Advertisement

The Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 315–328 | Cite as

Marijuana and the Risk of Fatal Car Crashes: What Can We Learn from FARS and NRS Data?

  • Eduardo Romano
  • Pedro Torres-Saavedra
  • Robert B. Voas
  • John H. Lacey
Original Paper

Abstract

Lab studies have shown that marijuana can severely impair driving skills. Epidemiological studies, however, have been inconclusive regarding the contribution of marijuana use to crash risk. In the United States, case–control studies based on the merging of comparable crash Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and non-crash National Roadside Survey (NRS) data have been applied to assess the contribution of drugs to crash risk, but these studies have yielded confusing, even contradictory results. We hypothesize that such a divergence of results emanates from limitations in the databases used in these studies, in particular that of the FARS. The goal of this effort is to examine this hypothesis, and in doing so, illuminate the pros and cons of using these databases for drugged-driving research efforts. We took advantage of two relatively recent cannabis crash risk studies that, despite using similar databases (the FARS and the NRS) and following similar overall approaches, yielded opposite results (Li, Brady, & Chen, 2013; Romano, Torres-Saavedra, Voas, & Lacey, 2014). By identifying methodological similarities and differences between these efforts, we assessed how the limitations of the FARS and NRS databases contributed to contradictory and biased results. Because of its limitations, we suggest that the FARS database should neither be used to examine trends in drug use nor to obtain precise risk estimates. However, under certain conditions (e.g., based on data from jurisdictions that routinely test for drugs, with as little variation in testing procedures as possible), the FARS database could be used to assess the contribution of drugs to fatal crash risk relative to other sources of risk such as alcohol.

Keywords

Cannabis Alcohol Crash risk FARS NRS 

Notes

Compliance With Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights Statements

This article performs secondary analyses on data containing no personal identifiers. This article does not include any studies with human participants or animals conducted by any of the authors.

References

  1. Asbridge, M., Hayden, J. A., & Cartwright, J. L. (2012). Acute cannabis consumption and motor vehicle collision risk: Systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 344, e536. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e536.bmj.e536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Berning, A., & Smither, D. D. (2014). Understanding the limitations of drug test information, reporting, and testing practices in fatal crashes. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Blomberg, R. D., Peck, R. C., Moskowitz, H., Burns, M., & Fiorentino, D. (2005). Crash risk of alcohol involved driving: A case-control study. Stamford, CT: Dunlap & Associates, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.dunlapandassociatesinc.com/crashriskofalcoholinvolveddriving.pdf.
  4. Elvik, R. (2013). Risk of road accident associated with the use of drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from epidemiological studies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 60, 254–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fell, J. C. (1983). Tracking the alcohol improvement problem in U.S. highway crashes. In 27th Annual proceedings of the american association for automotive medicine, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  6. Gadegbeku, B., Amoros, E., & the SAM Group. (2010). Responsibility study: Main illicit psychoactive substances among car drivers involved in fatal road crashes in FranceDRUID (Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines) Deliverable 2.3.2. Bergisch-Gladbach: Federal Highway Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.druid-project.eu/cln_031/nn_107548/Druid/EN/deliverales-list/downloads/Deliverable__2__3__2,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/Deliverable_2_3_2.pdf.
  7. Gjerde, H., & Mørland, J. (2016). Risk for involvement in road traffic crash during acute cannabis intoxication. Addiction, 111(8), 1492–1495. doi: 10.1111/add.13435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartman, R., & Huestis, M. (2013). Cannabis effects on driving skills. Clinical Chemistry, 59(3), 478–492.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartman, R. L., Richman, J. E., Hayes, C. E., & Huestis, M. A. (2016). Drug recognition expert (DRE) examination characteristics of cannabis impairment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 92, 219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hingson, R., Winter, M., & Heeren, T. (2010). Alcohol and drug use in fatally injured drivers in states that test over 80% for both alcohol and drugs. In The tri-annual meeting of the international conference on alcohol, drugs and traffic safety, August 22, 2010, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  11. Huestis, M. (2016). Effects of cannabis on human psychomotor performance. Speaker at the Marijuana and Cannabinoids: A Neuroscience Research Summit. Psychomotor Performance and Detection session. NIH Campus, Bethesda, MD. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnUce0c90x0&index=11&list=PLE4ZNGaomJBnFoW82EjtVAtRimC84B3Bm.
  12. Kelley-Baker, T., Moore, C., Lacey, J. H., & Yao, J. (2014). Comparing drug detection in oral fluid and blood: Data from a national sample of nighttime drivers. Traffic Injury Prevention, 15(2), 111–118. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.796042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleinman, M. (2016). A cannabis research agenda for policy design: What do we need to know? Speaker at the Marijuana and Cannabinoids: A Neuroscience Research Summit. Policy Research: Challenges and Future Directions session. NIH Campus, Bethesda, MD. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnUce0c90x0&index=11&list=PLE4ZNGaomJBnFoW82EjtVAtRimC84B3Bm.
  14. Kuypers, K. P., Legrand, S. A., Ramaekers, J. G., & Verstraete, A. G. (2012). A case-control study estimating accident risk for alcohol, medicines and illegal drugs. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lacey, J. H., Kelley-Baker, T., Furr-Holden, C. D. M., Voas, R. B., Romano, E., Ramirez, A.,··· Berning, A. (2009). 2007 national roadside survey of alcohol and drug use by drivers: Drug results. (DOT HS 811 249). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.gov/Driving+Safety/Research+&+Evaluation/2007+National+Roadside+Survey+of+Alcohol+and+Drug+Use+by+Drivers.
  16. Li, G., Brady, J., & Chen, Q. (2013). Drug use and fatal motor vehicle crashes: A case-control study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 60, 205–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, M. C., Brady, J. E., DiMaggio, C. J., Lusardi, A. R., Tzong, K. Y., & Li, G. (2012). Marijauana use and motor vehicle crashes. Epidemiologic Reviews, 34, 65–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Moskowitz, H. (1985). Marihuana and driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 17, 323–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pacula, R. L., & Sevigny, E. L. (2014). Marijuana liberalization policies: Why we can’t learn much from policy still in motion. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 212–221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Pollini, R. A., Romano, E., Johnson, M. B., & Lacey, J. H. (2015). The impact of marijuana decriminalization on California drivers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 150, 135–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogeberg, O., & Elvik, R. (2016). The effects of cannabis intoxication on motor vehicle collision revisited and revised. Addiction, 111(8), 1348–1359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Romano, E., & Pollini, R. A. (2013). Patterns of drug use in fatal crashes. Addiction, 108(8), 1428–1438. doi: 10.1111/add.12180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Romano, E., Torres-Saavedra, P., Voas, R. B., & Lacey, J. H. (2014). Drugs and alcohol: Their relative crash risk. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75(1), 56–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Romano, E., & Voas, R. B. (2011). Drug and alcohol involvement in four types of fatal crashes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(4), 567–576.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Rubens, M. (2014). Political and medical views on medical marijuana and its future. Social Work in Public Health, 29(2), 121–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schulze, H., Schumacher, M., Urmeew, R., Alvarez, J., Bernhoft, I. M., de Gier, H. d. G.,··· Pilgerstorfer, M. (2012). Driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol and medicines in Europe—Findings from the DRUID project. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.Google Scholar
  27. Schwope, D. M., Bosker, W. M., Ranaekers, J. G., Gorelick, D. A., & Huestis, M. A. (2012). Psychomotor performance, subjective and physiological effects and whole blood Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations in heavy, chronic cannabis smokers following acute smoked cannabis. Journal of Analytic Toxicology, 36(6), 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sewell, R. A., Poling, J., & Sofuoglu, M. (2009). The effect of cannabis compared with alcohol on driving. American Journal on Addictions, 18(3), 185–193. doi: 10.1080/10550490902786934.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Voas, R. B., Torres, P., Romano, E., & Lacey, J. H. (2012). Alcohol-related risk of driver fatalities: An update using 2007 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(3), 341–350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Zador, P. L., Krawchuk, S. A., & Voas, R. B. (2000). Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: An update using 1996 data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 61(3), 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Romano
    • 1
  • Pedro Torres-Saavedra
    • 2
  • Robert B. Voas
    • 1
  • John H. Lacey
    • 1
  1. 1.Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE)CalvertonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Puerto Rico at MayagüezMayagüezPuerto Rico

Personalised recommendations