Comparing Ease-of-Processing Values of the Same Set of Words for Native English Speakers and Japanese Learners of English

Article
  • 140 Downloads

Abstract

Ease of processing of 3,969 English words for native speakers and Japanese learners was investigated using lexical decision and naming latencies taken from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al. The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords, 2002) and accuracy of English word translation by Japanese university students (Takashima, H. Eigo goi chishiki no keisei [The structure of English lexical knowledge of Japanese college students], 2002). Correlations among these ease-of-processing values were all significant, suggesting substantial commonalities between native English speakers and Japanese learners. Regression analyses, however, showed that some factors differentially affect ease of processing for natives and Japanese. Comparison of the predicted and the observed values of translation accuracy revealed specific differences of lexical knowledge between native speakers and Japanese learners. Loanword effect on translation accuracy and translation errors similar to dyslexic/aphasic reading errors were observed, suggesting the possibility of insufficient orthographic/phonological activation and the possibility of the use of first language phonological representations. The implications of these results for the study of second/foreign language lexical processing are discussed.

Keywords

Word translation Second/foreign language lexical processing Commonalities between native and nonnative lexical processing Ease-of-processing 

References

  1. Akamatsu, N. (2002). A similarity in word-recognition procedures among second language readers with different first language backgrounds. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 117–133. doi:10.1017/S0142716402000061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1990). Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 231–237. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.2.231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., et al. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Retrieved July 28, 2007, from http://elexicon.wustl.edu/, Washington University.
  4. Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15, 208–216.Google Scholar
  5. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26, 95–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85–95. doi:10.1080/14640747308400325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505.Google Scholar
  9. Connie, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1084–1096. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Caño, A. (2005). On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language, 94, 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Coulmas, F. (1996). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. De Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001–1018. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Groot, A. M. B., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & van den Eijnden, E. (2002). Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 91–124. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Groot, A. M. B., Dannenburg, L., & Van Hell, J. G. (1994). Forward and backward word translation by bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 600–629. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.2.256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395–427.Google Scholar
  18. Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2004). Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 165–181. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505–529. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687–715. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90044-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koda, K. (1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recoding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Konishi, T., & Minamide, K. (1994). Taishukan’s GENIUS English-Japanese dictionary (2nd ed.). Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
  23. Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 12–31. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.Google Scholar
  25. McRae, K., Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 43–65. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90009-O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 116–133. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76(1), Part 2.Google Scholar
  29. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90270-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strain, E., & Herdman, C. M. (1999). Imageability effects in word naming: An individual differences analysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 347–359. doi:10.1037/h0087322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1140–1154. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Takashima, H. (2002). Eigo goi chishiki no keisei [The structure of English lexical knowledge of Japanese college students]. Tokyo: Yushodo.Google Scholar
  33. Takashima, H. (2007). Bogowasha to nihon-jin gakushu-sha no eigo goi joho-shori ni okeru goi tokusei no sho-kouka [Effects of psycholinguistic traits of words on English lexical processing for native speakers and Japanese learners]. Paper presented at the 33rd annual conference of Japan Society of English Language Education.Google Scholar
  34. Takashima, H., & Yamada, J. (1997). Eigo shakuyogo no goi hantei senji to ondoku senji [Lexical decision and naming latency of English loans and nonloans for Japanese speakers]. Chugoku Academic Society of English Language Education Research Bulletin, 27, 161–164.Google Scholar
  35. Takashima, H., Yamada, J., Kunimoto, K., & Takeuchi, E. (2000). Gosengo eno chosen eigo mentaru rekishikon no tankyu juzoku hensu no kaishaku kara dokuritsu hensu e [Challenge to analyze 5,000 words as independent variables, not as dependent variables: Exploring English lexical representations for Japanese learners]. Studies in English Language Education: A Bulletin for Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, 43, 31–39.Google Scholar
  36. Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, M., & Koda, K. (2007). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 57(Suppl. 1), 201–222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00416.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory & Cognition, 12, 293–305.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, M. D. (1988). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine readable dictionary, version 2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 6–11.Google Scholar
  40. Yamada, J., Takashima, H., Yamazaki, M. (1998). Effect of ease-of-acquisition on naming latency for Japanese Kanji: A reanalysis of Yamazaki et al.’s (1997) data. Psychological Reports, 83, 991–1002. doi:10.2466/PR0.83.7.991-1002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamazaki, M., Ellis, A. W., Morrison, C. M., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (1997). Two age of acquisition effects in the reading of Japanese Kanji. The British Journal of Psychology, 88, 407–421.Google Scholar
  42. Yokokawa, H. (Ed.). (2006). Kyo-iku, kenkyu no tameno dai ni gengo database: nihon-jin eigo gakushusha no eitango shinmitsudo (moji hen) [Familiarity for English words of Japanese EFL learners: L2 database for research and education]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publisher.Google Scholar
  43. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1–29. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600–618.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and WelfareThe Prefectural University of HiroshimaMiharaJapan

Personalised recommendations