Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 243–257

The Differential Influence of Lexical Parameters on Naming Latencies in German. A Study on Noun and Verb Picture Naming

Original Research

Abstract

The present study investigates the effects of word category (nouns versus verbs) and their subcategories on naming latencies in German, with a focus on the influence of lexical parameters on naming performance. The experimental material met linguistic construction criteria and was carefully matched for age of spontaneous production, frequency, and name agreement. Additional lexical parameters (objective age-of-acquisition, word length, visual complexity, imageability) were obtained. The results demonstrated a clear effect of word category on naming latencies. This effect was supported by two different observations. First, there was evidence for category and subcategory effects in naming: nouns were named faster than verbs, and intransitive verbs were named faster than transitive verbs. Second, while objective age-of-acquisition (naming age) turned out to be an important predictor of reaction times for both word categories, naming latencies for nouns and verbs were affected differentially by other lexical parameters. The results are discussed with respect to current controversies on the noun–verb-asymmetry.

Keywords

Picture naming Noun Verb Age of acquisition Action Object Reaction times 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggujaro S., Crepaldi D., Pistarini C., Taricco M., Luzzatti C. (2006). Neuro-anatomical correlates of impaired retrieval of verbs and nouns: Interaction of grammatical class, imageability and actionality. Journal of Neurolinguistics 19, 175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry C., Morrison C.M., Ellis A.W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age-of-acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A, 560–585Google Scholar
  4. Bird H., Howard D., Franklin S. (2000a). Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain and Language 72, 246–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird H., Lambon Ralph M.A., Patterson K., Hodges J.R. (2000b). The rise and fall of frequency and imageability: Noun and verb production in semantic dementia. Brain and Language 73, 17–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black M., Chiat S. (2000). Putting thoughts into verbs: Developmental and acquired impairments. In: Best W., Bryan K., Maxim J. (eds) Semantic Processing Theory and Practice. London, Whurr Publishers, pp. 52–79Google Scholar
  7. Black M., Chiat S. (2003). Noun–verb dissociations: A multifaceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16, 231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogka N., Masterson J., Druks J., Fragkioudaki M., Chatziprokopiou E.-S., Economou K. (2003). Object and action picture naming in English and Greek. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 15(3): 371–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornstein M.H., Cote L.R., Maital S., Painter K., Park S.-Y., Pascual L., Pecheux M.-G., Ruel J., Venuti P., Vyt A. (2004). Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English. Child Development 75(4): 1115–1139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brace N., Kemp R., Snelgar R. (2006). SPSS for psychologists. A guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. London, PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen S., Bates E. (1998). The dissociation between nouns and verbs in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia: Findings from chinese. Aphasiology 12, 5–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiarello C., Liu S., Shears C., Kacinik N. (2002). Differential asymmetries for recognizing nouns and verbs: Where are they? Neuropsychology 16(1): 35–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colombo L., Burani C. (2001). The influence of age of acquisition, root frequency, and context availability in processing nouns and verbs. Brain and Language 81, 398–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cuetos F., Alija M. (2003). Normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behavior Research Measures, Instruments, & Computers 3571, 168–177Google Scholar
  15. Damasio A., Tranel D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 90, 4957–4960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniele A., Giustolisi L., Silveri M., Colosimo C., Gainotti G. (1994). Evidence for a possible neuroanatomical basis for lexical processing of nouns and verbs. Neuropsychologia 32, 1325–1341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidoff J., Masterson J. (1995). The development of picture naming: Differences between verbs and nouns. Journal of Neurolinguistics 9, 69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Bleser R., Kauschke C. (2003). Acquisition and loss of nouns and verbs: Parallel or divergent patterns?. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16(2/3): 213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Druks J. (2002). Verbs and nouns—a review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics 15, 289–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duden in 12 Bänden: das Aussprachewörterbuch (1998). Bibliographisches Institut & F.A. Brockhaus AG.Google Scholar
  21. Gentner D. (1981) Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory 4, 161–178Google Scholar
  22. Gentner D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In: Kuczaj S. (eds) Language development, Vol. 2: Language, thought and culture. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 301–334Google Scholar
  23. Gentner D., Boroditsky L. (2000). Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In: Bowerman M., Levinson S.C. (eds) Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–256Google Scholar
  24. Ghyselinck M., Lewis M.B., Brysbaert M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica 115, 43–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirsh-Pasek K., Michnick Golinkoff R. (2006) Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford, University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Humphreys G.W., Price C., Riddoch M.J. (1999). From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Research 62, 118–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jonkers R. (2000). Verb-finding problems in Broca's aphasics: The influence of transitivity. In: Bastiaanse R., Grodzinsky R.J. (eds) Grammatical disorders in aphasia: A neurolinguistic perspective. London, Whurr Publishers, pp. 105–122Google Scholar
  28. Jonkers R., Bastiaanse R. (1998). How selective are selective word class deficits? Two case studies of action and object naming. Aphasiology 12, 245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kauschke C. (2007). Erwerb und Verarbeitung von Nomen und Verben. Tübingen, NiemeyerGoogle Scholar
  30. Kauschke C., Lee H.-W., Pae S. (2007). Similarities in noun and verb acquisition—a crosslinguistic study of children learning German, Korean, and Turkish. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(7): 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim M., Thompson C.K. (2000). Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organisation. Brain and Language 74, 1–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laiacona M., Caramazza A. (2004). The noun/verb dissociation in language production: Varieties of causes. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 103–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lloyd-Jones T., Humphreys G.W. (1997a). Perceptual differentiation as so source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition 25(1): 18–35Google Scholar
  34. Lloyd-Jones T., Humphreys G.W. (1997b). Categorizing chairs and naming pears: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming. Memory & Cognition 25(5): 606–624Google Scholar
  35. Luzzatti C., Raggi R., Zonca G., Pistarini C., Contardi A., Pinna G.D. (2002). Verb–noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: The role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and Language 81, 432–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marshall J. (2003). Noun–verb dissociations—evidence from acquisition and developmental and acquired impairments. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16, 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miceli G., Silveri M., Nocentini O., Caramazza A. (1988). Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs. Aphasiology 2, 351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2003). Inequality between the classes: Phonological and distributional typicality as predictors of lexical processing. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 810–815).Google Scholar
  39. Morrison C.M., Champell T.D., Ellis A.W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A, 528–559Google Scholar
  40. Morrison C.M., Ellis A.W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology 91, 167–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perani D., Cappa S., Schnur T., Tettamanti M., Collina S., Rosa M.M., Fazio F. (1999). The neural correlates of verb and noun processing. A PET study. Brain 122, 2337–2344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Postler, J. (2006). Die neuronale Verarbeitung von Nomen und Verben. Dissertation. University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
  43. Sereno J.A. (1999). Hemispheric differences in grammatical class. Brain and Language 70, 13–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shapiro K.A., Mottaghy F.M., Schiller N.O., Poeppel T.D., Flüß M.O., Müller H.-W., Caramazza A., Krause B. (2005). Dissociating neural correlates for nouns and verbs. NeuroImage 24, 1058–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 6, 174–215Google Scholar
  46. Sörös P., Cornelissen K., Laine M., Salmelin R. (2003). Naming actions and objects: Cortical dynamics in healthy adults and in a anomic patient with a dissociation in action/object naming. Neuroimage 19, 1787–1801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Szekely A., D’Amico S., Devescovi A., Federmeier K., Herron D., Iyer G., Jacobsen T., Bates E. (2005). Timed action and object naming. Cortex 41(1): 7–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson C.K., Lange K.L., Schneider S.L., Shapiro L.P. (1997). Agrammatic and non-brain-damaged subjects’ verb and verb argument structure production. Aphasiology 11(4/5): 473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tranel D., Martin C., Damasio H., Grabowski T., Hichwa R. (2005). Effects of noun–verb homonymy on the neural correlates of naming concrete entities and actions. Brain and Language 92, 288–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tyler L.K., Russel R., Fadili J., Moss H.E. (2001). The neural representations of nouns and verbs: PET studies. Brain 124, 1619–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tyler L.K., Stamatakis E.A., Dick E., Bright P., Fletcher P., Moss H. (2003). Objects and their actions: Evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system. NeuroImage 18, 542–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tyler L.K., Bright P., Fletcher P., Stamatakis E.A. (2004). Neural processing of nouns and verbs: The role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia 42, 512–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Germanic LinguisticsUniversity of MarburgMarburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations