Wh-Questions, Universal Statements and Free Choice Inferences in Child Mandarin

Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated 5-year-old Mandarin-speaking children’s comprehension of wh-questions, universal statements and free choice inferences. Previous research has found that Mandarin-speaking children assign a universal interpretation to sentences with a wh-word (e.g., shei ‘who’) followed by the adverbial quantifier dou ‘all’ (Zhou in Appl Psycholinguist 36:411–435, 2013). Children also compute free choice inferences in sentences that contain a modal verb in addition to a wh-word and dou (Zhou, in: Nakayama, Su, Huang (eds.) Studies in Chinese and Japanese language acquisition: in honour of Stephen Crain. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 223–235, 2017). The present study used a Question-Statement Task to assess children’s interpretation of sentences containing shei + dou, both with and without the modal verb beiyunxu ‘was allowed to’, as well as the contrast between sentences with shei + dou, which are statements for adults, versus ones with dou + shei, which are wh-questions for adults. The 5-year-old Mandarin-speaking child participants exhibited adult-like linguistic knowledge of the semantics and pragmatics of wh-words, the adverbial quantifier dou, and the deontic modal verb beiyunxu.

Keywords

Wh-questions Free choice inferences Adverbial quantifier dou Child Mandarin Language acquisition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorder (CE110001021). In addition, the research was supported by an International Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship to Haiquan Huang (No. 2014016). Peng Zhou and Stephen Crain are members of the the ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorder, Macquarie University. For helpful feedback and discussion, we thank Jim Huang, Gennaro Chierchia, Lyn Tieu, Yimei Xiang and Cory Bill. Finally, we express our sincere thanks to Juan Cai for her assistance in conducting the experiments at the kindergarten affiliated with the Hubei University of Technology.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study has also received the Ethics Approval from Faculty of Human Science-Human Research Ethics Sub-Committee, Macquarie University, Australia and the ethics reference number is 5201500028.

References

  1. Cheng, L. L.-S. (1991). On the typology of wh-questions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Cheng, L. L.-S. (1994). Wh-words as polarity items. Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 2, 615–640.Google Scholar
  3. Cheng, L. L.-S. (1995). On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 4, 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chierchia, G. (2010). Meanings as inferences: The polarity system. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Chierchia, G. (2006). Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 535–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (1966). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton & Co., Printers.Google Scholar
  8. Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D., & Woodams, E. (1996). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5, 83–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (Palgrave studies in pragmatics, language and cognition) (pp. 71–120). Houndmills, Basingstoke & Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haspelmatch, M. (1997). Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  13. Karttunen, L. (1977). Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, T. H.-T. (1986). Studies on quantification in Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  16. Li, A. Y.-H. (1992). Indefinite wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, J. (1995). Dou and wh-questions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 4, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liao, C.-H. (2010). Alternative and exhaustification: Non-interrogative uses of Chinese wh-words. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  19. Lin, J.-W. (1996). Polarity licensing and wh-phrases in Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, J.-W. (1998). On existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 7, 219–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pan, H.-H. (2006). Focus, tripartite structure, and the semantic interpretation of Mandarin dou. Research and Exploration on Grammar, 13, 163–184. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Wexler, K., & Culicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, L., Li, B.-L., & Pan, H.-H. (2012). The semantic requirements of dou: A study of its rightward association. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 32, 63–71. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  24. Zhou, P. (2013). Children’s knowledge of wh-quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhou, P. (2017). Free choice and wh-indefinites in child Mandarin. In M. Nakayama, Y.-C. Su, & A.-J. Huang (Eds.), Studies in Chinese and Japanese language acquisition: In honour of Stephen Crain (pp. 223–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou, P., & Crain, Stephen. (2011). Children’s knowledge of the quantifier dou in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40, 155–176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders and Department of Cognitive ScienceMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Child Cognition LabTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders and Department of LinguisticsMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations