Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 155–176 | Cite as

Children’s Knowledge of the Quantifier Dou in Mandarin Chinese

Article

Abstract

The quantifier dou (roughly corresponding to English ‘all’) in Mandarin Chinese has been the topic of much discussion in the theoretical literature. This study investigated children’s knowledge of this quantifier using a new methodological technique, which we dubbed the Question-Statement Task. Three questions were addressed: (i) whether young Mandarin-speaking children know that dou is a universal quantifier that quantifies over the elements to its left, (ii) whether they know that dou is an adverb of quantification (Q-adverb) which can (unselectively) bind any variable in its domain, and (iii) whether they know that dou can quantify over wh-words. The main finding was that, by age four, Mandarin-speaking children have the relevant knowledge. The results reflect the early availability of adult-like linguistic knowledge of dou-quantification.

Keywords

Dou-quantification Universal Quantifier Wh-words Child language Mandarin chinese 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks P. J., Braine M. D. S. (1996) What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each?. Cognition 60: 235–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng, L. L.-S. (1991). On the typology of wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Cheng L. L.-S. (1994) Wh-words as polarity items. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 2: 615–640Google Scholar
  4. Cheng L. L.-S. (1995) On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 197–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng L. L.-S., Huang C.-T. J. (1996) Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics 4: 121–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crain S., Steedman M. (1985) On not being led up the garden-path: The use of co context by the psychological parser. In: Dowty D., Kartunnen L., Zwicky A. (eds) Natural language parsing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 320–358Google Scholar
  7. Crain S., Thornton R. (1998) Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Crain S., Thornton R., Boster C., Conway L., Lillo-Martin D., Woodams E. (1996) Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition 5: 83–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frazier L., Fodor J. D. (1978) The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6: 291–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  11. Hsieh M.-L. (2008) Acquiring scope: A longitudinal study. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 6: 55–96Google Scholar
  12. Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  13. Jia, X.-D., Brooks, P. J., & Braine, M. D. S. (1996). A study of Chinese children’s comprehension of universal quantifiers. In E. Clark, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 27th annual child language research forum (pp. 167–173). Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
  14. Jing, C. Y., Crain, S., & Hsu, C. F. (2005). The interpretation of focus in Chinese: Child vs. adult language. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 165–190). Tokyo: Hituzi Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Karttunen L. (1977) Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, T. H.-T. (1986). Studies on quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis D. (1975) Adverbs of quantification. In: Keenan E. (ed.) Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  18. Li Y.-H. A. (1992) Indefinite wh in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 125–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, J.-W. (1996). Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  20. Lin J.-W. (1998) On existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 219–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pan H.-H. (2006) Focus, tripartite structure, and the semantic interpretation of Mandarin dou. Research and Exploration on Grammar 13: 163–184 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Pan, H.-H., & Jiang, Y. (1997). NP interpretation and donkey sentences in Chinese. Paper presented at the Summer Institute of the Linguistic Society of America, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  23. Partee B. H. (1984) Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Russell B. (1948) Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Xiang M. (2008) Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 227–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie Centre for Cognitive ScienceMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations