Advertisement

Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 497–513 | Cite as

Online Mentoring: The Promise and Challenges of an Emerging Approach to Youth Development

  • Jean E. RhodesEmail author
  • Renée Spencer
  • Rebecca N. Saito
  • Cynthia L. Sipe
Article

This paper reports on an electronic mentoring program, the Digital Heroes Campaign (DHC), in which 242 youth were matched with online mentors over a two-year period. Survey, focus group, and interview data, in addition to analyses of the e-mails that pairs exchanged, were examined in order to assess the nature, types, and quality of the relationships that were formed. Despite youths’ generally positive self-reports, deep connections between mentors and mentees appeared to be relatively rare. The findings suggest that online mentoring programs face significant challenges and that further research is needed to determine under what conditions online mentoring is likely to be most effective.

Editors' Strategic Implications: Given the infrequent occurrence of close connections, youth mentoring practitioners and researchers must consider whether online mentoring is likely to promote the kind of “relationships” that might be expected to promote positive youth development.

KEY WORDS

mentoring online support relationships intervention intergenerational 

REFERENCES

  1. Beier, S. R., Rosenfeld, W. D., Spitalny, K. C., Zansky, S. M., & Bontempo, A. N. (2000). The potential role of an adult mentor in influencing high risk behaviors in adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154, 327–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, D., Hupert, N., Tsikalas, K., Meade, T., & Honey, M. (1998). Critical issues in the design and implementation of telementoring environments. Centre for Children and Technology. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://www2.edc.org/CCT/admin/publications/report/09_1998.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Cravens, J. (2003). Online mentoring: Programs and suggested practices as of February 2001. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 21(1–2), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washinton, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 264–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ensher, E., & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 460–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 1361–1380.Google Scholar
  8. Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 199–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers/Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hatcher, S. (2002). Using email with your patients. Australasian Psychiatry, 9, 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kraus, R., Zack, J., & Stricker, G. (Eds.) (2004). Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals. Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. McCurdy, K. G. (2003). The perceptions of supervising counselors regarding alternative methods of communication. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(8-A). (UMI No. 2003-95003-029)Google Scholar
  15. Miller, H., & Griffiths, M. (2005). E-mentoring. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 300–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Mundorf, N., & Laird, K. (2002). Social and psychological effects of information technologies and other interactive media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 583–602). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. National Mentoring Center (2002). Perspectives on e-mentoring. A virtual panel holds an online dialogue. National Mentoring Center Newsletter, 9, 5–12. Retrieved January 26, 2006, from http://www.nwrel.org/mentoring/pdf/bull9.pdf.Google Scholar
  18. O'Neill, D. K., Wagner, R., & Gomez, L. M. (1996). Online mentors: Experimenting in science class. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 39–42.Google Scholar
  19. Parra, G. R., DuBois, D. L., Neville, H. A., & Pugh-Lilly, A. O. (2002). Mentoring relationships for youth: Investigation of a process-oriented model. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Price, M. A., & Chen, H. H. (2003). Promises and challenges: Exploring a collaborative mentoring programme in a preservice teacher education programme. Mentoring and Tutoring, 11, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today's youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Salem, D. A., Bogat, G. A., & Reid, C. (1997). Mutual help goes on-line. Journal of Community Psychology, 25(2), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanchez, B., & Harris, J. (1996). Online mentoring, a success story. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(8), 57–60.Google Scholar
  26. Scealy, M., Phillips, J., & Stevenson, R. (2003). Shyness and anxiety as predictors of patterns of Internet usage. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 507–5156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Segall, R. (2000). Online shrinks. Psychology Today, 32(3), 38–44.Google Scholar
  28. Slicker, E. K., & Palmer, D. J. (1993). Mentoring at-risk high school students: Evaluation of a school-based program. The School Counselor, 40, 327–334.Google Scholar
  29. Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, 50–57.Google Scholar
  30. Zimmerman, M. A., Bigenheimer, J. B., & Notaro, P. C. (2002). Natural mentors and adolescent resiliency: A study with urban youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 221–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean E. Rhodes
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Renée Spencer
    • 2
  • Rebecca N. Saito
    • 3
  • Cynthia L. Sipe
    • 4
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsBostonUSA
  2. 2.Boston University School of Social WorkBostonUSA
  3. 3.University of Minnesota Extenstion SeriveMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.Youth Development StrategiesLansdaleUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Massachusetts, BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations