Abstract
This work is a systematic, cross-linguistic examination of speech errors in English, Hindi, Japanese, Spanish and Turkish. It first describes a methodology for the generation of parallel corpora of error data, then uses these data to examine three general hypotheses about the relationship between language structure and the speech production system. All of the following hypotheses were supported by the data. Languages are equally complex. No overall differences were found in the numbers of errors made by speakers of the five languages in the study. Languages are processed in similar ways. English-based generalizations about language production were tested to see to what extent they would hold true across languages. It was found that, to a large degree, languages follow similar patterns. However, the relative numbers of phonological anticipations and perseverations in other languages did not follow the English pattern. Languages differ in that speech errors tend to cluster around loci of complexity within each language. Languages such as Turkish and Spanish, which have more inflectional morphology, exhibit more errors involving inflected forms, while languages such as Japanese, with rich systems of closed-class forms, tend to have more errors involving closed-class items.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alegre M., Gordon P. (1999). Frequency effects and the Representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1): 41–61
Baars B.J. (1980). The competing plans hypothesis: An heuristic viewpoint on the causes of errors in speech. In: Dechert H.W., Raupach M., (eds), Temporal variables in speech. New York, Mouton
Baars B.J. (eds) (1992). Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition. New York, Plenum Press
Berg T. (1987). A cross-linguistic comparison of slips of the tongue. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club
Butt J., Benjamin C. (1988). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London, Hodder & Stoughton
Caplan D. (1992). Language: Structure, processing and disorders. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Clark H.H., Clark E.V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc
Comrie B. (1992). Before complexity. In: Hawkins J.A., Gell-Mann M. (eds), The evolution of human languages. Redwood City, CA, Addison-Wesley, pp. 193–211
Dalbor J.B. (1980). Spanish pronunciation: Theory and practice. New York, Holt Rinehart and Winston Inc
De Mello G. (1990). Español Contemporaneo Lanham, Maryland, University Press of America Inc.
Del Viso P.S. (1992). Errores espontaneos del habla y produccion. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Dell G.S. (1984). Representation of serial order in speech: Evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition 10(2): 222–233
Dell G.S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychological Review 93, 283–321
Dell G.S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5, 313–349
Dell G.S., Burger L.K., Svec W.R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104, 123–147
Donegan P.J., & David S. (1979). The study of Natural Phonology. w: D. Daniel (Ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory (pp. 126–173). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fleck M. (2004). Childes List. http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0402c&L=info-childes&D=1&O=A&P=2747
Fromkin V.A. (eds) (1973), Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Netherlands, Mouton and Company
Fromkin V.A. (eds) (1980), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York, Academic Press
Garrett M.F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In: Bower G., (eds), Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 9. New York, Academic Press, pp. 137–177
Garrett M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In: Butterworth B. (eds), Language production, Vol 1. Speech and talk. London, Academic Press
Garrett M.F. (1984). The organization of processing structure for language production: Applications to aphasic speech. In: Caplan D. et al. (eds), Biological perspectives on language. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, pp. 172–193
Garrett M.F. (1988). Processes in language production. In: Newmeyer F., (eds), Linguistics: The cambridge survey III. language: psychological and biological aspects. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–96
Groza V., Ileana D., Irwin I. (1999). A peacock or a crow: stories, interview, and commentaries on Romanian adoptions. Euclid, OH, Williams Custom Publishing Div
Harley T.A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science 9, 191–219
Hotopf W.H.N. (1980). Semantic similarity as a factor in whole-word slips of the tongue. In V.A. Fromkin (1980) (Ed.), Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the tongue,ear, pen and hand, pp. 97–109 New York: Academic Press.
Hymes D. (1964). Introduction to part 2 of language in culture and society. New York, Harper and Row
Jaeger J. (1992). Not by the chair of my hinny-hin-hin: Some general properties of slips of the tongue in young children. Journal of Child Language 19, 335–366
Jaeger J. (1997). The development of syllable structure: Evidence from slips of the tongue (Manuscript. To appear in Festschrift for Derwing B.).
Jaeger J. (2004). Kids’ slips: what young children’s slips of the tongue reveal about language development. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Kachru Y. (1966). An introduction to Hindi syntax. Urbana, University of Illinois
Kawachi K. (2002). Practice effects on speech production planning: Evidence in spontaneous versus preplanned speech in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31(4): 363–390
Kellerman E. (1977). Towards a characterisation of the strategies of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 2, 58–145
Kubozono H. (1985). Speech errors and syllable structure. Linguistics and Philology 6, 220–243
Levy Y. (2004). Childes List. http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0402c&L=info-childes&D=1&O=A&P=666 and http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0402c&L=info-childes&D=1&O=A&P=491
Levelt W. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 14, 41–104
Levelt W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MIT Press
Light L.L. (1993). Language Changes in Old Age. In G. Blanken J. Dittmann H. Grimm J.C. Marshall, & C.-W. Wallesch, (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies: an international handbook (pp. 900–918). Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Liskin-Gasparro J. (1982). Oral Proficiency Testing Manual. Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service
MacKay D. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluencey and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review 89, 483–506
MacKay D.G., Abrams L. (1996). Language, memory and aging: Distributed deficits and the structure of new versus old connections. In: Birren J.E., Schaie W.K. (eds), Handbook of the psychology of aging: 4th edn. San Diego, Academic Press
MacWhinney B. (2004). Childes List. http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0402c&L=info-childes&D=1&O=A&P=757R
Maddieson I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Mahoney P.G. (1997). Language Production, Speech Errors, and Aging. Dissertation Abstracts International, B: Sciences and Engineering 58(4): 2148-B
McCawley J.D. (1968). The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague, Mouton
McGregor R.S. (1995). Outline of Hindi grammar. Oxford University Press, New York
Miyakoda H. (2003). The theory of phonology as human behavior: A focus on Japanese speech errors. Sophia Linguistica 50, 197–209
Motley M. (1976). Laboratory induction of verbal slips: A new method for psycholinguistic research. Communication Quarterly 24, 28–34
Motley M. (1980). Verification of “Freudian Slips” and semantic prearticulatory editing via laboratory-induced Spoonerisms. In V.A. Fromkin (1980) (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: slipps of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 133–148). NY: Academic press.
Navon D., Gopher D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychology Review 86, 214–255
Niedzielski N., Preston D. (2000). Folk Linguistics. Berlin, Germany, Mouton de Gruyter
Nooteboom S.G. (1973). The tongue slips into patterns (Reprinted in Fromkin (1973). Spoesch errors as linguistic evidence. The Netherlands: Mouton and Company).
Odlin T. (1992). Transferability and linguistic substrates. Second Language Research 8(3): 171–202
Ohala M., Ohala J.J. (1988). Scarcity of speech errors in Hindi. In: Hyman L.M., Li C.N. (eds), Language, speech and mind: studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin. Knet, Routledge, pp. 239–253
Pisoni D.B. (1981). Some current theoretical issues in speech perception. Cognition 10, 249–259
Pullum G. (1991). The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax, and other irreverent essays on the study of language. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Playhouse Video. (1989). Dr. Seuss: The cat in the hat. New York, Playhouse Video
Ruhlen M. (1975). A guide to the languages of the world. Stanford, Stanford University Language Universals Project
Schwartz M.F., Saffran E.M., Bloch D.E., Dell G.S. (1994). Disordered speech production in aphasic and normal speakers. Brain and Language 47, 52–88
Schweizer K. (1996). The speed/accuracy transition due to task complexity. Intelligence 22(2): 115
Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Klatt D. (1979). The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 41–55
Slobin D (eds) (1985). The Crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, L. Erlbaum Associates
Snell R., Weightman S. (1989). Hindi. London, Hodder Headline PLC
Stemberger J.P. (1983). Speech errors and theoretical phonology: A review. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club
Stemberger J.P. (1985). The reliability and replicability of naturalistic speech error data: A comparison with experimentally induced errors. In Research on speech perception Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Stemberger J.P. (2004). Childes List. http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0402c&L=info-childes&D=1&O=A&P=1774
Stemberger J.P., MacWhinney B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition 14, 17–26
Stinen E.A. (1990). On-line processing of written text by younger and older children. Psychology and Aging 5, 68–78
Swift L.B. (1963). A reference grammar of modern Turkish. Bloomington, Indiana University publications
Thomas L.V. (1967). Elementary Turkish. New York, Dover Publications Inc
Tsujimura N. (1996). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Cambridge, Blackwell Publishers
Tobin Y. (1997). Phonology as human behavior: Theoretical implications and clinical implications. Durham (NC), Duke University Press
Van den Broecke M.P.R., Goldstein L. (1980). Consonant features in speech errors. In V.A. Fromkin (1980) (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slipps of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 47–65). New York: Academic Press.
Van Valin R.D. Jr., LaPolla R.J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Vance T. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany, State University of New York Press
Wan I. (1999). Mandarin phonology: Evidence from speech errors. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Wells S. (1995). A speech error investigation of the impact of orthography on Japanese speech production. (Papers from the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society) (pp. 478–489). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wells-Jensen, S. A Cross-Linguistic Speech Error Investigation of Functional Complexity. J Psycholinguist Res 36, 107–157 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9036-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9036-5