Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 255–272 | Cite as

Morphological Development in the Speech of a Persian–English Bilingual Child

Origianl Article

Abstract

The present study aims at testing the two dominant hypotheses regarding the development of inflections and other functional categories namely the Structure-Building Model and the Continuity Hypothesis within the generative theory. According to the first view, functional categories are entirely absent in children’s early grammars, which contain only projections of lexical categories, most importantly ‘nouns’ and ‘verbs.’ This hypothesis holds that utterances produced by children are actually small clauses or verb phrases, and functional categories such as copula, determiners, and genitive are not acquired during the single-word or early multiword stages, but are implemented in the course of further acquisition, at around age 2 or later. The proponents of the second, i.e., the ‘Continuity Hypothesis,’ on the other hand, argue that functional categories are in fact present in children’s early syntax. These two hypotheses will be tested here against empirical data in English and Persian. Thus, longitudinal data will be provided on the acquisition of a few morphemes in the two languages acquired by the subject of the present study (i.e., English and Persian) including determiners, plural marker, genitive, and copula. The significance of the present study lies in the fact that it provides data on two typologically different languages in bilingual first language acquisition and thereby making a contribution to the field.

Keywords

Bilingual first-language acquisition Morphology Persian English 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldridge M. (1989). The acquisition of INFL. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguisitics Club PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnberg L. (1987). Raising children bilingually: Thepre-school years. Clevedon, Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayoun D. (2003). Parameter setting in language acquisition. New York, ContinuumGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett-Kastor T. (1988). Analyzing children’s language: Methods and theories. Oxford, Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergman C.R. (1976). Interference vs. independent development in infant bilingualism. In: Keller D., Teschner R., Viera S. (eds), Bilingualism in bicentennial and beyond. New York, Bilingual Press, pp. 86–96Google Scholar
  6. Bernardini P., Schlyter S. (2004). Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The Ivy Hypothesis. Bilingualism 7: 49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burling R. (1978). Language development of a Garo and English-speaking child. In: Hatch E.(eds), Second language acquisition: A book of readings. Rowley, MA, Newbury House, pp. 54–75Google Scholar
  8. Cairns H.S. (1996). The acquisition of language (2nd ed). Texas, Pro-Ed PublishersGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiansen K. M. H. (1995). ‘Ka looking for du?’ A study of language differentiation and the effect of context on language mixing. Ph.D Thesis, University of Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  10. De Houwer A. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge U.K., Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Deprez V., Pierce A. (1993). Negation and functional projections in early grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1): 25–67Google Scholar
  12. Deprez V., Pierce A. (1994). Crosslinguistic evidence for functional projections in early child grammar. In: Hoekstra T., Schwartz B. (eds), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Philadelphia, Benjamins, pp. 57–83Google Scholar
  13. Deuchar M., Quay S. (2000). Bilingual acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Dopke S. (1992). A bilingual child’s struggle to comply with the ‘one parent-one language rule’. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 13(6): 467–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dopke S. (eds). (2000). Cross-linguistic structures in simultaneous bilingualism. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Genesee F.(1989). Early bilingual development: One language or two?. Journal of Child Language 16: 161–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Genesee F., Nicoladis E., Paradis J.(1995). Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language 22: 611–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghomeshi J.(1997). Non-projecting nouns and the Ezafe construction in Persian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 729–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghomeshi J.(2003). Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 57(2): 47–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodz N.(1989). Parental language mixing in bilingual families. Infant Mental Health Journal 10(1): 25–44Google Scholar
  21. Goodz N.(1994). Interaction between parents and children in bilingual families. In: Genesee F. (eds), Educating second language children: The whole child, the whole curriculum, the whole community. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–82Google Scholar
  22. Guilfoyle E., Noonan M. (1992). Functional categories in language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 241–72Google Scholar
  23. Henzelin M.O. (2003). The acquisition of subjects in bilingual children. In: Muller N.(eds), In vulnerable domains in multilingualism. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 107–138Google Scholar
  24. Hyams N.(1992). Morphosyntactic development in Italian and its relevance to parameter- setting models: Comments on the paper by Pizzuto and Caselli. Journal of Child Language 19: 695–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyams N.(1994). V2, null argument and COMP Projections. In: Hoekstra T., Schwartz B. D. (eds), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 21–55Google Scholar
  26. Kaiser G. (1994). More about INFL-ection and agreement: The acquisition of clitic pronouns in French. In: Meisel J. (eds), Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development. Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 131–160Google Scholar
  27. Karimi S.(1996). Case and specificity: Persian ra revisited. Linguistic Analysis 3–4: 173–94Google Scholar
  28. Karimi S.(2003). On object positions, specificity, and scrambling in Persian. In: Karimi S. (eds), Word order and scrambling. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 91–124Google Scholar
  29. Klausen T., Subritzky M.S., Hayashi M. (1993). Initialproduction of inflections in Bilingual children. In: Messer D. J., Turner G. J. (eds), Critical influences on child language acquisition and development. New York, St. Martin’s Press, pp. 65–92Google Scholar
  30. Lanza E. (1993). Language mixing and language dominance in bilingual first language acquisition. In E .V. Clark (Eds.). The proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual child language research forum (pp.197–208). Stanford University: Center for the Study and Information Conference Series.Google Scholar
  31. Lanza E.(1997). Language mixing in infant bilingualism: A sociolinguistic perspective. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Lazard G.(1992). A grammar of contemporary Persian. Costa Meca, CA, Mazda PublishersGoogle Scholar
  33. Lebeaux D.S. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of grammar Ph.D Dissertation, University of MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  34. Leopold W. (1970, c. 1939–1949). Speech development of a bilingual child: A linguistic record. Four volumes New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lindholm K., Padilla A. (1978). Language mixing in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 5: 327–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacWhinney B. (1991). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Jew Jersey, Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, IncGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahootian S. (1997). Persian. New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Meisel J. (1986). Word order and case marking in early child language. Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German. Linguistics 24: 123–83Google Scholar
  39. Meisel J. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In: Hyltenstam K., Obler L. (eds), Bilingualism across the lifespan. Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss. Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–40Google Scholar
  40. Meisel J. (1990) 7. Grammatical development in the simultaneous acquisition of two first languages. In: Meisel J. (ed), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 5–22Google Scholar
  41. Meisel J. (1994a). Code-switching in young bilingual children: The acquisition of grammatical constraints. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 413–44Google Scholar
  42. Meisel J. (1994b). Getting FAT: Finiteness, agreement and tense in early grammars. In: Meisel J. (eds), Bilingual first language acquisition: French and Germangrammatical development. Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 89–130Google Scholar
  43. Meisel J., Muller N. (1992). Finiteness and verb placement inearly child grammars. Evidence from the simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German. In: Meisel J. (eds), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 109–138Google Scholar
  44. Muller N. (1998). Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(3): 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nicoladis E. (1994). Code-switching in young bilingual children Ph.D Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  46. Padilla A.M. & Liebman E. (1975). Language acquisition in the bilingual child. Bilingual Review, 2, pp. 34–55Google Scholar
  47. Paradis J., Genesee M. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or independent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 1–25Google Scholar
  48. Parodi T. (1990). The acquisition of word order regularities and case morphology. In: Meisel J. (eds), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 157–92Google Scholar
  49. Petersen J. (1988). Word-internal code-switching constraints in a bilingual child’s grammar. Linguistics 26: 479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Petersen J. (1997). On the continuity and emergence of functional categories in bilingual first language acquisition. Language Acquisition 6(2): 91–124Google Scholar
  51. Pierce A.E. (1992). Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative study of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  52. Pinker S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Platzack C. (1990). A grammar without functional categories: A syntactic study of early Swedish child language Working papers in Scandinavian syntax, Lund, University of Lund, Vol. 45, pp. 13–34 Lund.Google Scholar
  54. Poeppel D., Wexler K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure. Language 69: 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Quey S. (1992). Expanding language choice in early infant bilingualism Paper presented at the 9th sociolinguistic symposium, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
  56. Radford A. (1988). Small children’s small clauses. Transactions of the philological society 86: 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Radford A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  58. Radford A. (1996). Toward a structure-building model of acquisition. In: Clahsen H. (eds), Generative perspectives on language acquisition. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 43–90Google Scholar
  59. Radford A. (1997). Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  60. Rashtchi M. (1999). Grammatical development in Farsi as the first language: A case study. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(1): 102–138Google Scholar
  61. Redlinger W., Park T.Z. (1980). Language mixing in young bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 7: 337–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Saunders G. (1988). Bilingual children: From birth to teens. Clevedon, Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
  63. Samiian V. (1983). Structure of phrasal categories in Persian, an X-bar analysis Ph.D Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  64. Serratrice L. (2001). The emergence of verbal morphology and the lead-lag pattern issue in bilingual acquisition. In: Cenoz J., Genesee F. (eds), Trends in bilingual acquisition. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 43–70Google Scholar
  65. Schlyter S. (1990). Introducing the DUFDE Project. In: Meisel J. M. (eds), Two first languages: Early grammatical development in bilingual children. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 73–84Google Scholar
  66. Schlyter S. (1993). The weaker language in bilingual Swedish–French children. In: Hyltenstan K., Viberg V. (eds), Progression and regression in language. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  67. Taeschner T. (1983). The sun is feminine: A study on language acquisition of bilingual children. Berlin Heidelberg New York, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  68. Thackston W. J., Jr. (1983). An introduction to Persian. Cambridge, MA: Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  69. Vainikka A. (1994). Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition 3: 257–325Google Scholar
  70. Vihman M.M. (1982). The acquisition of morphology by a bilingual child, a whole-word approach. Applied Psycholinguistics 3: 141–60Google Scholar
  71. Vihman M.M. (1985). Language differentiation by the bilingual infant. Journal of Child Language 12: 297–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Volterra V., Taeschner T. (1978). The acquisition and development of language by bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 5: 311–26Google Scholar
  73. Wakefield J., & Wilcox M.J. (1994). Brain maturation and language acquisition: A theoretical model and preliminary investigation. In D. MacLaughlin, & McEwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the nineteenth annual Boston university conference on language development (pp. 643–654). Someville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  74. Windfuhr G.L. (1979). Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague, Mouton PublishersGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilson S. (2003). Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language 30: 75–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yarmohammadi L. (1997). A contrastive analysis of English and Persian. Tehran, Payame- Noor University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign LanguagesTarbait Moallem UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations