Journal of Porous Materials

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1607–1618 | Cite as

MIL-101(Cr)/graphene hybrid aerogel used as a highly effective adsorbent for wastewater purification

  • Pengchao Hou
  • Guangjian XingEmail author
  • Dan Han
  • Yan Zhao
  • Gang Zhang
  • Hao Wang
  • Chang Zhao
  • Chunna Yu


MIL-101(Cr)/graphene aerogel (MIL-101(Cr)/GA) was synthesized using a two-step synthesis and used as a high efficient adsorbent for wastewater purification. The as-prepared MIL-101(Cr)/GA was characterized using XRD, FTIR and Raman spectroscopy, XPS and FESEM to investigate its structure, composition and morphology. MIL-101(Cr)/GA exhibited a 3D interconnected macroporous framework comprised of graphene sheets, on which MIL-101(Cr) particles were dispersed uniformly. Dyes, organic solvents and oils were used to evaluate the adsorption performance of MIL-101(Cr)/GA, which exhibited an excellent adsorption capacity for both anionic methyl orange (331.5 mg g−1) and cationic rhodamine B (345.7 mg g−1) as well as 51–101 times its own weight of various solvents/oils. In addition, the MIL-101(Cr)/GA showed superior recycling stability for dyes and a rapid adsorption rate for solvents/oils. The excellent adsorption performance was attributed to a synergistic effect between MIL-101 and the graphene aerogel. The kinetic behavior for adsorption observed for MIL-101(Cr)/GA was well-fitted by a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. It is envisaged that MIL-101(Cr)/GA will be a promising adsorbent for the removal of pollutants and wastewater purification.


Graphene Hybrid Aerogel Adsorption 



This work was supported by the Nation Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant No. 21501012), the Scientific Research Project of Beijing Educational Committee (No. KM201710017007), and the Institute of nano-photoelectronics and high energy physics.


  1. 1.
    W. Lv, Q. Mei, J. Xiao, M. Du, Q. Zheng, 3D multiscale superhydrophilic sponges with delicately designed pore size for ultrafast oil/water separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(1–9), 1704293 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Guan, Y.F. Tong, J.W. Li, D.B. Li, S.F. Wu, Research on ultraviolet-visible absorption spectrum preprocessing for water quality contamination detection. Optik 164, 277–288 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.P. Zhao, Z.L. Mo, P. Zhang, B. Wang, X.B. Zhu, R.B. Guo, Synthesis of graphene/Fe3O4/NiO magnetic nanocomposites and its application in photocatalytic degradation the organic pollutants in wastewater. J. Porous Mater. 22, 1245–1253 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.K. Jain, V.K. Gupta, A. Bhatnagar, Utilization of industrial waste products as adsorbents for the removal of dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 101, 31–42 (2003)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Vasudevan, M.A. Oturan, Electrochemistry: as cause and cure in water pollution-an overview. Environ. Chem. Lett. 12, 97–108 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V.K. Gupta, I. Ali, T.A. Saleh, A. Nayak, S. Agarwal, Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling-an overview. RSC Adv. 2, 6380–6388 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Behvandi, A.A. Safekordi, F. Khorasheh, Removal of benzoic acid from industrial wastewater using metal organic frameworks: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. J. Porous Mater. 24, 165–178 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O.S. Panwar, M. Kumar, S. Kumar, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of nitrogen incorporated amorphous carbon films embedded with nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 7371–7376 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Sabarish, G. Unnikrishnan, PVA/PDADMAC/ZSM-5 zeolite hybrid matrix membranes for dye adsorption: fabrication, characterization, adsorption, kinetics and antimicrobial properties. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6, 3860–3873 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Harja, G. Ciobanu, Studies on adsorption of oxytetracycline from aqueous solutions onto hydroxyapatite. Sci. Total Environ. 628–629, 36–43 (2018)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.T. Akar, S. Aslan, T. Akar, Conversion of natural mineral to effective geosorbent by coating MnO2 and its application potential for dye contaminated wastewaters. J. Clean. Prod. 189, 887–897 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Zhang, G.Q. Huang, C. Liu, R.N. Zhang, X.X. Chen, L. Zhang, Synergistic effect of microbubbles and activated carbon on the ozonation treatment of synthetic dyeing wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 201, 10–18 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Baltes, S. Patachia, M. Tierean, O. Ekincioglu, M.H. Ozkul, Photoactive polymer-cement composites for tannins removal from wastewaters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6, 4357–4367 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I.G. Georgiev, L.R. MacGillivray, Metal-mediated reactivity in the organic solid state: from self-assembled complexes to metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 1239–1248 (2007)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Schneemann, V. Bon, I. Schwedler, I. Senkovska, S. Kaskel, R.A. Fischer, Flexible metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6062–6096 (2014)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.X. Yang, X.P. Yan, Metal-organic framework MIL-101(Cr) for high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of substituted aromatics. Anal. Chem. 83, 7144–7150 (2011)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y.K. Seo, J.W. Yoon, J.S. Lee, Y.K. Hwang, C.H. Jun, J.S. Chang, S. Wuttke, P. Bazin, A. Vimont, M. Daturi, S. Bourrelly, P.L. Llewellyn, P. Horcajada, C. Serre, Gérard Férey, Energy-efficient dehumidification over hierachically porous metal-organic frameworks as advanced water adsorbents. Adv. Mater. 24, 806–810 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Wang, P. Zhao, N. Lu, H.C. Chen, C.L. Zhang, X.H. Hou, Facile fabrication of Fe3O4/MIL-101(Cr) for effective removal of acid red 1 and orange G from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 295, 403–413 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Karmakar, D. Roy, C. Janiak, S. De, Insights into multi-component adsorption of reactive dyes on MIL-101-Cr metal organic framework: experimental and modeling approach. Sep. Purif. Technol. 215, 259–275 (2019)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.P. Yang, W.B. Zhu, W.Q. Qu, Z.Q. Yang, J. Wang, M.G. Zhang, H.L. Li, Selenium functionalized metal-organic framework MIL-101 for efficient and permanent sequestration of mercury. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 2260–2268 (2019)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Z.X. Zhao, X.M. Li, Z. Li, Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of p-xylene on chromium-based metal organic framework MIL-101. Chem. Eng. J. 173, 150–157 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Shi, Z.X. Zhao, Q.B. Xia, Y.W. Li, Z. Li, Adsorption and diffusion of ethyl acetate on the chromium-based metal-organic framework MIL-101. J. Chem. Eng. Data 56, 3419–3425 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S.H. Jhung, J.H. Lee, J.W. Yoon, C. Serre, G. Férey, J.S. Chang, Microwave synthesis of chromium terephthalate MIL-101 and its benzene sorption ability. Adv. Mater. 19, 121–124 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Hu, Z.B. Zhao, W.B. Wan, Y. Gogotsi, J.S. Qiu, Ultralight and highly compressible graphene aerogels. Adv. Mater. 25, 2219–2223 (2013)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Q.X. Yang, R. Lu, S.S. Ren, C.T. Chen, Z.J. Chen, X.Y. Yang, Three dimensional reduced graphene oxide/ZIF-67 aerogel: effective removal cationic and anionic dyes from water. Chem. Eng. J. 348, 202–211 (2018)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.J. Mao, M.Z. Ge, J.Y. Huang, Y.K. Lai, C.J. Lin, K.Q. Zhang, K. Meng, Y.X. Tang, Constructing multifunctional MOF@rGO hydro-/aerogels by the self-assembly process for customized water remediation. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11873–11881 (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y.J. Wan, J.Z. Wang, F. Huang, Y.N. Xue, N. Cai, J. Liu, W.M. Chen, F.Q. Yu, Synergistic effect of adsorption coupled with catalysis based on graphene-supported MOF hybrid aerogel for promoted removal of dyes. RSC Adv. 8, 34552–34559 (2018)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    X. Zhang, Q. Liang, Q. Han, W. Wan, M. Ding, Metal-organic frameworks@graphene hybrid aerogels for solid-phase extraction of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selective enrichment of proteins. Analyst 141, 4219–4226 (2016)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Zhao, L. Yang, P. Feng, I. Gruber, C. Janiak, Y.J. Liu, Facile synthesis of nano-sized MIL-101(Cr) with the addition of acetic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 471, 440–445 (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    W.S. Hummers, R.E. Offeman, Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339 (1958)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    F. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Zhan, S. Yu, W. Zhong, G. Sui, X. Yang, Facile synthesis of ultra-light graphene aerogels with super absorption capability for organic solvents and strain-sensitive electrical conductivity. Chem. Eng. J. 320, 539–548 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. Férey, C. Mellot-Draznieks, C. Serre, F. Millange, J. Dutour, S. Surble, L. Margiolaki, A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science 309, 2040–2042 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. Yang, Q. Sun, F. Xue, D.H. Lin, Adsorption of volatile organic compounds by metal-organic frameworks MIL-101: influence of molecular size and shape. J. Hazard. Mater. 195, 124–131 (2011)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Z.Y. Gu, X.P. Yan, Metal-organic framework MIL-101 for high-resolution gas-chromatographic separation of xylene isomers and ethylbenzene. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 49, 1477–1480 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    L. Chen, X.S. Hou, N. Song, L.Y. Shi, P. Ding, Cellulose/graphene bioplastic for thermal management: enhanced isotropic thermally conductive property by three-dimensional interconnected graphene aerogel. Compos. Part A 107, 189–196 (2018)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    D.B. Xiong, X.F. Li, Z.M. Bai, H. Shan, L.L. Fan, C.X. Wu, D.J. Li, S.G. Lu, Superior cathode performance of nitrogen-doped graphene frameworks for lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 10643–10651 (2017)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    L. Xu, G. Xiao, C. Chen, R. Li, Y. Mai, G. Sun, D. Yan, Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic graphene aerogel prepared by facile chemical reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 7498–7504 (2015)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    K.C. Bedin, A.C. Martins, A.L. Cazetta, O. Pezoti, V.C. Almeida, KOH-activated carbon prepared from sucrose spherical carbon: adsorption equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for methylene blue removal. Chem. Eng. J. 286, 476–484 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    X.J. Sun, Q.B. Xia, Z.X. Zhao, Y.W. Li, Z. Li, Synthesis and adsorption performance of MIL-101(Cr)/graphite oxide composites with high capacities of n-hexane. Chem. Eng. J. 239, 226–232 (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    J.H. Li, J.Y. Li, H. Meng, S.Y. Xie, B.W. Zhang, L.F. Li, H.J. Ma, J.Y. Zhang, M. Yu, Ultra-light, compressible and fire-resistant graphene aerogel as a highly efficient and recyclable absorbent for organic liquids. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 2934–2941 (2014)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    M.A. Lillo-Ródenas, D. Cazorla-Amoós, A. Linares-Solano, Behaviour of activated carbons with different pore size distributions and surface oxygen groups for benzene and toluene adsorption at low concentrations. Carbon 43, 1758–1767 (2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.A. Riaz, P. Hadi, I.H. Abidi, A. Tyagi, X.W. Ou, Z.T. Luo, Recyclable 3D graphene aerogel with bimodal pore structure for ultrafast and selective oil sorption from water. RSC Adv. 7, 29722–29731 (2017)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    R.P. Ren, W. Li, Y.K. Lv, A robust, superhydrophobic graphene aerogel as a recyclable sorbent for oils and organic solvents at various temperatures. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 500, 63–68 (2017)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    M. Shafiei, M.S. Alivand, A. Rashidi, A. Samimi, D. Mohebbi-Kalhori, Synthesis and adsorption performance of a modified micro-mesoporous MIL-101(Cr) for VOCs removal at ambient conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 341, 164–174 (2018)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    S.J. Han, Q.F. Sun, H.H. Zheng, J.P. Li, C.D. Jin, Green and facile fabrication of carbon aerogels from cellulose-based waste newspaper for solving organic pollution. Carbohydr. Polym. 136, 95–100 (2016)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    V.K. Gupta, P.J.M. Carrott, M.M.L. Ribeiro Carrott, Suhas, Low-cost adsorbents: growing approach to wastewater treatment-a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 783–842 (2009)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    S. Babel, T.A. Kurniawan, Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 97, 219–243 (2003)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. Chakravarty, V. Dureja, G. Bhattacharyya, S. Maity, S. Bhattacharjee, Removal of arsenic from groundwater using low cost ferruginous manganese ore. Water Res. 36, 625–632 (2002)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M.B. Ahmed, J.L. Zhou, H.H. Ngo, W.S. Guo, Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis. Biomass Bioenerg. 84, 76–86 (2016)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    G. Atun, G. Hisarli, W.S. Sheldrick, M. Muhler, Adsorptive removal of methylene blue from colored effluents on fuller’s earth. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 261, 32–39 (2003)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    M.B. Ahmed, J.L. Zhou, H.H. Ngo, W.S. Guo, Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: progress and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 532, 112–126 (2015)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    P. K. Thallapally, D. M. Strachan, Initial proof-of-principle for near room temperature Xe and Kr separation from air with MOFs, PNNL-21452, PNNL, (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science & EngineeringBeijing Institute of Petrochemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Materials Science & EngineeringBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Nano-photoelectronics and High Energy PhysicsBeijing Institute of Petrochemical TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations