Delayed Application of Binding Condition C During Cataphoric Pronoun Resolution
- 79 Downloads
Previous research has shown that during cataphoric pronoun resolution, the predictive search for an antecedent is restricted by a structure-sensitive constraint known as ‘Condition C’, such that an antecedent is only considered when the constraint does not apply. Evidence has mainly come from self-paced reading (SPR), a method which may not be able to pick up on short-lived effects over the timecourse of processing. This study investigates whether or not the active search mechanism is constrained by Condition C at all points in time during cataphoric processing. We carried out one eye-tracking during reading and a parallel SPR experiment, accompanied by offline coreference judgment tasks. Although offline judgments about coreference were constrained by Condition C, the eye-tracking experiment revealed temporary consideration of antecedents that should be ruled out by Condition C. The SPR experiment using exactly the same materials indicated, conversely, that only structurally appropriate antecedents were considered. Taken together, our results suggest that the application of Condition C may be delayed during naturalistic reading.
KeywordsSentence processing Cataphora Pronouns Binding German Eye-movement monitoring Self-paced reading
The authors wish to thank the following people for their help with this project: Daniela Mertzen for help with materials creation; Daniela Mertzen, Janna Drummer, Thea Villinger and Carrie Toptan for experiment preparation and data collection; Janna Drummer for fruitful discussions and useful insights.
This research was supported by an Alexander-von-Humboldt professorship awarded to Harald Clahsen (Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism) and by the German Science Foundation (DFG) through Grant No. FE 1138/1-1 awarded to Claudia Felser.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
- Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures in government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
- Clackson, K., & Clahsen, H. (2011). Online processing of cataphoric pronouns by children and adults: Evidence from eye-movements during listening. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD (Vol. 35, pp. 119–131). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
- Clifton, C. J., & Staub, A. (2011). Syntactic influences on eye movements during reading. In S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Drummond, A. (2013). Ibex Farm. http://spellout.net/ibexfarm.
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). Package “lmerTest.” R Package Version, 2.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J. W. (2010). Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 15(12), 2.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
- Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Schlenker, P. (2005). Minimize Restrictors! (Notes on Definite Descriptions, Condition C and Epithets). In E. Maier, C. Bary, & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (Vol. 9, pp. 385–416). Nijmegen: The Nijmegen Centre of Semantics (NCS).Google Scholar