Advertisement

The Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 38, Issue 1–2, pp 195–205 | Cite as

Development of a Culturally Informed Child Safety Curriculum for American Indian Families

  • Ryan M. Berns
  • Emily J. Tomayko
  • Kate A. Cronin
  • Ronald J. Prince
  • Tassy Parker
  • Alexandra K. AdamsEmail author
Brief Report

Abstract

American Indian (AI) children are disproportionately affected by unintentional injuries, with injury mortality rates approximately 2.3 times higher than the combined rates for all children in the United States. Although multiple risk factors are known to contribute to these increased rates, a comprehensive, culturally informed curriculum that emphasizes child safety is lacking for this population. In response to this need, academic and tribal researchers, tribal community members, tribal wellness staff, and national child safety experts collaborated to develop a novel child safety curriculum. This paper describes its development and community delivery. We developed the safety curriculum as part of a larger randomized controlled trial known as Healthy Children, Strong Families 2 (HCSF2), a family-based intervention targeting obesity prevention in early childhood (2–5 years). During the development of the HCSF2 intervention, participating tribal communities expressed concern about randomizing enrolled families to a control group who would not receive an intervention. To address this concern and the significant disparities in injuries and unintentional death rates among AI children, we added an active control group (Safety Journey) that would utilize our safety curriculum. Satisfaction surveys administered at the 12-month time point of the intervention indicate 94% of participants (N = 196) were either satisfied or very satisfied with the child safety curriculum. The majority of participants (69%) reported spending more than 15 min with the curriculum materials each month, and 83% thought the child safety newsletters were either helpful or very helpful in making changes to improve their family’s safety. These findings indicate these child safety materials have been well received by HCSF2 participants. The use of community-engaged approaches to develop this curriculum represents a model that could be adapted for other at-risk populations and serves as an initial step toward the creation of a multi-level child safety intervention strategy.

Keywords

Child safety American Indian Unintentional injuries Culturally informed Community-based participatory research (CBPR) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our community partners; Nancy Bill, Injury Prevention Program Manager, Indian Health Service; and the Safe Kids Madison Coalition for their contributions and expert advice in developing the curriculum. We extend special thanks to Alan Tomow, Nathania Tsosie, and the AI families who participated in focus groups at the University of New Mexico to comment on the newsletter development process. We also thank Katie Berns for helping with the survey data analysis. Lastly, we want to thank all tribal wellness staff members, HCSF2 site coordinators, and families participating in the HCSF2 trial for their involvement in, and contribution to, this project.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1 R01 HL114912. Emily Tomayko’s time on this project was supported through NIH 5T32 DK007665 while she was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Wisconsin.

Compliance With Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Adams, A. K., LaRowe, T. L., Cronin, K. A., Prince, R. J., Wubben, D. P., Parker, T., et al. (2012). The healthy children, strong families intervention: Design and community participation. Journal of Primary Prevention, 33(4), 175–185. doi: 10.1007/s10935-012-0275-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Berenstain, S., & Berenstain, J. (1985). The Berenstain bears learn about strangers. New York: Random House Children’s Books.Google Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012). Vital signs: Unintentional injury deaths among persons aged 0–19 years: United States, 2000–2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61, 270–276.Google Scholar
  4. DiGuiseppi, C., & Higgins, J. P. (2000). Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 82(5), 341–348.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans, C. A., Jr., Fielding, J. E., Brownson, R. C., England, M. J., Fullilove, M. T., Guerra, F. A., et al. (2001). Motor-vehicle occupant injury: Strategies for increasing use of child safety seats, increasing use of safety belts, and reducing alcohol-impaired driving. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Recommendations and Reports, 50(Rr-7), 1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Golan, M., Weizman, A., Apter, A., & Fainaru, M. (1998). Parents as the exclusive agents of change in the treatment of childhood obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 67(6), 1130–1135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap): A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jurkowski, J. M., Mills, L. L. G., Lawson, H. A., Bovenzi, M. C., Quartimon, R., & Davison, K. K. (2013). Engaging low-income parents in childhood obesity prevention from start to finish: A case study. Journal of Community Health, 38(1), 1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuklinski, D. M., Berger, L. R., & Weaver, J. R. (1996). Smoke detector nuisance alarms: A field study in a Native American community. National Fire Protection Association Journal, 90, 65–72.Google Scholar
  10. LaRowe, T. L., Wubben, D. P., Cronin, K. A., Vannatter, S. M., & Adams, A. K. (2007). Development of a culturally appropriate, home-based nutrition and physical activity curriculum for Wisconsin American Indian families. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(4), A109.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Letourneau, R. J., Crump, C. E., Bowling, J. M., Kuklinski, D. M., & Allen, C. W. (2008). Ride safe: A child passenger safety program for American Indian/Alaska Native children. Journal of Maternal and Child Health, 12(1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Murphy, T., Pokhrel, P., Worthington, A., Billie, H., Sewell, M., & Bill, N. (2014). Unintentional injury mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States, 1990–2009. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S3), S470–S480.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Piland, N. F., & Berger, L. R. (2007). The economic burden of injuries involving American Indians and Alaska Natives: A critical need for prevention. IHS Primary Care Provider, 32(9), 269–280. https://www.ihs.gov/provider/includes/themes/newihstheme/display_objects/documents/2000_2009/PROV0907.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. Rivara, F. P., Thompson, D. C., Beahler, C., & MacKenzie, E. J. (1999). Systematic reviews of strategies to prevent motor vehicle injuries. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(1), 1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas, P., & Harker, L. (2003). I can be safe: A first look at safety. New York: Barron’s Educational Series.Google Scholar
  16. Tomayko, E. J., Prince, R. J., Cronin, K. A., & Adams, A. K. (2016). The Healthy Children, Strong Families intervention promotes improvements in nutrition, activity and body weight in American Indian families with young children. Public Health Nutrition. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001014.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan M. Berns
    • 1
  • Emily J. Tomayko
    • 3
  • Kate A. Cronin
    • 2
  • Ronald J. Prince
    • 2
  • Tassy Parker
    • 4
  • Alexandra K. Adams
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Medical College of WisconsinGreen BayUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  3. 3.College of Public Health and Human SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of New Mexico School of MedicineAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations