Advertisement

The Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 67–81 | Cite as

Child and Parental Outcomes Following Involvement in a Preventive Intervention: Efficacy of the PACE Program

  • Angela Moreland BegleEmail author
  • Jean E. Dumas
Original Paper

Abstract

This study evaluated whether engagement (i.e., attendance and quality of participation) in the Parenting our Children to Excellence (PACE) program predicted positive child and parent outcomes. PACE in an 8-week preventive intervention aimed at parents of preschool children. The study investigated the relation of engagement to outcomes in an ethnically diverse sample of 610 parents and among a subset of those parents at high risk for child maltreatment. Overall results demonstrated that engagement in PACE significantly improved child and parent outcomes at post-assessment and/or one-year follow-up assessment. Results for the high-risk subsample were even stronger as engagement significantly improved almost all of the child and parent outcomes at post-assessment, which continued to significantly improve in the year following program completion. Findings provide support for the efficacy of PACE in improving child and parent outcomes in an ethnically diverse community population and among parents considered at risk for child maltreatment.

Keywords

Parenting Prevention Hierarchical linear modeling Program evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study would not have been possible without the collaboration of Marsha Hearn-Lindsey, Director, Child Care Answers, Indianapolis, of all the parents and children who participated in various aspects of the research, and of staff members who played major roles in data collection and program implementation, including Amanda Mosby, Sharon Hampton, and Stephanie Wynder. Their help and encouragement are gratefully acknowledged. This study was supported by grant R49/CCR 522339 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the second author. The support and encouragement of Linda Anne Valle, Ph.D., and Michele Hoover is gratefully acknowledged. The study’s findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr. Begle is supported by T32 MH18869-15.

References

  1. Abidin, R. (1983). Parenting stress index: Manual, administration booklet, and research update. Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abidin, R. (1990). Parenting stress index. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  3. Abidin, R. R. (1997). Parenting stress index: A measure of the parent–child system. In C. P. Zalaquett & R. J. Wood (Eds.), Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 277–291). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  4. August, G. J., Realmuto, G. M., Hektner, J. M., & Bloomquist, M. L. (2001). An integrated components preventive intervention for aggressive elementary school children: The Early Risers program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(4), 614–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkley, R. A., Shelton, T. L., Crosswait, C., Moorehouse, M., Fletcher, K., Barrett, S., et al. (2000). Multi-method psycho-educational intervention for preschool children with disruptive behavior: Preliminary results at post-treatment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(3), 319–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begle, A. M., Dumas, J. E., & Hanson, R. (2010). Predicting child abuse potential: An empirical investigation of two theoretical frameworks. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39(2), 208–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boggs, S., Eyberg, S., & Reynolds, L. (1990). Concurrent validity of the ECBI. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19(1), 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley, S. J., Jadaa, D., Brody, J., Landy, S., Tallett, S. E., Watson, W., et al. (2003). Brief psychoeducational parenting program: An evaluation and 1-year follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(1), 1171–1178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brestan, E. V., & Eyberg, S. M. (1998). Effective psychosocial treatments of conduct-disordered children and adolescents: 29 years, 82 studies, and 5,272 kids. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27(2), 180–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaffin, M., Silovsky, J. F., Funderbunk, B., Valle, L. A., Brestan, E. V., Balachova, T., et al. (2004). Parent–child interaction therapy with physically abusive parents: Efficacy for reducing future abuse reports. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 500–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2002). The implementation of the fast track program: An example of a large-scale prevention science efficacy trial. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulton, C., Crampton, D., Irwin, M., Spilsbury, J., & Korbin, J. (2007). How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternative pathways. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(11–12), 1117–1142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 719–788). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Dumas, J. E., Begle, A. M., French, B. F., & Pearl, A. M. (2010). Effects of monetary incentives on engagement in the PACE parenting program. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39(3), 302–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dumas, J. E., Lynch, A. M., Laughlin, J. E., Smith, E. P., & Prinz, R. J. (2001). Promoting intervention fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(1), 38–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dumas, J. E., Moreland, A. D., Gitter, A., Pearl, A., & Nordstrom, A. (2006). Engaging parents in preventive parenting groups: Do ethnic, socioeconomic, attitude, and value match between parents and group leaders matter? Health Education and Behavior, 33, 715–724.Google Scholar
  19. Dumas, J. E., Nissley-Tsiopinis, J., & Moreland, A. D. (2007). From intent to enrollment, attendance, and participation in preventive parenting groups. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dumas, J. E., Prinz, R. J., Smith, E. P., & Laughlin, J. (1999). The EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial: An integrated set of interventions to promote competence and reduce risk for conduct disorder, substance abuse, and school failure. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2(1), 37–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Gershater-Molko, R. M., Lutzker, J. R., & Wesch, D. (2003). Project SafeCare: Improved health, safety, and parenting skills in families for, and at risk for child maltreatment. Journal of Family Violence, 18(5), 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heinrichs, N. (2006). The effects of two different incentives on recruitment rates of families into a prevention program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(4), 345–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hess, B. (2000). Assessing program impact using latent growth modeling: A primer for the evaluator. Evaluation and program planning, 23(2), 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnston, C., & Mash, E. J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18(2), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, K., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., & Eames, C. (2008). Efficacy of the Incredible Years programme as an early intervention for children with conduct problems and ADHD: Long-term follow-up. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34(3), 380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., Filene, J. H., & Boyle, C. L. (2008). A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(4), 567–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Parent management training. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Levac, M. A., McCay, E., Merka, P., & Reddon-D’Arcy, M. L. (2008). Exploring parent participation in a parent training program for children’s aggression: Understanding and illuminating mechanisms of change. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 21(2), 78–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lochman, J. E. (2000). Parent and family skills training in targeted prevention programs for at-risk youth. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21(2), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundhal, B., Risser, H. J., & Lovejoy, C. (2006). A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling with repeated measures data. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561–614). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  33. Milner, J. (1986). The child abuse potential inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). Webster, NC: Psytec.Google Scholar
  34. Milner, J. (1994). Assessing physical child abuse risk: The child abuse potential inventory. Clinical Psychology Review, 14(6), 547–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moreland, A., & Dumas, J. (2007). Evaluating child coping competence: Theory and measurement. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17(3), 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ohan, J. L., Leung, D. W., & Johnston, C. (2000). The Parenting sense of competence scale: Evidence of a stable factor structure and validity. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 32(4), 251–261.Google Scholar
  37. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  38. Ricketts, H., & Anderson, P. (2008). The impact of poverty and stress on the interaction of Jamaican caregivers with young children. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanders, M. R. (2008). Triple P-positive parenting program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 506–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., Tully, L. A., & Bor, W. (2000). The triple P-positive parenting program: A comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 624–640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Segal, D., Chen, P. Y., Gordon, D. A., Kacir, C. D., & Gylys, J. (2003). Development and evaluation of a parenting intervention program: Integration of scientific and practical approaches. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15(3), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Serketich, W. J., & Dumas, J. E. (1996). The effectiveness of behavioral parent training to modify antisocial behavior in children: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy, 27(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2000). Research on family engagement in preventive interventions: Toward improved use of scientific findings in primary prevention practice. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 21(2), 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2000). Modeling factors influencing enrollment in family focused preventive intervention research. Prevention Science, 1(4), 213–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Way, I., Chung, S., Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2001). Maltreatment perpetrators: A 54-month analysis of recidivism. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(8), 1093–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2001). Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(3), 283–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2004). Treating children with early onset conduct problems: Intervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(1), 105–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Nipping early risk factors in the bud: Preventing substance abuse, delinquency, and violence in adolescence through interventions targeted at young children (0–8 years). Prevention Science, 2(2), 165–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zubrich, S. R., Northey, K., Silburn, S. R., Williams, A. W., Blair, E., Robertson, D., et al. (2005). Prevention of child behavior problems via universal implementation of a group behavioral family intervention. Prevention Science, 6(4), 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Crime Victims Treatment and Research CenterMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations