Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 443–452 | Cite as

Differences in Noun and Verb Processing in Lexical Decision Cannot be Attributed to Word Form and Morphological Complexity Alone

Original Article

Abstract

It has been suggested that the effect of word category in noun and verb processing reflects typical word class properties, which can be characterized in terms of semantic as well as syntactic and morphological features. The present study is aimed at differentiating and discussing the relative contribution of these aspects with a main focus on syntactic and morphological processing. Experiment 1 established a processing advantage for nouns in German visual lexical decision, using nouns denoting biological and man-made objects as compared to transitive and intransitive verbs. Experiment 2 showed that the noun advantage persisted even when the morphological differences between word categories were reduced by using identical suffixes in nouns and verbs. Overall results suggest that the processing differences cannot be reduced to variables such as frequency, word form, or morphological complexity. Reaction time differences between transitive and intransitive verbs strengthen the role of syntactic information. In line with previous accounts the observed effects are discussed in terms of a category-specific combination of linguistic parameters.

Keywords

Noun and verb processing Visual lexical decision Morphological processing Biological and manmade objects Transitive and intransitive verbs Noun advantage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggujaro S., Crepaldi D., Pistarini C., Taricco M., Luzzatti C. (2006) Neuro-anatomical correlates of impaired retrieval of verbs and nouns: Interaction of grammatical class, imageability and actionality. Journal of Neurolinguistics 19: 175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CDROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
  3. Black M., Chiat S. (2003) Noun-verb dissociations: A multifaceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16: 231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiarello C., Liu S., Shears C., Kacinik N. (2002) Differential asymmetries for recognizing nouns and verbs: Where are they?. Neuropsychology 16(1): 35–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Bleser R., Kauschke C. (2003) Acquisition and loss of nouns and verbs: Parallel or divergent patterns? . Journal of Neurolinguistics 16(2/3): 213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dietrich D., Waller C., Johannes S., Wieringa B.M., Emrich H.M., Münte T.F. (2001) Differential effects of emotional content on event-related potentials in word recognition memory. Neuropsychobiology 43: 96–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans N. (2000) Word classes in the world’s languages. In: Booij G., Lehmann C., Mugdan J.(eds) Morphologie Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp 708–731Google Scholar
  8. Humphreys G.W., Price C., Riddoch M.J. (1999) From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Research 62: 118–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonkers R., Bastiaanse R. (1996) The influence of instrumentality and transitivity on action naming in Broca’s and Anomic Aphasia. Brain and Language 55: 37–39Google Scholar
  10. Jonkers R., Bastiaanse R. (1998) How selective are selective word class deficits? Two case studies of action and object naming. Aphasiology 12: 193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kauschke, C., & von Frankenberg, J. (2008). The differential influence of lexical variables on naming latencies in German. A study on noun and verb picture naming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Kim M., Thompson C.K. (2000) Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organisation. Brain and Language 74: 1–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Köpke K.M. (1993) Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen. Versuch einer kognitiven Morphologie. Narr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  14. Laaha S., Ravid D., Korecky-Kröll K., Laaha G., Dressler W.U. (2006) Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default?. Journal of Child Language 33: 271–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lloyd-Jones T., Humphreys G.W. (1997) Perceptual differentiation as so source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition 25(1): 18–35Google Scholar
  16. Lloyd-Jones T., Humphreys G.W. (1997) Categorizing chairs and naming pears: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming. Memory & Cognition 25(5): 606–624Google Scholar
  17. Maguire M.J., Hirsh-Pasek K., Michnick Golinkoff R. (2006) A unified theory of word learning: Putting verb acquisition in context. In: Hirsh-Pasek K., Michnick Golinkoff R.(eds) Action meets word: How children learn verbs. University Press, Oxford, pp 364–391Google Scholar
  18. Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2003). Inequality between the classes: Phonological and distributional typicality as predictors of lexical processing. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 810–815.Google Scholar
  19. Rösler F., Streb J., Haan H. (2001) Event-related brain potentials evoked by verbs and nouns in a primed lexical decision task. Psychophysiology 38: 694–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sereno J.A. (1999) Hemispheric differences in grammatical class. Brain and Language 70: 13–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shapiro K.A., Mottaghy F.M., Schiller N.O., Poeppel T.D., Flüß M.O., Müller H.-W., Caramazza A., Krause B.J. (2005) Dissociating neural correlates for nouns and verbs. NeuroImage 24: 1058–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Szekely A., D’Amico S., Devescovi A., Federmeier K., Herron D., Iyer G., Jacobsen T., Bates E. (2005) Timed action and object naming. Cortex 41(1): 7–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thompson C.K., Lange K.L., Schneider S.L., Shapiro L.P. (1997) Agrammatic and non-brain-damaged subjects’ verb and verb argument structure production. Aphasiology 11(4/5): 473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tyler L.K., Russel R., Fadili J., Moss H.E. (2001) The neural representations of nouns and verbs: PET studies. Brain 124: 1619–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tyler L.K., Bright P., Fletcher P., Stamatakis E.A. (2004) Neural processing of nouns and verbs: The role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia 42: 512–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of German LinguisticsPhilipps-Universität MarburgMarburgGermany
  2. 2.Clinical Linguistic UnitUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations