psychol.104150155Google Scholar
  37. Liao, T. F. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit and other generalized linear models. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, pp. 07–101. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  38. Loewenstein, G. 1996Out of control: Visceral influences on behaviorOrg. Behav. Human Decis. Processes65272293Google Scholar
  39. Loewenstein, G., Nagin, D. S., Paternoster, R. 1997The effect of sexual arousal on expectations of sexual forcefulnessJ. Res. Crime Delinquency34443473Google Scholar
  40. Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. 1991Negative time preferenceAm. Econ. Rev.81347352Google Scholar
  41. Longshore, D., Turner, S., Stein, J. A. 1996Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validityCriminology34209229Google Scholar
  42. Meier, R. F. 1995Review of ‘The Generality of Deviance’Soc. Forces73627629Google Scholar
  43. Nagin, D. S., Pogarsky, G. 2003An experimental of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivityCriminology41167191Google Scholar
  44. Nagin, D. S., Pogarsky, G. 2001Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidenceCriminology39404430Google Scholar
  45. Newman, J. P., Patterson, C. M., Kosson, D. S. 1987Response perseveration in psychopathsJ. Abnorm. Psychol.96145148Google Scholar
  46. Pate, A., Hamilton, E. E. 1992Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault ExperimentAm. Sociol. Rev.57691697Google Scholar
  47. Pogarsky, G., Lizotte, A. J., Thornberry, T. P. 2003The Delinquency of Children Born to Young Mothers: Results from the Rochester Youth Development StudyCriminology41101138Google Scholar
  48. Posner, R. A. 1973Economic Analysis of LawLittle BrownBostonGoogle Scholar
  49. Prentky, R. A., Knight, R. A. 1986Impulsivity in the lifestyle and criminal behavior of sexual offendersCrim. Justice Behav.13141164Google Scholar
  50. Rebellon, C. J., Waldman, I. 2003Deconstructing “Force and Fraud”: An empirical assessment of the generality of crimeJ. Quant. Criminol.19303331Google Scholar
  51. Samuelson, P. 1937A note on measurement of utilityRev. Econ. Stud.4155161Google Scholar
  52. Scott, K. D., Schafer, J., Greenfield, T. K. 1999The role of alcohol in physical assault perpetration and victimizationJ. Stud. Alcohol60528537Google Scholar
  53. Seguin, J. R., Boulerice, B., Harden, P., Tremblay, R. E., Pihl, R. O. 1999Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorderJ. Child Psychol. and Psychiatry4011971208Google Scholar
  54. Seguin, J. R., Pihl, R.O., Harden, P.W., Tremblay, R.E., Boulerice, B. 1995Cognitive and Neuropsychological characteristics of physically aggressive boysJ. Abnorm. Psychol.104614624Google Scholar
  55. Sherman, L. W., Berk, R. A. 1984The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assaultAm. Sociol. Rev.49261272Google Scholar
  56. Siegel, R. A. 1978Probability of punishment and suppression of behavior in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offendersJ. Abnorm. Psychol.87514522Google Scholar
  57. Taylor, S. E. 1981The interface of cognitive and social psychologyHarvey, J. eds. Cognition, Social Behavior, and the EnvironmentErlbaumHillsdale, NJ189211Google Scholar
  58. Tellegen, A. 1985Structure of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-reportTuma, A. H.Maser, J. D. eds. Anxiety and the anxiety DisordersUniversity of Minnesota PressMinneapolis, MN681706Google Scholar
  59. Tittle, C. R. 1995Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of DelinquencyWestview PressBoulderGoogle Scholar
  60. Tittle, C. R. 1980Sanctions and Social DeviancePraegerNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Wallace, J. F., Newman, J. P. 1997Neuroticism and the attentional mediation of dysregulatory PsychopathologyCogn. Ther. Res.21135156Google Scholar
  62. Ward, D. A., Stafford, M. C., Gray, L. N., Menke, B. A. 1994Deterrence, opportunity, and choiceJ. Appl. Soc. Psychol.2417771793Google Scholar
  63. Whiteside, S. P., Lynam, D. R. 2001The five factor model and Impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivityPers. Individual Differ.30669689Google Scholar
  64. Williams, K., Hawkins, R. 1986Perceptual research on general deterrence: a critical overviewLaw Soc. Rev.20545572Google Scholar
  65. Wilson, J. Q., Herrnstein, R. J. 1985Crime and Human NatureSimon and SchusterNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  66. Wright, R. T., Decker, S. H. 1997Armed Robbers in Action: Stickups and Street CultureNortheastern University PressBoston. MAGoogle Scholar
  67. Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S., Frye, D. 1997Early development of executive function: A problem-solving frameworkRev. Gen. Psychol.1198226Google Scholar
  68. Zimring, F. E., Hawkins, G. J. 1973Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime ControlUniversity of ChicagoChicagoGoogle Scholar
  69. Zimring, F. E., Hawkins, G. J. 1968Deterrence and marginal groupsJ. Res. Crime Delinquency2100114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Policy and ManagementCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity at Albany, State University of New YorkAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations