Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 191–204 | Cite as

Do Phonological Constraints on the Spoken Word Affect Visual Lexical Decision?

  • Yang Lee
  • Miguel A. MorenoEmail author
  • Claudia Carello
  • M. T. Turvey
Article

Abstract

Reading a word may involve the spoken language in two ways: in the conversion of letters to phonemes according to the conventions of the language’s writing system and the assimilation of phonemes according to the language’s constraints on speaking. If so, then words that require assimilation when uttered would require a change in the phonemes produced by grapheme-phoneme conversion when read. In two experiments, each involving 40 fluent readers, we compared visual lexical decision on Korean orthographic forms that would require such a change (C stimuli) or not (NC stimuli). We found that NC words were accepted faster than C words, and C nonwords were rejected faster than NC nonwords. The results suggest that phoneme-to-phoneme transformations involved in uttering a word may also be involved in visually identifying the word.

Keywords

Phonology Consonant assimilation Visual word recognition Phonological constraints 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson M., Goldinger S. (1997) What the reader’s eye tells the mind’s ear: silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics 59: 1059–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berent I., Shimron J., Vaknin V. (2001) Phonological constraints on reading: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Journal of Memory and Language 44: 644–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Frost R. (1998) Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin 123: 71–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. KAIST (1999). Kaist concordance program [On-line]. Available: http://csfive.kaist.ac.kr/kcp/.
  6. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  7. Lee Y., Moreno M., Park H.-Y., Carello C., Turvey M. T. (2006) Phonological assimilation and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35: 513–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lukatela G., Eaton T., Sabadini L., Turvey M. T. (2004) Vowel duration affects visual word identification: Evidence that the mediating phonology is phonetically informed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30: 151–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lukatela G., Eaton T., Lee C., Carello C., Turvey M. T. (2002) Equal homophonic priming with words and pseudowords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28: 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lukatela G., Frost S., Turvey M. T. (1999) Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 775–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Seo, S. (1998). Frequency Tables above 7 frequencies of Modern Korean Words for Yensei-word cluster 1–9. Yeonsei Univ. Language Information Research Center (Internal Report).Google Scholar
  12. Sorim M. (2006) Essence Korean-English dictionary: Deluxe (4th ed.). Minjung Sorim Publishers, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  13. Sung K. (1995) New ace: Korean language dictionary. Kum Sung Textbook Co, SeoulGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Miguel A. Moreno
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Claudia Carello
    • 2
    • 4
  • M. T. Turvey
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Gyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Haskins LaboratoriesNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Texas A & M-Corpus ChristiCorpus ChristiUSA
  4. 4.University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations