Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 115–124 | Cite as

Expressive Electronic Journal Writing: Freedom of Communication for Survivors of Acquired Brain Injury

Article

Abstract

In addition to the impaired ability to effectively communicate, adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) also experience high incidences of depression, social isolation, and decreased quality of life. Expressive writing programs have been shown to be effective in alleviating these concomitant impairments in other populations including incarcerated inmates (Lane, Writing as a road to self-discovery, F & W, Cincinnati 1993). In addition, computer applications such as email have been suggested as an effective means of improving communication and social isolation in adults with brain injury (Sohlberg et al. [2003]. Brain Injury, 17(7), 609–629). This investigation examines the effects of on-line expressive journal writing on the communication, emotional status, social integration and quality of life of individuals with brain injury.

Keywords

Expressive writing Brain injury Emotional status Social integration Quality of life 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck A.T., Steer R.A., Brown G.K. (1996). Beck depression inventory. San Antonio, The Psychological CorporationGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown M., Vandergoot D. (1998). Quality of life for individuals with traumatic brain injury: Comparison with others in the community. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 13, 1–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001). Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults: United States, 1999. MMWR, 50, 120–125.Google Scholar
  4. Fleminger S., Oliver D.L., Williams W., Evans J. (2003). The neuropsychiatry of depression after brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(1–2): 65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galski T., Tompkins C., Johnston M.V. (1998). Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 12(9): 769–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glenn M.B., Goldstein R., Selleck E.A., Rotman M. (2004). Characteristics of facility-based community integration programs for people with brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 19(6): 482–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Glenn M.B., O’Neil-Pirozzi T., Goldstein R., Burke D., Jacob L. (2001). Depression amongst outpatients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 15(9): 811–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green A., Felmingham K., Baguley I.J., Slewa-Younan S., Simpson S. (2001). The clinical utility of the Beck Depression Inventory after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 15(12): 1021–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helfgott D., Westhaver M. (2005). Inspiration: Version 7.6. Portland, Inspiration Software, IncGoogle Scholar
  10. Helm-Estabrooks N., Hotz G. (1991). Brief test of head injury. Chicago, ProEdGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreutzer J.S., Seel R.T., Gourley E. (2001). The prevalence and symptom rates of depression after traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive examination. Brain Injury 15(7): 563–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lane, B. (1993). Writing as a road to self-discovery. Cincinnati: F & W.Google Scholar
  13. Lezak M.D., O’brien K.P. (1998). Longitudinal study of emotional, social and physical changes after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Learning Disability 21, 456–463Google Scholar
  14. Polacco P. (1994). Pink and say. New York, Philomel BooksGoogle Scholar
  15. Silverstein S. (1969). The giving tree. New York, Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
  16. Sohlberg M.M., Ehlhardt L.A., Fickas S., Sutcliffe A. (2003). A pilot study exploring electronic (or e-mail) mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Injury 17(7): 609–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Todis B., Sohlberg M.M., Hood D., Fickas S. (2005). Making electronic mail accessible: Perspectives of people with acquired cognitive impairments, caregivers and professionals. Brain Injury, 19(6): 389–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Uomoto J.M. (2004). The contribution of the neuropsychological evaluation to traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. In: Ashley M.J. (ed). Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitative treatment and case management. Boca Raton, CRC Press, pp. 581–611Google Scholar
  19. Willer B., Rosenthal M., Griffith E.R., Bond M.R., Miller J.D., Kreutzer J. (1993). Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 8, 75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication Sciences and DisordersUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations