Advertisement

Journal of Primary Prevention

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 25–36 | Cite as

How Connectedness Contributes to Experimental Smoking Among Rural Youth: Developmental and Ecological Analyses

  • Michael J. Karcher
  • Laurel Finn
Article

Abstract

The influences of peer, sibling, and parents’ smoking on adolescents’ initiation of tobacco use have been explained as a function of peer pressure, genetics, and social learning processes, but rarely in combination or with assessments of the quality of these relationships. This study examined the additional contributions of connectedness to friends, siblings, parents, and teachers beyond the effects of friend, sibling, and parental smoking using logistic regression analyses with a cross-sectional middle and high school sample of 303 rural adolescents. Friends’ and siblings’ smoking, and connectedness to friends, were the strongest predictors of experimental smoking. Parental smoking and connectedness to parents and to teachers were significant predictors of experimental smoking when considered independently, but not after accounting for friend and sibling factors. Connectedness to parents and teachers decreased the odds of experimental smoking, while connectedness to friends increased the odds.

Editors’ Strategic Implications: This strategy of assessing connectedness to–and smoking behaviors of—friends, siblings, teachers, and parents shows promise in predicting teens’ cigarette smoking choices. The finding that the negative effects of unconventional connectedness and smoking by friends and siblings outweigh positive effects of connectedness to adults awaits replication with different samples and measures.

connectedness smoking rural youth belonging risk-taking behavior mobility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bentler, P. M., Newcomb, M. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2002). Cigarette use and drug use progression: Growth trajectory and lagged effect hypothesis. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Stages and pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis (pp. 223–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bonny, A. E., Britto, M. T., Klostermann, B. K., Hornung, R. W., & Slap, G. B. (2000). School disconnectedness: Identifying adolescents at risk. Pediatrics, 106(5), 1017–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brook, J. S., Brook, D. W., Whiteman, M., Gordon, A. S., & Cohen, P. (1990). The psychosocial etiology of adolescent drug use and abuse. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116(2), 111–267.Google Scholar
  4. Bruvold, W. H. (1993). A meta-analysis of adolescent smoking prevention programs. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 872–880.Google Scholar
  5. Bussell, D. A., Neiderhiser, J. M., Pike, A., Plomin, R., Simmens, S., Howe, G. W., et al. (1999). Adolescents’ relationships to siblings and mothers: A multivariate genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1248–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro, F., Maddahian, E., Newcomb, M., & Bentler, P. (1987). A multivariate model of the determinants of cigarette smoking among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 273–289.Google Scholar
  7. Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Todd, M., Rose, J. S., & Sherman, S. J. (1998). Maternal socialization of adolescent smoking: The intergenerational transmission of parenting and smoking. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1189–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrad, K. M., Flay, B. R., & Hill, D. (1992). Why children start smoking cigarettes: Predictors of onset. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 1711–1724.Google Scholar
  9. De Civita, M., & Pagani, L. (1996). Familial constraints on the initiation of cigarette smoking among adolescents: An elaboration of social bonding theory and differential association theory. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 12, 177–190.Google Scholar
  10. DeFronzo, J., & Pawlak, R. (1994). Gender differences in the determinants of smoking. The Journal of Drug Issues, 24, 507–516.Google Scholar
  11. Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1998). Individuality and connectedness in adolescent development: Review and prospects for research on identity, relationships, and context. In E. Skoe, E. Aspaas, & A. L. Von der Lippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross national and life span perspective (pp. 3–37). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hendry, L. B., & Reid, M. (2000). Social relationships and health: The meaning of social “connectedness” and how it relates to health concerns for rural Scottish adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 23(6), 705–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobson, K. C., & Rowe, D. C. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on the relationships between family connectedness, school connectedness, and adolescent depressed mood: Sex differences. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 926–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jessor, R. (1992). Risk behavior in Adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Developmental Review, 12, 374–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychological development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kandel, D. B., & Wu, P. (1995). The contribution of mothers and fathers to the intergenerational transmission of cigarette smoking in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5, 225–252.Google Scholar
  17. Karcher, M. J. (2001). Measuring adolescent connectedness: Four validation studies. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  18. Karcher, M. J. (2002). The cycle of violence and disconnection among rural middle school students: Teacher disconnection as a consequence of violence. The Journal of School Violence, 1(1), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koepke, D., Flay, B. R., & Johnson, C. A. (1990). Health behaviors in minority families: The case of cigarette smoking. Family Community Health, 13, 35–43.Google Scholar
  20. Krohn, M. D., Skinner, W. F., Zielinski, M., & Naughton, M. (1989). Elaborating the relationship between age and adolescent cigarette smoking. Deviant Behavior, 10, 105–129.Google Scholar
  21. Langlois, M. A., Petosa, R., & Hallam, J. S. (1999). Why do effective smoking prevention programs work? Student changes in social cognitive theory constructs. Journal of School Health, 69(8), 326–331.Google Scholar
  22. Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1997). Children’s relationships with adults and peers: An examination of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakkula, M. J., & Karcher, M. J. (1999). Risk and Prevention Questionnaire-Revised (RAP-QR). Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  24. Pederson, L. L., Koval, J. J., & O’Connor, K. (1997). Are psychosocial factors related to smoking in grade-6 students? Addictive Behaviors, 22, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rundell, T. G., & Bruvold, W. H. (1988). A meta-analysis of school-based smoking and alcohol use prevention programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 317–334.Google Scholar
  26. Stanton, W. R., & Silva, P. A. (1992). A longitudinal study of the influence of parents and friends on children’s initiation of smoking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turbin, M. S., Jessor, R., & Costa, F. M. (2000). Adolescent cigarette smoking: Health-related behavior or normative transgression? Prevention Science, 1, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Way, N., Stauber, H. Y., Nakkula, M. J., & London, P. (1994). Depression and substance use in two divergent high school cultures: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 23(3), 331–357.Google Scholar
  29. Youniss, J., & Ketterlinus, R. D. (1987). Communication and connectedness in mother- and father-adolescent relationships. Special Issue: Sex differences in family relations at adolescence. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 16(3), 265–280.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin – MadisonUSA
  2. 2.College of Education and Human DevelopmentUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan Antonio

Personalised recommendations