Advertisement

Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 279–298 | Cite as

Social Networks and Community Prevention Coalitions

  • Mark E. FeinbergEmail author
  • Nathaniel R. Riggs
  • Mark T. Greenberg
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the links between community readiness and the social networks among participants in Communities That Care (CTC), community-based prevention coalitions. The coalitions targeted adolescent behavior problems through community risk factor assessments, prioritization of risk factors, and selection/implementation of corresponding evidence-based family, school, and community programs. Key leaders (n = 219) in 23 new CTC sites completed questionnaires focusing on community readiness to implement CTC and the respondents’ personal, work, and social organization links to other key leaders in the community. Outside technical assistants also completed ratings of each community’s readiness and early CTC functioning. Measures of network cohesion/integration were positively associated with readiness, while centralization was negatively associated. These results suggest that non-centralized networks in which ties between members are close and direct may be an indicator of community readiness. In addition, we found different associations between readiness and different domains of social relations. Editors’ Strategic Implications: The authors present the promising practice of using social network analysis to characterize the functioning of local prevention coalitions and their readiness to implement a community-based prevention initiative. Researchers and community planners will benefit from the lessons in this article, which capitalizes on a large sample and multiple informants. This work raises interesting questions about how to combine the promotion of coalition functioning while simultaneously encouraging diversity of coalition membership.

Keywords

prevention community partnerships social networks youth development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375–395.Google Scholar
  2. Bownes, D., & Ingersoll, S. (1997). Moblilizing communities to prevent juvenile crime. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  3. Broadbent, J. (1982). The Japanese community power structure as a template for social movement formation. Paper delivered at the meeting of the International Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8(3), 315–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chavis, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 55–81.Google Scholar
  6. Chipuer, H. M. (2001). Dyadic attachments and community connectedness: Links with youths’ loneliness experiences. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(4), 429–446.Google Scholar
  7. Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., et al. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1013–1022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, K. D. (1998). Lessons form the field: The Colorado Healthy Communities Initiative. Denver, CO: The Colorado Trust.Google Scholar
  9. Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., & Osgood, D. W. (2004a). Perceived technical assistance needs and problems in community prevention. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 263–274.Google Scholar
  10. Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., & Osgood, D. W. (2004b). Readiness, functioning, and perceived effectiveness of community prevention coalitions: A study of Communities That Care. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 163–177.Google Scholar
  11. Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Osgood, D. W., Anderson, A., & Babinski, L. (2002). The effects of training community leaders in prevention science: Communities That Care in Pennsylvania. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 245–259.Google Scholar
  12. Florin, P., Mitchell, R., & Stevenson, J. (1993). Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: A developmental approach. Health Education Research, 8(3), 417–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Florin, P., Mitchell, R., Stevenson, J., & Klein, I. (2000). Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: A developmental perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 341–346.Google Scholar
  14. Gomez, B. J., Feinberg, M. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (in press). Sustainability of prevention coalitions. Prevention Science.Google Scholar
  15. Goodman, R. M., Speers, M. A., McLeroy, K., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., Parker, E. A., et al. (1998). Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education and Behavior, 25(3), 258–278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodman, R. M., Steckler, A., Hoover, S., & Schwartz, R. (1993). A critique of contemporary community health promotion approaches: Based on a qualitative review of six programs in Maine. American Journal of Health Promotion, 7(3), 208–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F., Jr. (1992). Communities that care: Action for drug abuse prevention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Hughey, J., & Speer, P. W. (2002). Community, sense of community, and networks. In A. T. Fisher & C. C. Sonn (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications. The Plenum series in social/clinical psychology (pp. 69–84). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Kadushin, C., & Jones, D. (1992). Social networks and urban neighborhoods in New York City. City and Society, 6, 58–75.Google Scholar
  20. Kegler, M. C., Steckler, A., Malek, S. H., & McLeroy, K. (1998). A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Education Research, 13(2), 225–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kegler, M. C., Steckler, A., McLeroy, K., & Malek, S. H. (1998). Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: A study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina. Health Education and Behavior, 25(3), 338–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klitzner, M. (1993). A public health/dynamic systems approach to community-wide alcohol and other drug initiatives. In R. C. Davis, A. J. Lurigio, & D. P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Drugs and the Community (pp. 201–224). Springfield, MA: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  23. Marwell, N. P. (2001). Social networks and social capital as reources for neighborhood revitalization. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61,2944A–2945A.Google Scholar
  24. Mayer, J. P., Soweid, R., Dabney, S., Brownson, C., Goodman, R. M., & Brownson, R. C. (1998). Practices of successful community coalitions: A multiple case study. American Journal of Health Behavior, 22(5), 368–377.Google Scholar
  25. McMillan, B., Florin, P., Stevenson, J., Kerman, B., & Mitchell, R. (1995). Empowerment praxis in community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 699–727.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical conception of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127.Google Scholar
  27. National Crime Prevention Council (2000). Setting a Foundation for the Future. Albuquerque, NM: National Crime Prevention Council.Google Scholar
  28. Nylander, A. B., & Brown, R. B. (2000). The structure of community leadership in three rural Mississippi Delta communities. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Sociological Society.Google Scholar
  29. O’Brien, D. J., Hassinger, E. W., & Brown, R. B. (1990). The social networks of leaders in high and low viability communities. Paper presented at the meeting of the Rural Sociological Society.Google Scholar
  30. Obst, P., Smith, S. G., & Zinkiewicz, L. (2002). An exploration of sense of community, Part 3: Dimensions and predictors of psychological sense of community in geographical communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 119–133.Google Scholar
  31. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (1999). 1999 Report to Congress: Title V Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Programs. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  32. Pease, J. H., & Pease, W. H. (1982). Social structure and the potential for urban change: Boston and Charleston in the 1830s. Journal of Urban History, 8, 171–195.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, R. N., & Wasik, B. H. (1996). Evaluating the 1992 and 1993 Community Integrated Service System Projects. New Directions for Evaluation, 69, 35–49.Google Scholar
  34. Toumbourou, J. W. (1999). Implementing Communities That Care in Australia: A community mobilisation approach to crime prevention. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  35. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Weimann, G. (1983). The strength of weak conversational ties in the flow of information and influence. Social Networks, 5, 245–267.Google Scholar
  37. Zeldin, S. (2002). Sense of community and positive adult beliefs toward adolescents and youth policy in urban neighborhoods and small cities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(5), 331–342.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark E. Feinberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nathaniel R. Riggs
    • 1
  • Mark T. Greenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Prevention Research CenterThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations