Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 913–930 | Cite as

Non-Selective Lexical Access in Late Arabic–English Bilinguals: Evidence from Gating

  • Sami Boudelaa
Article
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Previous research suggests that late bilinguals who speak typologically distant languages are the least likely to show evidence of non-selective lexical access processes. This study puts this claim to test by using the gating task to determine whether words beginning with speech sounds that are phonetically similar in Arabic and English (e.g., [b,d,m,n]) give rise to selective or non-selective lexical access processes in late Arabic–English bilinguals. The results show that an acoustic-phonetic input (e.g., [bæ]) that is consistent with words in Arabic (e.g., [bædrun] “moon”) and English (e.g., [bæd] “bad”) activates lexical representations in both languages of the bilingual. This non-selective activation holds equally well for mixed lists with words from both Arabic and English and blocked lists consisting only of Arabic or English words. These results suggest that non-selective lexical access processes are the default mechanism even in late bilinguals of typologically distant languages.

Keywords

Arabic–English bilingualism Cross-language acoustic-phonetic similarities Gating 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the following UAEU-FHSS Grant G00001813 and G00002367. The author would like thank an anonymous reviewer for their helpful suggestions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

This study is approved by the United Arab Emirates University Research Ethics Committee: ERH_2016_5442.

References

  1. Albert, M. L., & Obler, L. K. (1978). The bilingual brain: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic aspects of bilingualism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2005). Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Lang Speech, 48, 1–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Best, C. (1995). A direct realistic view of cross-language speech perception. In Winifred Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Aralex: A lexical database for modern standard Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 481–487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caramazza, A., & Brones, I. (1980). Semantic classification by bilinguals. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 34, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chumbley, J. I., & Balota, D. A. (1984). A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 12, 590–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, A., La Heij, W., & Navarrete, E. (2006). The dynamics of bilingual lexical access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotton, S., & Grosjean, F. (1984). The gating paradigm: A comparison of successive and individual presentation formats. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 41–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Craig, C., Kim, B., Rhyner, P., & Chirillo, T. (1993). Effects of word predictability, child development and aging on time-gated speech recognition performance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 832–841.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. De Groot, A. M., & Nas, G. L. (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and non-cognates in compound bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 90–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Sousa, L. B., & Gabriel, R. (2015). Does the mental lexicon exist? Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 23, 335–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.Google Scholar
  16. Dijkstra, T., Van Heuven, W. J., & Grainger, J. (1998). Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 177–196.Google Scholar
  17. Durgunoǧlu, A. Y., & Roediger, H. L. (1987). Test differences in accessing bilingual memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duyck, W., Depestel, I., Fias, W., & Reynvoet, B. (2008). Cross-lingual numerical distance priming with second-language number words in native-to third-language number word translation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1281–1290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Embarki, M. (2013). Phonetics. In J. Owens (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics (pp. 23–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In Winifred Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Frauenfelder, U. H., & Tyler, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction. Cognition, 25, 1–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: A distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghazeli, S. (1977). Back consonants and backing coarticulation in Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  25. Guion, S. G. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica, 60, 98–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gollan, T. H., Sandoval, T., & Salmon, D. P. (2011). Cross-language intrusion errors in aging bilinguals reveal the link between executive control and language selection. Psychological Science, 22, 1155–1164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grainger, J., & Beauvillain, C. (1987). Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 28, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grosjean, F. (1988). Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 233–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2012). The psycholinguistics of bilingualism. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Grosjean, F., & Soares, C. (1986). Processing mixed language: Some preliminary findings. In J. Vaid (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives (pp. 145–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Heredia, R. R., & Altarriba, J. (Eds.). (2013). Foundations of bilingual memory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2007). Bilingual language processing and interference in bilinguals: Evidence from eye tracking and picture naming. Language Learning, 57, 119–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kintsch, W. (1970). Recognition memory in bilingual subjects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolers, P. A. (1966). Interlingual facilitation of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kroll, J. F., & De Groot, A. M. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuhl, P., & Rivera-Gaxiola, M. (2008). Neural substrates of language acquisition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 511–534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ladefoged, P. (1962). Elements of acoustic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lahiri, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 254–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Léwy, N. (2015). Computational psycholinguistics and spoken word recognition in the bilingual and the monolingual. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  46. Léwy, N., & Grosjean, F. (2008). The Léwy and Grosjean BIMOLA model. In F. Grosjean (Ed.), Studying bilinguals (pp. 201–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Macnamara, J. (1967). The bilingual’s linguistic performance: A psychological overview. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall, N., Duke, L., & Walley, A. (1996). The effects of age and Alzheimer’s disease on recognition of gated spoken words. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 724–733.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653–675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin, C. D., Costa, A., Dering, B., Hoshino, N., Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2011). Effects of speed of word processing on semantic access. Brain and Language, 120, 61–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Morales, L., Paolieri, D., Dussias, P. E., Kroff, J. R. V., Gerfen, C., & Bajo, M. T. (2016). The gender congruency effect during bilingual spoken-word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paradis, M. (1977). Bilingualism and aphasia. Studies in Neurolinguistics, 3, 65–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Roberts, P. M., Garcia, L. J., Desrochers, A., & Hernandez, D. (2002). English performance of proficient bilingual adults on the Boston Naming Test. Aphasiology, 16, 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., & Cortese, C. (1984). Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L., et al. (1990). More words but still no lexicon: Reply to Besner. Psychological Review, 97, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmidt, A. M., & Flege, J. E. (1995). Effects of speaking rate changes on native and non-native production. Phonetica, 52, 41–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Simmonds, A. J., Wise, R. J., & Leech, R. (2011). Two tongues, one brain: Imaging bilingual speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 166, 1–13.Google Scholar
  62. Soares, C., & Grosjean, F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 12, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. ten Thije, J. D., & Zeevaert, L. (2007). Receptive multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tyler, L., & Wessels, J. (1985). Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 217–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Hell, J. G., & De Groot, A. M. (1998). Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 780–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Warren, P., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 41, 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weinreich, U. (1957). On the description of phonic interference. Word, 13, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2005). Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 233–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl AinUAE
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations