Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 433–456 | Cite as

Measuring Metasyntactic Abilities: On a Classification of Metasyntactic Tasks

  • Daphnée Simard
  • Marie Labelle
  • Annie Bergeron
Article

Abstract

Researchers working on metasyntactic abilities (i.e., the metalinguistic ability associated with syntax) face the problem of defining and measuring them. Metasyntactic abilities is a multifaceted concept, which encompasses various types of behaviours, from being able to intentionally manipulate syntactic structures to being able to state syntactic rules, and the way in which it is defined and measured varies greatly from one study to another. The present paper proposes a theoretically informed classification of syntax related tasks. The first part presents previous research defining and distinguishing various types of syntactic and metasyntactic abilities and their interrelations. In the second part, commonly used tasks are described and analyzed in terms of the framework presented, with the aim of better pinpointing the type of ability measured by each task. Ultimately, with this analysis of commonly used tasks, we hope to offer criteria for discriminating between the various measures of metasyntactic abilities.

Keywords

Psycholinguistics Metalinguistic ability Second language acquisition First language acquisition 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armand, F. (2000). Le rôle des capacités métalinguistiques et de la compétence langagière orale dans l’apprentissage de la lecture en français langue première et seconde. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 56, 469–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batterink, L., & Neville, H. J. (2013). The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 8528–8533.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E. (2001a). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, & cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialystok, E. (2001b). Metalinguistic aspects of bilingual processing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bialystok, E. (1993). Metalinguistic awareness: The development of children’s representations of language. In C. Pratt & A. F. Garton (Eds.), Systems of representation in children. Development and use (pp. 211–233). New-York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bialystok, E. (1991). Metalinguistic dimensions of bilingual language proficiency. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 113–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bialystok, E. (1990). The dangers of dichotomy: A reply to Hulstijn. Applied Linguistics, 11, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24, 560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bialystok, E. (1986). Factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Child Development, 57, 498–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bialystok, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blackmore, A. M., & Pratt, C. (1997). Grammatical awareness and reading in grade 1 children. Merrill-Palmer, 43, 567–590.Google Scholar
  15. Blackmore, A. M., Pratt, C., & Dewsbury, A. (1995). The use of props in a syntactic awareness task. Journal of Child Language, 22, 405–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bowey, J. A. (2005). Grammatical sensitivity: Its origins and potential contribution to early word reading skill. Journal Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 318–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bowey, J. A. (1994). Grammatical awareness and learning to read: A critique. In E. M. H. Assink (Ed.), Literacy acquisition and social context (pp. 122–149). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  19. Bowey, J. A. (1986a). Syntactic awareness and verbal performance from preschool to fifth grade. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bowey, J. A. (1986b). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bowey, J. A., & Patel, R. K. (1988). Metalingustic ability and early reading achievement. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 679–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalingusitic judgements: A review of theory, methods and results. Language Learning, 33, 343–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chiappe, P., & Siegel, L. S. (1999). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition in English- and Punjabi-speaking Canadian children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clark, A., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1993). The cognizer’s innards: A psychological and philosophical perspective on the development of thought. Mind and Language, 8, 487–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Correa, J. (2005). A avaliação da consciência sintática na criança: uma análise metodológica. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 20, 60–75.Google Scholar
  28. Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspective (pp. 94–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Culioli, A. (1990). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Tome 1. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
  30. Culioli, A. (1968a). La formalisation en linguistique. Cahier pour l’analyse, 9, 106–117.Google Scholar
  31. Culioli, A. (1968b). À propos du genre en anglais contemporain. Les langues modernes, 6, 38–46.Google Scholar
  32. Da Fontoura, H., & Siegel, L. (1995). Reading, syntactic, and working memory skills of bilingual Portuguese-English Canadian children. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davidson, D., Raschke, V. R., & Pervez, J. (2010). Syntactic awareness in young monolingual and bilingual (Urdu-English) children. Cognitive Development, 25, 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (1974). Competence and performance in child language: Are children really competent to judge? Journal of Child Language, 1, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (1972). Early judgements of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children. Journal of Pscholinguistic Research, 4, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In J. Williams & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Demont, E. (1994). Développement métalinguistique et apprentissage de la lecture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Bourgogne, France.Google Scholar
  39. Demont, E., & Gombert, J. E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of recoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Elder, C., & Manwaring, D. (2004). The relationship knowledge and between metalinguistic learning outcomes among undergraduate students of Chinese. Language Awareness, 13, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ellis, N. C. (2008). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, knowledge about language (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 1–13). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Ellis, N. C. (1994). Introduction: Implicit and explicit language learning: An overview. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1–31). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  45. Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Evans, M. (1985). Self-initiated speech repairs: A reflection of communicative monitoring in young children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ferreira, V. S., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2006). Syntax and production. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 61–91). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ferreira, V. S., & Slevc, L. R. (2007). Grammatical encoding. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 453–469). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Foursha-Stevenson, C., & Nicoladis, E. (2011). Early emergence of syntactic awareness and cross-linguistic influence in bilingual children’s judgments. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 521–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Galambos, S. J., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1990). The effects of learning two languages on levels of metalinguistic awareness. Cognition, 34, 1–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Galambos, S. J., & Hakuta, K. (1988). Subject-specific and task specific characteristics of metalinguistic awareness in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gaux, C., & Gombert, J.-É. (1999a). Implicit and explicit syntactic knowledge and reading in pre-adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gaux, C., & Gombert, J.-É. (1999b). La conscience syntaxique chez les pré-adolescents: Question de méthodes. L’Année psychologique, 99, 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gombert, J.-É. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning to read: Implication as for subtypes of dyslexia. Current Psychology Letters, 10, 2–8.Google Scholar
  55. Gombert, J.-É. (1996). Activités métalinguistiques et acquisition d’une langue. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, 8, 41–55.Google Scholar
  56. Gombert, J.-É., & (1992). Metalinguistic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Translated from Gombert, J.-É., (1990). Développement métalinguistique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  57. Gombert, J.-É., Gaux, C., & Demont, E. (1994). Capacités métalinguistiques et lecture quels liens? Repères, 9, 61–73.Google Scholar
  58. Gorrell, P. (1999). Sentence processing. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 748–751). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Goto Butler, Y. (2002). Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles: An analysis of the metalinguistic knowledge used by Japanese students in acquiring the English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451–480.Google Scholar
  60. Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1996). The relationships between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third-grade children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 563–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Green, P. S., & Hecht, K. (1993). Pupil self-correction in oral communication in English as a foreign language. System, 21, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Green, P. S., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Griggs, P. (2002). À propos de l’effet de l’activité métalinguistique sur les processus de production en L2. In D. Véronique & F. Cicurel (Eds.), Discours, action et appropriation des langues (pp. 53–66). Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar
  64. Griggs, P. (1997). Metalinguistic work and the development of language use in communicative pairwork activities involving second language learners. In C. Perez & L. Diaz (Eds.), Views on the acquisition and use of a second language, EUROSLA’7.Proceedings (pp. 403–415). Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
  65. Gutiérrez, X. (2011). Knowledge representations underlying covert metalinguistic activity. A working hypothesis. Language Awareness, 20, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gutiérrez, X. (2008). What does metalinguistic activity in learners’ interaction during a collaborative L2 writing task look like? Modern Language Journal, 92, 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hakes, D. T. (1980). The development of metalinguistic abilities in children. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Harley, T. A. (2013). The psychology of language. From data to theory. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  69. Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hulstijn, J. (1990). A comparison between the information-processing and the analysis/control approaches to language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Jin-Ok, K. (2003). Notions métalinguistiques et activités cognitives dans l’analyse des temps passé composé et imparfait chez des apprenants coréens de français langue étrangère. Marges linguistiques, 4, 101–122.Google Scholar
  72. Jongejan, W., Verhoeven, L., & Siegel, L. (2007). Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first- and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 835–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1995). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kiss, K. É. (1995). Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Kurvers, J. J. H., Hout, R. W. N. M., & van Vallen, A. L. M. (2006). Discovering features of language: Metalinguisitc awareness of adult illiterates. In I. van de Craats, J. Kurvers, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Low-educated adult second language and literacy acquisition: Proceedings of the Inaugural Symposium (pp. 69–88). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
  77. Lefrançois, P., & Armand, F. (2003). The role of phonological and syntactic awareness in second-language reading: The case of Spanish-speaking learners of French. Reading and Writing: An interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lehrer, A. (2009). Prefixes in English Word Formation. Folia Linguistica, 29, 133–148.Google Scholar
  79. Lesaux, N. K., Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Reading and Writing, 19, 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lesaux, N. K., Rupp, A. A., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 821–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005–1119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  83. Levelt, W. J. M., Sinclair, A., & Jarvella, R. J. (1978). Causes and functions of linguistic awareness in language acquisition: Some introductory remarks. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 1–14). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2011). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1873–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). The development of reading skills in children with English as a second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lust, B., Flynn, S., & Foley, C. (1998). What children know about what they say: Elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children’s syntax. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee, & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), Methods for assessing children’ syntax (pp. 55–76). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  87. Mokhtari, K., & Thompson, B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness skills among fifth graders’. Reading Research & Instruction, 46, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Morgan-Short, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The neurocognition of second language. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 282–299). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ober, E., Garcia-Debanc, C., & Sanz-Lecina, E. (2004). Travailler l’observation réfléchie de la langue à travers la comparaison entre langues. Sur quels objets d’étude? À quelles conditions ? Repères, 29, 81–100.Google Scholar
  91. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pickering, M. J., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2006). Syntactic parsing. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 455–504). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Plaza, M. (2001). The interaction between phonological processing, syntactic awareness and reading: A longitudinal study from Kindergarten to Grade 1. First Language, 21, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2003). The interaction between phonological processing, syntactic awareness, and naming speed in the reading and spelling performance of first-grade children. Brain and Cognition, 53, 287–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Plaza, M., & Touzin, M. (2002). Expérience de dépistage des troubles du langage écrit dans un groupe de 267 enfants scolarisés en fin de CP. Approche neurologique des apprentissages ches l’enfant, 66, 20–28.Google Scholar
  97. Pratt, C., Tunmer, W. E., & Bowey, J. A. (1984). Children’s capacity to correct grammatical violations in sentences. Journal of Child Language, 11, 129–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., Hasting, A. S., & Carlyon, R. P. (2008). Syntax as a reflex: Neurophysiological evidence for early automaticity of grammatical processing. Brain and Language, 104, 244–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Renou, J. (2000). Learner accuracy and learner performance: The quest for a link. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rey-Debove, J. (1978). Le métalangage, étude linguistique du discours sur le langage. Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar
  101. Roehr, K. (2008). Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university-level L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 29, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Roehr, K. (2006). Metalinguistic knowledge in L2 task performance: A verbal protocol analysis. Language Awareness, 15, 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Salonen, T., & Laakso, M. (2009). Self-repair of speech by four-year-old Finnish children. Journal of Child Language, 36, 855–882.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Shtyrov, Y., Pulvermüller, F., Näätänen, R., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2003). Grammar processing outside the focus of attention: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1195–1206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Siegel, L. S. (1993). The development of reading. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 63–97). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  106. Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Simard, D. (2004). Using diaries as a way of promoting metalinguistic reflection among elementary school students. Language Awareness, 13, 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Simard, D., Fortier, V., & Foucambert, D. (2013). Measuring the metasyntactic ability of Portuguese speaking children living in a French-speaking environment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 19–31.Google Scholar
  109. Simard, D., & Fortier, V. (2007). Metasyntactic ability development among submersion and French native elementary school children: Investigation of task demand. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language processes (pp. 160–175). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  110. Simard, D., Foucambert, D., & Labelle, M. (2014). Examining the contribution of metasyntactic ability to reading comprehension among native and non-native speakers of French. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Slobin, D. I. (1978). A case study of early language awareness. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 45–54). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Smith-Lock, K. M., & Rubin, H. (1993). Phonological and morphological analysis skills in young children. Journal of Child Language, 20, 437–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sun, R., Merrill, E., & Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skill to explicit knowledge: A bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science, 25, 203–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Tarricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  115. Traxler, M. (2014). Trends in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 605–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Tsang, K. K.-S., & Stokes, S. F. (2001). Syntactic awareness of Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 28, 703–740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tunmer, W. E., Nesdale, A. R., & Wright, A. D. (1987). Syntactic awareness and reading acquisition. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141–178). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  119. Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105–122.Google Scholar
  121. Van Gompel, R., & Pickering, M. (2007). Syntactic parsing. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 289–307). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Vogel, S. A. (1974). Syntactic abilities in normal and dyslexic children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Willows, D. M., & Ryan, E. B. (1986). The development of grammatical sensitivity and its relationship to early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Willows, D. M., & Ryan, E. B. (1981). Differential utilization of syntactic and semantic information by skilled and less skilled readers in the intermediate grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Ziarko, H., Gagnon, M.-C., Mélançon, J., & Morin, M.-F. (2000). Manipuler les aspects morphologiques et syntaxiques de l’oral pour améliorer la compréhension de l’écrit. Québec français, 116, 44–47.Google Scholar
  127. Ziętek, A. A., & Roehr, K. (2011). Metalinguistic knowledge and cognitive style in Polish classroom learners of English. System, 39, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daphnée Simard
    • 1
  • Marie Labelle
    • 1
  • Annie Bergeron
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de linguistiqueUniversité du Québec à MontréalSuccursale Centre Ville, MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations