How Connectedness Contributes to Experimental Smoking Among Rural Youth: Developmental and Ecological Analyses
- 186 Downloads
The influences of peer, sibling, and parents’ smoking on adolescents’ initiation of tobacco use have been explained as a function of peer pressure, genetics, and social learning processes, but rarely in combination or with assessments of the quality of these relationships. This study examined the additional contributions of connectedness to friends, siblings, parents, and teachers beyond the effects of friend, sibling, and parental smoking using logistic regression analyses with a cross-sectional middle and high school sample of 303 rural adolescents. Friends’ and siblings’ smoking, and connectedness to friends, were the strongest predictors of experimental smoking. Parental smoking and connectedness to parents and to teachers were significant predictors of experimental smoking when considered independently, but not after accounting for friend and sibling factors. Connectedness to parents and teachers decreased the odds of experimental smoking, while connectedness to friends increased the odds.
Editors’ Strategic Implications: This strategy of assessing connectedness to–and smoking behaviors of—friends, siblings, teachers, and parents shows promise in predicting teens’ cigarette smoking choices. The finding that the negative effects of unconventional connectedness and smoking by friends and siblings outweigh positive effects of connectedness to adults awaits replication with different samples and measures.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bentler, P. M., Newcomb, M. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2002). Cigarette use and drug use progression: Growth trajectory and lagged effect hypothesis. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Stages and pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis (pp. 223–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brook, J. S., Brook, D. W., Whiteman, M., Gordon, A. S., & Cohen, P. (1990). The psychosocial etiology of adolescent drug use and abuse. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116(2), 111–267.Google Scholar
- Bruvold, W. H. (1993). A meta-analysis of adolescent smoking prevention programs. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 872–880.Google Scholar
- Castro, F., Maddahian, E., Newcomb, M., & Bentler, P. (1987). A multivariate model of the determinants of cigarette smoking among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 273–289.Google Scholar
- Conrad, K. M., Flay, B. R., & Hill, D. (1992). Why children start smoking cigarettes: Predictors of onset. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 1711–1724.Google Scholar
- De Civita, M., & Pagani, L. (1996). Familial constraints on the initiation of cigarette smoking among adolescents: An elaboration of social bonding theory and differential association theory. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 12, 177–190.Google Scholar
- DeFronzo, J., & Pawlak, R. (1994). Gender differences in the determinants of smoking. The Journal of Drug Issues, 24, 507–516.Google Scholar
- Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1998). Individuality and connectedness in adolescent development: Review and prospects for research on identity, relationships, and context. In E. Skoe, E. Aspaas, & A. L. Von der Lippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross national and life span perspective (pp. 3–37). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychological development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kandel, D. B., & Wu, P. (1995). The contribution of mothers and fathers to the intergenerational transmission of cigarette smoking in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5, 225–252.Google Scholar
- Karcher, M. J. (2001). Measuring adolescent connectedness: Four validation studies. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Koepke, D., Flay, B. R., & Johnson, C. A. (1990). Health behaviors in minority families: The case of cigarette smoking. Family Community Health, 13, 35–43.Google Scholar
- Krohn, M. D., Skinner, W. F., Zielinski, M., & Naughton, M. (1989). Elaborating the relationship between age and adolescent cigarette smoking. Deviant Behavior, 10, 105–129.Google Scholar
- Langlois, M. A., Petosa, R., & Hallam, J. S. (1999). Why do effective smoking prevention programs work? Student changes in social cognitive theory constructs. Journal of School Health, 69(8), 326–331.Google Scholar
- Nakkula, M. J., & Karcher, M. J. (1999). Risk and Prevention Questionnaire-Revised (RAP-QR). Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
- Rundell, T. G., & Bruvold, W. H. (1988). A meta-analysis of school-based smoking and alcohol use prevention programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 317–334.Google Scholar
- Way, N., Stauber, H. Y., Nakkula, M. J., & London, P. (1994). Depression and substance use in two divergent high school cultures: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 23(3), 331–357.Google Scholar
- Youniss, J., & Ketterlinus, R. D. (1987). Communication and connectedness in mother- and father-adolescent relationships. Special Issue: Sex differences in family relations at adolescence. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 16(3), 265–280.Google Scholar