Changes in Self-Efficacy for Exercise and Improved Nutrition Fostered by Increased Self-Regulation Among Adults With Obesity
- 1.3k Downloads
Behavioral theory suggests that treatments that increase participants’ use of self-regulatory skills and/or their feelings of ability (self-efficacy) will improve exercise and nutrition behaviors. In addition, psychosocial factors associated with increased exercise may carry over to improved eating. Self-regulation might enhance self-efficacy through feelings of ability to manage barriers to maintaining weight-loss behaviors. Sedentary adults with severe or morbid obesity (M age = 43 years; M BMI = 40.1 kg/m2) participated in a 6-month study within a community-based YMCA center. We randomly assigned participants to one of the two groups that incorporated the same cognitive-behavioral support of exercise paired with methods for controlled, healthy eating emphasizing either (a) self-efficacy (n = 138), or (b) self-regulation (n = 136) methods. Mixed model repeated measures ANOVAs indicated significant improvements in exercise- and eating-related self-regulation over 3 months, and exercise- and eating-related self-efficacy over 6 months. The Self-Regulation Treatment Group demonstrated greater improvements in self-regulation for eating and fruit and vegetable intake than the Self-Efficacy Group. Regression analyses indicated that for both exercise and eating, self-regulation change significantly predicted self-efficacy change. In separate equations, changes in exercise and fruit and vegetable intake mediated those relationships, and change in self-efficacy and the corresponding behavioral changes demonstrated reciprocal, mutually reinforcing, relationships. There was evidence of carry-over, or generalization, of both self-regulation and self-efficacy changes from an exercise context to an eating context. We discussed findings in terms of leveraging self-regulation to improve self-efficacy, and provide a rationale for why exercise is the strongest predictor of success with weight loss. Results may be used to inform future behavioral weight-management treatments through improved knowledge of relationships among theoretically derived psychosocial factors.
KeywordsObesity Self-regulation Self-efficacy Exercise Nutrition Treatment
Compliance With Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Appropriate institutional review board approval was received.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- American College of Sports Medicine. (2009). Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42, 459–471.Google Scholar
- Anderson, E. S., Winett, R. A., Wojcik, J. R., & Williams, D. M. (2010). Social cognitive mediators of change in a group randomized nutrition and physical activity intervention: Social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-regulation in the guide-to-health trial. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 21–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Annesi, J. J., Unruh, J. L., Marti, C. N., Gorjala, S., & Tennant, G. (2011). Effects of The Coach Approach intervention on adherence to exercise in obese women: Assessing mediation of social cognitive theory factors. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 99–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker, C. W., & Brownell, K. D. (2000). Physical activity and maintenance of weight loss: Physiological and psychological mechanisms. In C. Bouchard (Ed.), Physical activity and obesity (pp. 311–328). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Garber, C. E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M. R., Franklin, B. A., Lamonte, M. J., et al. (2011). Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 43, 1334–1359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Godin, G. (2011). The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Health & Fitness Journal of Canada, 4(1), 18–22.Google Scholar
- Godin, G., & Shephard, R. J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 10, 141–146.Google Scholar
- Green, L. W., Sim, L., & Breiner, H. (Eds.). (2013). Evaluating obesity prevention efforts: A plan for measuring progress. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.Google Scholar
- Mata, J., Silva, M. N., Vieira, P. N., Carraça, E. V., Andrade, A. M., Coutinhom, S. R., et al. (2009). Motivational “spill-over” during weight control: Increased self-determination and exercise intrinsic motivation predict eating self-regulation. Health Psychology, 28, 709–716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morgan, W. P. (1997). Methodological considerations. In W. P. Morgan (Ed.), Physical activity and mental health (pp. 3–32). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Olander, E. K., Fletcher, H., Williams, S., Atkinson, L., Turner, A., & French, D. P. (2013). What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals’ physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, 29.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palmeira, A. L., Markland, D. A., Silva, M. N., Branco, T. L., Martins, S. C., Minderico, C. S., et al. (2009). Reciprocal effects among changes in weight, body image, and other psychological factors during behavioral obesity treatment: A mediation analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6, 9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roe, R. A. (2012). What is wrong with mediators and moderators? European Health Psychologist, 14(1), 4–10.Google Scholar
- Sharma, S., Murphy, S. P., Wilkens, L. R., Shen, L., Hankin, J. H., Monroe, K. R., et al. (2004). Adherence to the Food Guide Pyramid recommendations among African American and Latinos: Results from the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104, 1873–1877.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shaw, K. A., O’Rourke, P., Del Mar, C., & Kenardy, J. (2009). Psychological interventions for overweight or obesity (Review). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2014). MyPlate and historical Food Pyramid resources. Retrieved from http://fnic.nal.usda.gov/dietary-guidance/myplate-and-historical-food-pyramid-resources. Accessed June 2, 2014.