Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 87–113 | Cite as

Activating Basic Category Exemplars in Sentence Contexts: A Dynamical Account

  • Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi
  • Lewis P. Shapiro
  • Betty Tuller
  • J. A. Scott. Kelso
Original Article


This paper examines the influence of context on the processing of category names embedded in sentences. The investigation focuses on the nature of information available immediately after such a word is heard as well as on the dynamics of adaptation to context. An on-line method (Cross Modal Lexical Priming) was used to trace how this process unfolds in time. We found that the information available immediately after a category word is presented is not altered by the sentence context in which the word is immersed. Rather, the structure of availability of particular exemplars of the category resembles the typicality structure of a conceptual representation. The adaptation to context occurs later (between 300 and 450 ms after the category word) and takes the form of a rapid reorganization of the structure rather than a gradual activation of a contextually relevant exemplar. We claim that such data is best accounted for in a dynamical framework, where a coherent global structure emerges through locally guided self-organization.


On-line semantic adaptation Category structure Typicality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson R.C., Pichert J.W., Goetz E.T., Schallert D.L., Stevens K.V., Trollip S.R. (1976). Instantiation of general terms. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 15(6): 667–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson R.C., Shiffrin Z. (1980). The meaning of words in context. In: Spiro R.J., Bruice B.C., Brewer W.F., (eds). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 331–348Google Scholar
  3. Barsalou L.W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory and Cognition 20, 82–83Google Scholar
  4. Barsalou L.W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11(3): 211–227Google Scholar
  5. Barsalou L.W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In: U. Neisser (eds). Concepts and conceptual development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 101–140Google Scholar
  6. Barwise J., Perry J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Borsky S., Tuller B., Shapiro L.P. (1998). How to milk a coat: The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103, 2670–2676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner J.S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York, NortonGoogle Scholar
  9. Case P., Tuller B., Ding M., Kelso J.A.S. (1995). Evaluation of a dynamical model of speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 57(7): 977–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins A.M., Quillian M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cree G.S., McRae K., McNorgan C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science 23(3): 371–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cussins A. (1990). The connectionist construction of concepts. In: Boden M.A., (eds). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 368—440Google Scholar
  13. Duffy S.A., Morris R.K., Rayner K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 429–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fodor J.A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Forster K.I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of language processor. In: Cooper W., Walker E., (eds). Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies. Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Forster K.I. (1985). Lexical acquisition and the modular lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 1(2): 87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Francis W.N., Kucera H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
  18. Fujihara N., Nageishi Y., Koyama S., Nakajima Y. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for the typicality effect of human cognitive categorization. International Journal of Psychophysiology 29, 65–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haken H. (1983). Synergetics, an introduction: Non-equilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology (3rd edn). Berlin, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  20. Haken H. (1990). Synergetics as a tool for the conceptualization and mathematization of cognition and behavior–How far can we go?. In: Haken H., Stadler M., (eds). Synergetics of cognition. Springer, Berlin, pp. 2—31Google Scholar
  21. Hampton J.A. (1998). Similarity based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories. Cognition 56, 137–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hock H., Kelso J.A.S., Schöner G. (1993). Bistability, hysteresis and loss of temporal stability in the perceptual organization of apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19(1): 63–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hopfield J.J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 81, 6871–6875Google Scholar
  24. Jeka J.J., Kelso J.A.S. (1989). The dynamic approach to coordinated behavior: A tutorial review. In: Wallace S.A., (eds). Perspectives on the coordination of movement. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  25. Kawamoto A.H. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 474–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelso J.A.S. (1990). Phase transitions: Foundations of behavior. In: Haken H., Stadler M., (eds). Synergetics of cognition. Springer, Berlin, pp. 249—268Google Scholar
  27. Kelso J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. MIT press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelso J.A.S., Case P., Holroyd T., Horvath E., Rączaszek J., Tuller B., Ding M. (1994). Multistability and metastability in perceptual and brain dynamics. In: Kruse P., Stadler M., (eds). Ambiguity in mind and nature. Berlin, Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelso J.A.S., Scholz J.P., Schöner G. (1986). Non-equilibrium phase transitions in coordinated biological motion: Critical fluctuations. Physics Letters A118, 279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knapp, A. G., & Anderson, J.A. Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 10(4): 616–637Google Scholar
  31. Łozowski P. (2000). Vagueness in language. Lublin, UMCS PressGoogle Scholar
  32. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101(4): 676–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8, 1–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K. (1987). Against modularity. In: Garfield J.L. (eds). Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 37–62Google Scholar
  35. McEvoy C.L., Nelson D.L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes. American Journal of Psychology 95, 581–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McRae K., de Sa V., Seidenberg M.S. (1997). On nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126, 99–130Google Scholar
  37. Medin, D. L., & Wattenmaker, W. D. (1987). Category cohesiveness, theories, and cognitive archeology. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Emory symposia in cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 25–62). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mervis C.B., Rosch E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology 32, 89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neely J.H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106, 226–254Google Scholar
  40. Nicol J., Swinney D., Love T., Hald L. (2006). The on-line study of sentence processing: examination of dual-task paradigms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(3): 215–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Onifer W., Swinney D. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition 9(3): 225–236Google Scholar
  42. Posner M.I., KeeleS.W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77(3): 353–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rączaszek J. (1996). A dynamic view of the processing of ambiguous expressions. Polish Psychological Bulletin 27, 189–199Google Scholar
  44. Rączaszek J., Tuller B., Shapiro L.P., Case P., Kelso J.A.S. (1999). Categorization of ambiguous sentences as a function of a changing prosodic parameter: A dynamical approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28(4): 367–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rayner K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124, 372–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rips L.J., Smith E.E., Shoben E.J. (1978). Semantic composition in sentence verification. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 17(4): 375–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosch E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 103, 192–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosch E. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8(3): 382–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roth E.M., Shoben E.J. (1983). The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 15, 346–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Schöner G., Kelso J.A.S. (1988). Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science 239, 1513–1520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schreiber A., Rousset S., Tiberghien G. (1990). Context effects in face recognition: Below response bias. The contribution of a simulation. In: Caverni J.-P., Fabre J.-M., Gonzalez M., (eds). Cognitive biases. Advances in psychology. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 243–274Google Scholar
  53. Seidenberg M.S., Tannenhaus M.K., Leiman J.M., Bienkowski M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 14, 489–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shapiro L.P., Hestvik A., Lesan L., Garcia A.R. (2003). Charting the time-course of sentence processing: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 49, 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shapiro L.P., Swinney D.A., Borsky S. (1998). On-line examination of language performance in normal and neurologically-impaired adults. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 7, 49–60Google Scholar
  56. Simpson G.B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 120–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simpson G.B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin 96, 316–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swaab T., Brown C., Hagoort P. (2003). Understanding words in sentence contexts: The time course of ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language 86, 326–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Swinney D.A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 18(6): 645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Swinney D., Osterhout L. (1990). Inference generation during auditory language comprehension. In: Graesser A.C., Bower G.H., (eds). Inference and text comprehension: The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25). San Diego: Academic Press,Google Scholar
  61. Tabor W., Galantucci B., Richardson D. (2003). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tabor W., Hutchins S. (2004). Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging-in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, 431–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tabossi P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 324–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tannenhaus M.K., Lucas M.M. (1987). Context effects in lexical processing. Cognition 25, 213–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tuller B., Case P., Kelso J.A.S., Ding M. (1994). The nonlinear dynamics of categorical perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20(1):3–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tuller B., Kelso J.A.S. (1990). Phase transitions in speech production and their perceptual consequences. In: Jeannerod M., (eds). Attention and performance, XIII. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 429–452Google Scholar
  67. Turvey M.T. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist 45, 938–953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitney P. (1986). Processing category terms in context: Instantiations as inferences. Memory and Cognition 14(1): 39–48Google Scholar
  69. Whitney P., Kellas (1984). Processing category terms in context: instantiation and the structure of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 10: 95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whitney P., McKay T., Kellas G., Emerson W.A. (1985). Semantic activation of noun concepts in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 11(1): 126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Widrow, G., & Hoff, M. E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. In Institute of Radio Engineers, Western Electronic Show and Convention, Convention Record (Vol. 4, pp. 96–104).Google Scholar
  72. Wittgenstein L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, B. BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi
    • 1
  • Lewis P. Shapiro
    • 2
  • Betty Tuller
    • 3
  • J. A. Scott. Kelso
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognitive PsychologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.School of Speech, Language, and Hearing SciencesSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Center for Complex Systems and Brain SciencesFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations