Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing
- 249 Downloads
Previous studies on Korean relative clauses (RC) show that, with respect to processing, object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) are more difficult to process at the head noun than subject-extracted relative clauses within temporarily ambiguous contexts. ORCs, however, are predicted by experience-based processing models to incur a greater processing cost during early processing stages at the RC verb, since it is a likely locus of disambiguation for RCs in Korean, and because ORCs are a less frequent structure. Consequently, the current study investigates whether processing difficulty for ORCs manifests itself at the RC verb using eye-tracking methods, a simple sentence structure and a sentential-decision task. The results revealed significantly increased go-past reading times for ORCs at the RC verb. We believe this is a result of a less frequent structure being more difficult to parse during disambiguation. Accordingly, experience-based models of processing can accurately predict difficulty for ORCs in Korean.
KeywordsKorean Relative clauses Eye-tracking Experience Ambiguity
We would also like to thank the participants at the AMLaP 2015 ‘Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing’ for their insightful comments. Additionally, we would like extend our gratitude to our reviewer for their helpful comments on this paper. Lastly, we would like to express our appreciation to Professor Sugiura of the Graduate School of International Development at Nagoya University for allowing us to use his eyetracker. This study was funded in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant Number 16K13242 (principal researcher: Katsuo Tamaoka), and the Grand-In-Aid for JSPS doctoral course fellows granted to Michael P. Mansbridge (15J03336).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Human and Animal Rights Statement
All personal information collected from participants was stored in a secured location, and participants were given pseudonyms for data analysis purposes. Participants were not subject to harm and could only experience mild discomfort from prolong seating or eye discomfort from prolong reading.
In the current study, all participants gave informed consent and received monetary compensation.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (version 1.1-7) [R Cran package]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
- Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Vergara, M., de la Cruz-Pavía, I., & Laka, I. (2010). Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque. Cognition, 115(1), 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.012.
- Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax Cambridge. Multilingual Matters: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
- Dryer, M. (2013). Order of relative clause and noun. In M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
- Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium (pp. 95–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Johnson, M., & Lee, Y. (2006). Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(6), 1304. doi: 10.1037/0278-73220.127.116.114.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hale, J. (2001, June). A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies (pp. 159–166). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
- Kang, B., & Kim, H. (2004). Sejong Korean Corpora in the making. In M. Lino, M. Xavier, F. Ferreira, R. Costa, R. Silva, C. Pereira, F. Carvalho, M. Lopes, M. Catarino, & S. Barros (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 1747–1750). Paris, France: European Language Resources AssociationGoogle Scholar
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) (version 2.0-6) [R Cran package]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest. R package version 2.0-6.
- Kwon, N. (2008). Processing of syntactic and anaphoric gap-filler dependencies in Korean: Evidence from self-paced reading time, ERP and eye-tracking experiments. Dissertation, San Diego: University of California.Google Scholar
- Kwon, N., Polinsky, M., & Kluender, R. (2006). Subject preference in Korean. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 1–14). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
- Lin, C. J. C., & Bever, T. G. (2006). Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 254–260). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
- Miyamoto, E., & Nakamura, M. (2003). Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in japanese. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd west coast conference on formal linguistics (p. 342355). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
- Nakayama, M., Lee, S. H., & Lewis, R. (2005). Difficulty of processing Japanese and Korean center-embedding constructions. Studies in Language Sciences, 4, 99–118.Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.1.2). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/