Advertisement

Gotta Name’em All: an Experimental Study on the Sound Symbolism of Pokémon Names in Brazilian Portuguese

  • Mahayana C. GodoyEmail author
  • Neemias Silva de Souza Filho
  • Juliana G. Marques de Souza
  • Hális A. N. França
  • Shigeto Kawahara
Article

Abstract

Sound-symbolic patterns which relate to the perception of size were found to motivate the behavior of English and Japanese speakers in the naming of pre- and post-evolution Pokémon. The current study builds from this finding and investigates which sound-symbolic association speakers of Brazilian Portuguese (BP) employ to name Pokémon characters. Results from 3 experiments show that vowel quality, phonological length and voiced obstruents, usually used to signal differences in size, are used to signal differences in evolution; however, the effects of voiced obstruents are not identical to what was previously observed in the behavior of Japanese speakers. We argue that although there is a universal sound symbolism associated with these sounds and the perception of largeness, its manifestation differs cross-linguistically. To the best of our knowledge, this is one the first experimental research to investigate sound symbolism and the perception of size in BP.

Keywords

Sound symbolism Brazilian Portuguese Pokémon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Matheus Mafra for his work on the first and second experiments described in this paper. We are also grateful to Ms. toto-mame for allowing us to use her pictures for the current experiments. This project is partially supported by the JSPS grant #17K13448.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aryani, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2013). Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: “Emophon”, a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Asano, M., & Yokosawa, K. (2011). Synesthetic colors are elicited by sound quality in Japanese synesthetes. Consciousness and Cognition,20(4), 1816–1823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.05.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. Retrieved from JSTOR.Google Scholar
  4. Berlin, B. (2006). The first congress of ethnozoological nomenclature. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute,12(s1), S23–S44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00271.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,113(39), 10818–10823.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605782113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & Groot, A. M. B. D. (2005). Onset entropy matters—letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing,18(3), 211–229.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3001-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. J., & Spence, C. (2013). “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition,126(2), 165–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2010). Small sounds, big deals: Phonetic symbolism effects in pricing. Journal of Consumer Research,37(2), 315–328.  https://doi.org/10.1086/651241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruz, R. C. F., & Fernandes, H. F. G. (2004). Simbolismo sonoro do PB: o estudo dos ideofones [Sound Symbolism in Brazilian Portuguese: a study of ideophones]. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem,12(2), 439–458.Google Scholar
  10. Cuskley, C. (2013). Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. Public Journal of Semiotics,5(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
  11. Daland, R., Hayes, B., White, J., Garellek, M., Davis, A., & Norrmann, I. (2011). Explaining sonority projection effects. Phonology,28(2), 197–234.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675711000145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,19(10), 603–615.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W. L., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S., & Mitterer, H. (2016). What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language,92(2), e117–e133.  https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F., & Enfield, N. J. (2013). Is “Huh?” A universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE,8(11), e78273.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078273.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language,71(1), 5–38.  https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fort, M., Martin, A., & Peperkamp, S. (2014). Consonants are more important than vowels in the bouba-kiki effect. Language and Speech, 58, 247–266.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914534951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godoy, M., Duarte, A. C. V., da Silva, F. L. F., Albano, G. F., de Souza, R. J. P., & da Silva, Y U Ade P M. (2018). Replicando o efeito Takete-Maluma em Português Brasileiro. Revista do GELNE,20(1), 87–100.  https://doi.org/10.21680/1517-7874.2018v20n1ID13331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language,56(3), 515–540.  https://doi.org/10.2307/414448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haiman, J. (Ed.). (1985). Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  20. Hamano, S. (1988). The sound symbolic system of Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  21. Hay, J., Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. (2003). Speech perception, well-formedness, and the statistics of the lexicon. In J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI: Phonetic interpretation (pp. 58–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hirata, S., Ukita, J., & Kita, S. (2011). Implicit phonetic symbolism in voicing of consonants and visual lightness using Garner’s speeded classification task. Perceptual and Motor Skills,113(3), 929–940.  https://doi.org/10.2466/15.21.28.PMS.113.6.929-940.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollard, M., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). Some physiognomic aspects of naming, or maluma and takete revisited. Perceptual and Motor Skills,19, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,369(1651), 20130298.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition,109(1), 54–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2007a). How does it hurt, kiri-kiri or siku-siku? Japanese mimetic words of pain perceived by Japanese speakers and English speakers. In M. Minami (Ed.), Applying theory and research to learning Japanese as a foreign language (pp. 2–19).Google Scholar
  27. Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2007b). What do English speakers know about gera-gera and yotayota? A cross-linguistic investigation of mimetic words for laughing and walking. Sekai no nihongo kyoiku [Japanese Language Education Around the Globe],17, 53–78.Google Scholar
  28. Kavitskaya, D. (2018). On Russian Pokémonastics. Talk at the first Conference in Pokémonastics, May 2018, Keyo University: Japan.Google Scholar
  29. Kawahara, S., & Kumagai, G. (2019). Expressing evolution in Pokémon names: Experimental explorations. Journal of Japanese Linguistics,35(1), 3–38.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-2019-2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kawahara, S., Noto, A., & Kumagai, G. (2018). Sound symbolic patterns in Pokémon names. Phonetica,75(3), 219–244.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000484938.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Kawahara, S., & Shinohara, K. (2011). Phonetic and psycholinguistic prominences in pun for- mation: Experimental evidence for positional faithfulness. In W. McClure & M. den Dikken (Eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics (Vol. 18, pp. 177–188). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
  32. Kawahara, S., Shinohara, K., & Grady, J. (2015). Iconic inferences about personality: From sounds and shapes. In M. Hiraga, W. Herlofsky, K. Shinohara, & K. Akita (Eds.), Iconicity: East meets west (pp. 57–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  33. Kawahara, S., Shinohara, K., & Uchimoto, Y. (2008). A positional effect in sound symbolism: An experimental study. In Proceedings of the Japan Cognitive Linguistics Association 8, pp. 417–427. JCLA, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  34. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar
  35. Lockwood, G., & Dingemanse, M. (2015). Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology,6, 1246.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01246.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,42(8), 1274–1281.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Madureira, S., & Camargo, Z. A. (2010) Exploring sound symbolism in the investigation of speech expressivity. In A. Botinis (Ed), ISCA, 2010, Athens. Athens, vol. 01. pp. 105–108.Google Scholar
  38. Maglio, S. J., Rabaglia, C. D., Feder, M. A., Krehm, M., & Trope, Y. (2014). Vowel sounds in words affect mental construal and shift preferences for targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,143(3), 1082–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: Sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science,9(3), 316–322.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00495.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Moos, A., Smith, R., Miller, S. R., & Simmons, D. R. (2014). Cross-modal associations in synaesthesia: Vowel colours in the ear of the beholder. I-Perception,5(2), 132–142.  https://doi.org/10.1068/i0626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Morton, E. S. (1994). Sound symbolism and its role in non-human vertebrate communication. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 348–365). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Newman, S. (1933). Further experiments on phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology,45, 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nielsen, A. K. S., & Rendall, D. (2013). Parsing the role of consonants versus vowels in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,67(2), 153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nooteboom, S. (1981). Lexical retrieval from fragments of spoken words: Beginnings vs. endings. Journal of Phonetics,9(4), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., & Namy, L. L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition,112(1), 181–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica,41(1), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000261706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ohala, J. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound Symbolism (pp. 325–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ohtake, Y., & Haryu, E. (2013). Investigation of the process underpinning vowel-size correspondence. Japanese Psychological Research,55(4), 390–399.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., & Mehler, J. (1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language,32(2), 258–278.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oushiro, L. (2018). Transcritor fonológico do português [Portuguese phonological transcription tool]. Online version (v0.5.1). https://oushiro.shinyapps.io/silac. Access on April 2019.
  51. Perfors, A. (2004). What’s in a name? The effect of sound symbolism on perception of facial attractiveness. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 26(26). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bq5v5c7.
  52. Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G. (2018). People can create iconic vocalizations to communicate various meanings to naïve listeners. Scientific Reports,8(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20961-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia—a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies,8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
  54. Saji, N., Akita, K., Imai, M., Kantartzis, K., & Kita, S. (2013). Cross-linguistically shared and language-specific sound symbolism for motion: An exploratory data mining approach. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society,35, 1253–1259.Google Scholar
  55. Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shih, S. S., Ackerman, J., Hermalin, N., Inkelas, S., & Kavitskaya, D. (2018). Pokémonikers: A study of sound symbolism and Pokémon names. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 3(1), 42-1–6.  https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shinohara, K., & Kawahara, S. (2010). A cross-linguistic study of sound symbolism: The images of size. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society,36(1), 396–410.  https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v36i1.3926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Starr, R. L., Yu, A. C. L., & Shih, S. S. (2018). Sound symbolic effects in Mandarin and Cantonese personal names and Pokémon names. Talk at the first conference in Pokémonastics, May 2018, Keyo University: Japan.Google Scholar
  59. Styles, S. J., & Gawne, L. (2017). When does Maluma/Takete fail? Two key failures and a meta-analysis suggest that phonology and phonotactics matter. I-Perception,8(4), 2041669517724807.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517724807.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Tamaoka, K., & Makioka, S. (2004). Frequency of occurrence for units of phonemes, morae, and syllables appearing in a lexical corpus of a Japanese newspaper. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36(3), 531–547.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tzeng, C. Y., Nygaard, L. C., & Namy, L. L. (2017). The specificity of sound symbolic correspondences in spoken language. Cognitive Science,41(8), 2191–2220.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Viaro, M. E., & Guimarães-Filho, Z. O. (2007). Análise quantitativa da frequência dos fonemas e estruturas silábicas portuguesas [Frequency quantitative analysis of phonemes and syllabic structures in Portuguese]. Estudos Linguísticos,36(1), 27–36.Google Scholar
  63. Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language,93(1), 10–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wiseman, M., & van Peer, W. (2003). Roman Jakobsons Konzept der Selbstreferenz aus der Perspektive der heutigen Kognitionswissenschaft [Roman Jakobson’s concept of self-reference from the perspective of present-day cognition studies]. In H. Birus, S. Donat, & B. Meyer-Sickendiek (Eds.), Roman Jakobsons Gedichtanalysen. Eine Herausforderung an die Philologien (pp. 277–306). Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
  65. Wright, S. K., Hay, J., & Bent, T. (2005). Ladies first? Phonology, frequency, and the naming conspiracy. Linguistics,43(3), 531–561.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Humanities, Languages and Arts, Federal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatalBrazil
  2. 2.The Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, Keio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations