Advertisement

The Influence of Presentation Format of Story on Narrative Production in Chinese Children Learning English-as-a-Second-Language: A Comparison Between Graphic Novel, Illustration Book and Text

  • Tracy K. S. Chan
  • Simpson W. L. Wong
  • Anita M.-Y. Wong
  • Vina Wing-Hei Leung
Article

Abstract

Past studies have shown that multimodal presentation of story can improve story-retelling performance in the first language. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether similar multimedia effects can be observed in second language learning and graphic novel reading. A total of 51 Chinese elementary school children, aged 7–8, who were learning English as a second language were recruited. They were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental conditions that differed in the format of story presentation: English text, English text with pictorial illustrations or graphic novel. After reading the same story, the children retold the story in English. The narratives produced were then rated by two independent raters. The results of group comparison showed that children from the three experimental groups had similar performance, indicating that multimedia presentation may not always facilitate narrative production in English as a second language. Within-subject comparison further showed that the children were relatively strong in language skills and capturing the main ideas of the story, while showing weakness in story structure awareness, elaboration, as well as local and global cohesion. Suggestions for the application of multimodal presentation of narrative texts are discussed.

Keywords

Narrative production Cognitive theory of multimedia learning Illustration book Graphic novel Chinese learners of English-as-a-second-language 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students who participated in this study. We thank Ms Nek Mak for drawing the illustration book and graphic novel used in this study.

Funding

This research was supported by the General Research Fund from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (GRF845213).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, D., & Edmundson, A. (1987). Language-impaired 4-year olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bliss, L. S., McCabe, A., & Miranda, A. E. (1998). Narrative assessment profile: Discourse analysis for school-age children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31(4), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosma, K., Rule, A. C., & Krueger, K. S. (2013). Social studies content reading about the American Revolution enhanced with graphic novels. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8(1), 59–76.Google Scholar
  5. Brante, E. W., Olander, M. H., & Nyström, M. (2013). Exploring the impact of contrasting cases in text and picture processing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 32(2), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brenna, B. (2013). How graphic novels support reading comprehension strategy development in children. Literacy, 47(2), 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, H. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, A. Y. W. (2004). Syntactic transfer: Evidence from the interlanguage of Hong Kong Chinese ESL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 88(1), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung, H., Chung, K. H., Wong, S. W. L., McBride-Chang, C., Penney, T. B., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2010). Speech perception, metalinguistic awareness, reading, and vocabulary in Chinese-English bilingual children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ching, H. S., & Fook, F. S. (2013). Effects of multimedia-based graphic novel presentation on critical thinking among students of different learning approaches. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 56–66.Google Scholar
  12. Christensen, L. (2006). Graphic global conflict: Graphic novels in the high school social studies classroom. Social Studies, 97(6), 227–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, J. S. (2013). “Your Credibility Could Be Shot”: Preservice Teachers’ Thinking about Nonfiction Graphic Novels, Curriculum Decision Making, and Professional Acceptance. Social Studies, 104(1), 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, J. S. (2014). Teaching historical agency: Explicitly connecting past and present with graphic novels. Social Studies Research & Practice, 9(3), 66–80.Google Scholar
  16. Crawford, P. (2004). A novel approach: Using graphic novels to attract reluctant readers. Library Media Connection, 22(5), 26–28.Google Scholar
  17. Cruz de Quirós, A. M., Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., & Irby, B. J. (2012). The effect of a structured story reading intervention, story retelling and higher order thinking for English language and literacy acquisition. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(1), 87–113.Google Scholar
  18. Curriculum Development Council. (2004). English language education key learning area English language curriculum guide (Primary 1–6). Hong Kong: HKSARG.Google Scholar
  19. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test-4th edition (PPVT-4). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar
  20. Dutke, S., & Rinck, M. (2006). Multimedia Learning: Working memory and the learning of word and picture diagrams. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards, B. (2009). Motivating middle school learners: The graphic novel link. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 25(8), 56–58.Google Scholar
  22. Ehlers-Zavala, F., & Bakken, J. P. (1997). The role of picture books. TESOL Journal, 7(1), 46–47.Google Scholar
  23. Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elley, W. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effect of book-based programs. Language Learning, 41(3), 375–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elley, W., & Mangubhai, F. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ercan, O. (2014). The effects of multimedia learning material on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards science courses. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 608–621.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, J. (2013). From comics, graphic novels and picture books to fusion texts: A new kid on the block! Education 3–13, 41(2), 233–248.Google Scholar
  28. Fitzgerald, J. (1984). The relationship between reading ability and expectations for story structure. Discourse Processes, 7, 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fitzgerald, J., & Teasley, A. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children’s writing. Journal of Education Psychology, 78, 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foster, K. (2004). Graphic novels in libraries: An expert’s opinion. Library Media Connection, 22(5), 30.Google Scholar
  31. Foulsham, T., Wybrow, D., & Cohn, N. (2016). Reading without words: Eye movements in the comprehension of comic strips. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 566–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freytag, G. (1863). Die technik des dramas. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
  33. Gambrell, L. B., & Chasen, S. P. (1991). Explicit story structure instruction and the narrative writing of fourth-and fifth-grade below-average readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 31(1), 54–62.Google Scholar
  34. Gillam, R., McFadden, T., & van Kleeck, A. (1995). Improving narrative abilities: Whole language and language and language skills approaches. In M. Fey, J. Windsor, & S. F. Warren (Eds.), Language intervention: Preschool through the elementary years (Vol. 5, pp. 145–183). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  35. Gordon, C. J., & Braun, C. (1983). Using story schema as an aid to reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 37(2), 116–121.Google Scholar
  36. Griffin, P., Woods, K., Storey, P., Wong, E. K. P., & Fung, W. Y. W. (2007). Evaluation of the native-speaking English teacher scheme for primary schools in Hong Kong. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  37. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  38. Henry, R., & Simpson, C. (2001). A match made in heaven. Teacher Librarian, 28(3), 23.Google Scholar
  39. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoffman, L., Templin, J., & Rice, M. L. (2012). Linking outcomes from Peabody Picture Vocabulary test forms using item response models. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 55(3), 754–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hughes, D. L., McGillivray, L., & Schmidek, M. (1997). Guide to narrative language: Procedures for assessment. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Jared, D., Pei, Y. P., & Paivio, A. (2013). L1 and L2 picture naming in Mandarin-English bilinguals: A test of bilingual dual coding theory. Bilingualism, 16(2), 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jennings, K. A., Rule, A. C., & Zanden, S. V. (2014). Fifth graders’ enjoyment, interest, and comprehension of graphic novels compared to heavily-illustrated and traditional novels. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, R., Gray, C., & Gordon, T. (2009). Primary Longman elect. Hong Kong: Longman Hong Kong Education.Google Scholar
  45. Kapalková, S., Polišenská, K., Marková, L., & Fenton, J. (2016). Narrative abilities in early successive bilingual Slovak-English children: A cross-language comparison. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lavin, M. R. (1998). Comic books and graphic novels for libraries: What to buy. Serials Review, 24(2), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu, G. (2006). Exploring the influence o f western picture books on Chinese elementary students ’ vocabulary gains, story-retelling abilities, and attitudes toward English language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennysylvania, USA: Indiana University of Pennysylvania.Google Scholar
  48. Luckner, J. L., & Handley, C. M. (2008). A summary of the reading comprehension research undertaken with students who are deaf and hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(1), 6–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lyga, A. A. (2006). Graphic Novels for (Really) Young Readers: Owly, Buzzboy, Pinky and Stinky. Who Are These Guys? And Why Aren’t They Ever on The Shelf? School Library Journal, 52(3), 56–61.Google Scholar
  50. Martin, A. (2009). Graphic novels in the classroom. Library Media Connection, 28(2), 30–31.Google Scholar
  51. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages: The case of multimedia explanations. Document Design, 1, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCabe, A. (1995). Evaluating narrative discourse skills. In K. Cole, P. Dale, & D. Thal (Eds.), Assessment of communication and language (pp. 121–141). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  55. McFadden, T., & Gillam, R. (1996). An examination of the quality of narratives produced by children with language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Omori, T., Ishii, T., & Kurata, K. (2004). Eye catchers in comics: Controlling eye movements in reading pictorial and textual media. Paper presented at the 28th International Congress of Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.cirm.keio.ac.jp/media/contents/2004ohmori.pdf.
  58. Orrantia, J. O., Múñez, D., & Tarín, J. (2014). Connecting goals and actions during reading: The role of illustrations. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Paivio, A., Clark, J. M., & Lambert, W. E. (1988). Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pantaleo, S. (2012). Middle-school students reading and creating multimodal texts: A case study. Education 3–13, 40(3), 295–314.Google Scholar
  62. Paul, R., & Norbury, C. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating (4th ed.). Missouri: Mosby.Google Scholar
  63. Petersen, D. B., Thompsen, B., Guiberson, M. M., & Spencer, T. D. (2015). Cross-linguistic interactions from second language to first language as the result of individualized narrative language intervention with children with and without language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(3), 703–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Ifenthaler, D. (2011). Reading guided by automated graphical representations: How model-based text visualizations facilitate learning in reading comprehension tasks. Instructional Science, 39(6), 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roch, M., Florit, E., & Levorato, C. (2016). Narrative competence of Italian-English bilingual children between 5 and 7 years. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Romero-Jódar, A. (2013). Comic books and graphic novels in their generic context. Towards a Definition and Classification of Narrative Iconical Texts, Atlantis, 35(1), 117–135.Google Scholar
  67. Ronen, I. (1997). The compositional pattern of Boris Godunov and Freytag’s Pyramid. Elementa: Journal of Slavic Studies & Comparative Cultural Semiotics, 3(3), 195.Google Scholar
  68. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schüler, A., Arndt, J., & Scheiter, K. (2015). Processing multimedia material: Does integration of text and pictures result in a single or two interconnected mental representations? Learning and Instruction, 35, 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schwarz, G. (2006). Expanding literacies through graphic novels. English Journal, 95, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Squires, K. E., Lugo-Neris, M. J., Peña, E. D., Bedore, L. M., Bohman, T. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2014). Story retelling by bilingual children with language impairments and typically developing controls. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(1), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stein, N. S., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. II, pp. 53–120). New York, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  73. Suen, M. T. M., Li, W. O., & Wong, S. W. L. (2018). A review of the cognitive and emotive mechanisms underpinning the facilitatory effects of comic features on reading comprehension. EC Psychology and Psychiatry, 7(3), 106–111.Google Scholar
  74. Tabachnick, S. (2009). Teaching the graphic novel. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
  75. To, C. K. S., Stokes, S. F., Cheung, H. T., & T’sou, B. (2010). Narrative assessment for Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(3), 648–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ukrainetz, T. A., & Gillam, R. B. (2009). The expressive elaboration of imaginative narratives by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(4), 883–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Verhallen, M. J., & Bus, A. G. (2011). Young second language learners’ visual attention to illustrations in storybooks. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(4), 480–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Whaley, J. F. (1981). Readers’ expectations for story structure. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 90–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wong, S. W. L. (2014). When a teacher met a cartoonist: A guide to creating educational graphic novels. Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  80. Wong, S. W. L., Miao, H., Cheng, R. W.-Y., & Yip, M. C. W. (2017). Graphic novel comprehension among learners with differential cognitive styles and reading abilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 33(5), 412–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zaretsky, E. (2014). The role of L1 and L2 reading on L1 preservation and positive cross-linguistic transfer among sequential bilinguals. Written Language and Literacy, 17(1), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of Education StudiesHong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong
  3. 3.The University of Hong KongPok Fu LamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations