Use of Prosocial Word Enhances the Processing of Language: Frequency Domain Analysis of Human EEG
- 297 Downloads
Use of prosocial language enhances human cooperation and harmony. Previous research has shown that talking about helping, sharing and giving to others creates positive impression on others, by which individuals and governments gain public approval. So far, the value judgement of approval and disapproval in terms of prosocial or antisocial has not been investigated in the domain of neuroscience of language. Here, the influence of prosocial words towards neural adaptability for greater acceptance is examined using behavioural response mapping with electroencephalography activities of human brain. The prosocial and antisocial words employing correct and incorrect set of sentences in English are presented to participants for performing grammatical judgement task. Our results show that processing of antisocial word requires larger neurocognitive resources as compared to prosocial one, which is corroborated with our behavioural response time suggesting higher response time for antisocial than prosocial words.
KeywordsProsocial words Antisocial words Human cooperation Language processing Response time Response accuracy EEG ERP
Funding was provided by Seed Grant, NIT Raipur (Grant No. NITRR/SeedGrant/2016-17/009), Department of Science and Technology, Government of West Bengal (IN) (Grant No. SERB/ECR/00015).
- Aftanas, L., Varlamov, A., Pavlov, S., Makhnev, V., & Reva, N. (2001). Event-related synchronization and desynchronization during affective processing: emergence of valence-related time-dependent hemispheric asymmetries in theta and upper alpha band. International Journal of Neuroscience, 110(3–4), 197–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1972). How to make a language user. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 309–351). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Demb, J. B., Desmond, J. E., Wagner, A. D., Vaidya, C. J., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1995). Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: A functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. Journal of Neuroscience, 15(9), 5870–5878.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krahé, B. (2013). The social psychology of aggression. Milton Park: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Palazova, M., Mantwill, K., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2009). Effects of emotion in words are localized in post-lexical processing stages. In Psychophysiology (Vol. 46, pp. S160–S160). Commerce place, 350 main st., Malden 02148, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
- Spinrad, T. L., Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Fabes, R. A., Valiente, C., Shepard, S. A., et al. (2006). Relation of emotion-related regulation to children's social competence: A longitudinal study. Emotion, 6(3), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3518.104.22.1688.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, P. B., Poljacik, G., Decety, J., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2017). Loving-kindness language exposure leads to changes in sensitivity to imagined pain. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 1–5.Google Scholar