A Culturally Sensitive Approach to Large-Scale Prevention Studies: A Case Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial With Low-Income Latino Communities
In response to U.S. federal mandates to increase the presence of underrepresented populations in prevention research, investigators have increasingly focused on using culturally sensitive research practices. However, scholars have rarely discussed these practices in terms of a larger culturally sensitive framework. Further, while the literature has explored how culturally sensitive approaches can be employed in a variety of methods, there has been little examination of how to incorporate such approaches into experimental designs. In this paper, we explain how we incorporated a culturally sensitive framework in a cluster randomized field trial with over 3000 predominantly low-income Latino families, utilizing an intervention designed to improve social relations and enhance family functioning. We offer conceptual and practical examples to guide other researchers who want to adopt a similar approach in their research designs. In addition, we discuss the benefits of forging local partnerships throughout the research process to ensure respect for racial and ethnic minorities participating in social and behavioral experimental studies. We conclude with practical considerations for utilizing a culturally sensitive framework to advance prevention programs, policies, and practices among underrepresented groups in order to achieve the ultimate goal of addressing the traditional underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in research.
KeywordsLatinos Prevention research Culturally-sensitive research Randomized controlled trials FAST
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD051762-01A2], the Institute of Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education [R305B090009], and the Ford Foundation. Many thanks to Drs. Adam Gamoran, Ruth N. López Turley, Monique Mills, and Sandy Magaña who read previous versions of the manuscript. The contents herein are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the supporting agencies. Authors’ names are in alphabetical order, with both contributing equally to the article.
Compliance With Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
- Constantine, M. G., & Sue, D. W. (2005). The American Psychological Association’s guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, organizational psychology: Initial development and summary. In M. G. Constantine & D. W. Sue (Eds.), Strategies for building multicultural competence in mental health and educational settings. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dillman Carpentier, F. R., Mauricio, A. M., Gonzales, N. A., Millsap, R. E., Meza, C. M., Dumka, L. E., et al. (2007). Engaging Mexican origin families in a school-based preventive intervention. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 28(6), 521–546. doi: 10.1007/s10935-007-0110-z.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gamoran, A., Turley, R. N. L., Turner, A., & Fish, R. (2012). Differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic families in social capital and child development: First-year findings from an experimental study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(1), 97–112. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2011.08.001.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guerra, N. G., & Knox, L. (2008). How culture impacts the dissemination and implementation of innovation: A case study of the Families and Schools Together program (FAST) for preventing violence with immigrant Latino youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 304–313. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9161-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A., & Parker, E. A. (Eds.). (2005). Introduction to methods for CPBR for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Kingston, B., Bacallao, M., Smokowski, P., Sullivan, T., & Sutherland, K. (2016). Constructing “packages” of evidence-based programs to prevent youth violence: Processes and illustrative examples from the CDC’s youth violence prevention centers. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(2), 141–163. doi: 10.1007/s10935-016-0423-x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kratochwill, T. R., McDonald, L., Levin, J. R., Young Bear-Tibbetts, H., & Demaray, M. K. (2004). Families and schools together: An experimental analysis of a parent-mediated multi-family group program for American Indian children. Journal of School Psychology, 42(5), 359–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2004.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lareau, A. (2009). Narrow questions, narrow answers: The limited value of randomized controlled trials for education research. In P. B. Walters, A. Lareau, & S. H. Ranis (Eds.), Education research on trial: Policy reform and the call for scientific rigor. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lauricella, M., Valdez, J. K., Okamoto, S. K., Helm, S., & Zaremba, C. (2016). Culturally grounded prevention for minority youth populations: A systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(1), 11–32. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0414-3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto, S. K., Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Holleran Steiker, L. K., & Dustman, P. (2014). A continuum of approaches toward developing culturally focused prevention interventions: From adaptation to grounding. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 35(2), 103–112. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0334-z.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Padilla, A. M. (2004). Quantitative methods in multicultural education research. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Quinn, S. C., Butler, J., Fryer, C. S., Garza, M. A., Kim, K. H., Ryan, C., et al. (2012). Attributes of researchers and their strategies to recruit minority populations: Results of a national survey. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 33(6), 1231–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.011.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Resnicow, K., Soler, R., Braithwaite, R. L., Asluwalia, J. S., & Butler, J. (2000). Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 271–290. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200005)28:3<271:AID-JCOP4>3.0.CO;2-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valdez, C. R., Mills, M. T., Bohlig, A. J., & Kaplan, D. (2013b). The role of parental language acculturation in the formation of social capital: Differential effects on high-risk children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 44(2), 334–350. doi: 10.1007/s10578-012-0328-8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valenzuela, A. (2010). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (pro) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar