Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 1321–1341 | Cite as

How Possessive Relations are Mapped onto Child Language: A View from Mandarin Chinese

  • Jiawei Shi
  • Peng Zhou
Article
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

The present studies sought to investigate the mapping relations between language and cognition by focusing on how Mandarin-speaking children acquire the mapping between their conceptual knowledge of possession and their linguistic expressions of possession. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 used a comprehension task to explore whether young children are able to map their knowledge of possessive constructions onto their interpretation of possessive relations. Experiment 2 employed a production task to examine whether they are able to map their knowledge of possessive relations onto their linguistic expressions of possession. The findings were that 4-year-olds exhibited correct comprehension and production of possessive DE constructions, indicating that by age 4, Mandarin-speaking children have already established the mapping between their conceptual knowledge of possession and their linguistic expressions of possession. By contrast, 3-year-olds exhibited response patterns that suggest a developmental stage where they use noun–noun compounds to represent possessive relations before they map possessive relations onto possessive constructions.

Keywords

Possessive relations Possessive constructions Mapping Child language Mandarin Chinese 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (2016THZWLJ14) to the corresponding author Peng Zhou. The authors are grateful to Stephen Crain and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the paper. The authors would also like to thank the children and the teachers at Beijing Taolifangyuan Kindergarten, for their assistance and support in running the experiments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2013). Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 1–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armon-Lotem, S., & Crain, S. (1998). Interface conditions on child language: A cross-linguistic look at genitives. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 13–23.Google Scholar
  3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castillo, J. C. (2001). Thematic relations between nouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  5. Chappell, H. (1996). Inalienability and the personal domain in Mandarin Chinese discourse. In H. Chappell & W. McGregor (Eds.), The grammar of inalienability. A typological perspective on body part terms and the part–whole relation (pp. 465–527). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chappell, H., & Thompson, S. A. (1992). The semantics and pragmatics of associative de in Mandarin discourse. Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale, 21, 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dabrowska, E. (2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: The Polish genitive. Journal of Child Language, 28, 545–574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kliffer, M. D. (1996). Commonalities of French and Mandarin inalienable possession. Language Sciences, 18, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kong, L., Zhou, G., & Li, X. (1990). Investigation on the use of DE by 1 to 5 years old children. Psychological Science, 6, 14–20.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, T. H.-T. (1996). Theoretical issues in language development and Chinese child language. In J. C.-T. Huang & A. Y.-H. Li (Eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics (pp. 293–356). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Li, Y. (2004). The development of child language. Wuhan: Huazhong Normal University Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. Lin, C. C. (2007). Processing (in)alienable possessions at the syntax–semantics interface. In Paper presented at the conference on linguistic interfaces. Northern Ireland: University of Ulster.Google Scholar
  15. Lin, Y. A. (2010). The de-marked modification structure in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of the 22nd North American conference on Chinese linguistics.Google Scholar
  16. Liu, Z. (2015). The development of noun-modifying constructions in child Mandarin. Ph.D. dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
  17. Luo, Y. (2013). Possessive constructions in Mandarin Chinese. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 186–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lyu, S. (1979). On the analysis of Chinese Grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Lyu, S. (2009). Eight hundred words in Modern Chinese. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Marinis, T. (2002). Acquiring the possessive construction in modem Greek. In I. Lasser (Ed.), The process of language acquisition (pp. 57–80). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  21. Packard, J. L. (1988). The first language acquisition of prenominal modification with de in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 16, 31–53.Google Scholar
  22. Parikka, A. (2001). Expressing possession: Similarities in the use of genitive in early child English and Finish. Psychology of Language and Communication, 5, 25–32.Google Scholar
  23. R Development Core Team (2013). The R project for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org.
  24. Si, F. (2014). Two types of possessive structures in Chinese. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 2, 43–51. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  25. Zhang, N. (1999). Chinese DE and the DE-construction. Syntaxis, 2, 27–49.Google Scholar
  26. Zhu, D. (1961). On DE. Studies of the Chinese Language, 12, 67–103 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  27. Zhu, D. (1966). About the paper “On ‘de”’. Studies of the Chinese Language, 1, 37–46 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Child Cognition LabTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations