Advertisement

Journal of Porous Materials

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 45–53 | Cite as

Morphological and chemical characterization of highly ordered conical-pore anodic alumina prepared by multistep citric acid anodizing and chemical etching process

  • Małgorzata NorekEmail author
  • Maksymilian Włodarski
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Highly ordered, conical-pore anodic alumina (AAO) membranes with interpore distance (D c ) between ca. 530 and 620 nm and thickness ranging between 2.4 and 7.8 μm, were produced. In the fabrication process aluminum surface was first pre-patterned by the anodization in etidronic acid solution. Then, the regular arrays of Al concaves were used as nucleation sites to grow AAO during the second anodization, which was carried out in highly concentrated citric acid solution (20 wt%) and at relatively high temperature (33–35 °C). The conical pore shape was engineered by a multistep process combining anodization in the citric acid electrolyte and the subsequent chemical pore broadening in phosphoric acid solution. The morphological analyses has revealed that the geometrical parameters of the Al concaves were successfully transferred to the AAO membranes. Furthermore, FTIR spectra analysis confirmed that the electrolyte species, such as phosphonate and citric ions, are being embedded into the AAO framework during the anodization. The graded-index structure formed in AAO can be used for a production of antireflective coatings operating in a broad spectral range.

Keywords

Etidronic acid Citric acid Guided anodization Tapered pores IR spectra 

1 Introduction

Anodic alumina (AAO) membrane is a porous material with uniform, parallel nanochannels that can be used to produce various nanostructures [1, 2]. Its geometrical parameters, such as interpore distance or the membrane thickness, can be fully regulated by anodizing conditions [3]. While the interpore distance (D c ) in the AAO is controlled mainly by the applied voltage, the AAO thickness depends also on current density and the anodization time. It is well known that highly ordered AAO with pores arranged into a close-packed hexagonal structure are obtained solely within a relatively narrow window of operating conditions (proper voltages, concentrations of electrolyte, temperature, etc.), so-called self-ordering conditions (or self-ordering regimes). Out of these regimes, the pore arrangement deteriorates. The self-ordering conditions were found in many electrolytes including oxalic, sulfuric, phosphoric, or etidronic acid solution [4]. The dissociation constants (pKa) of a given acid determines the critical potential (the highest self-ordering voltage) under which it is still possible to conduct a stable anodization. The highest critical potential of 270 V was applied during the anodization in etidronic acid solution [5, 6]. The AAO with D c ~700 nm was thus obtained. Anodization under voltages > 300 V were performed in citric acid electrolytes and resulted in the AAO with ultra-large D c (in micrometer scale) [7, 8, 9]. However, application of the high voltages and relatively low concentration of citric acid solutions caused formation of a non-uniform anodic oxide without hexagonal, close-packed arrangement of pores [10, 11, 12].

Guided anodization is one of the most efficient method to produce highly ordered AAO even out of the self-ordering regimes. A perfectly ordered AAO membranes were synthesized by application of expensive and time consuming pre-patterning methods [13, 14, 15]. However, a very regular AAO membranes can be also produced by a much more affordable experimental approach, which is based on application of hard anodization (HA) in the first step, followed by the mild anodization (MA) in the second step [16, 17, 18]. In this approach, a highly regular nano-concave arrays, patterned on aluminum upon removal of AAO formed in HA, serve as nucleation sites for AAO growth during MA.

It is also possible to design a various shape of pores in AAO by application of a pulse anodization methods [19, 20]. Recently, AAOs with tapered pores and pitch size in the range of 100–490 nm were fabricated [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27]. The tapered-pore AAO is very attractive porous material because it can act as a layer for the gradually changing refractive index. The graded-index nanostructures are insensitive to polarization effects, guaranteeing broad-band and omni-directional anti-reflectivity properties required for a perfect anti-reflective (AR) performance [28, 29, 30]. The AAO templates with D c between 100 and 200 nm were successfully used for preparing polymer AR coatings operating in visible and NIR range [31, 32]. It is, however, expected that upon the increase of AAO geometrical parameters, including D c and AAO thickness, the AR properties can be expanded beyond the NIR spectral range [33, 34].

In this work, highly ordered tapered-pore AAO membranes, with D c in the range 530–620 nm and thickness ranging between 2.4 and 7.8 μm, are fabricated. The tapered-pore AAO matrices of such geometry and a high level of pore ordering have not been produced before. In the fabrication process, a guided anodization was used. First, aluminum surface was pre-patterned (Al concave arrays at the surface) during the self-ordering anodization conducted in 0.3 M etidronic acid solution. Next, the regular Al concave arrays were used to grow AAO by high-temperature, high-concentration citric acid anodizing. The pores with conical shape were engineered by alternating anodization in the citric acid electrolyte and etching in phosphoric acid solution. The guided anodization resulted in a production of highly ordered, close-packed hexagonal arrays of pores in AAO, which was not observed before during the anodization in citric acid electrolyte. Moreover, a detailed morphological and chemical analysis of the obtained porous material was performed and discussed. It was confirmed that electrolyte species, such as phosphonate or citric acid ions, are being incorporated into the AAO framework during the synthesis.

2 Experimental

High-purity aluminum foil (99.9995% Al, Goodfellow, UK) with a thickness of about 0.25 mm was cut into rectangular specimens (2 cm × 1 cm). Before the anodization process the Al foils were degreased in acetone and ethanol and subsequently electropolished in a 1:4 mixture of 60% HClO4 and ethanol at 0 °C, constant voltage of 20 V, for 2.5 min. Next, the samples were rinsed with a distilled water, ethanol and dried. As prepared Al specimens were insulated at the back and the edges with acid resistant tape, and serve as the anode. A Pt grid was used as a cathode and the distance between both electrodes was kept constant (ca. 5 cm). A large, 1L electrochemical cell and cooling bath thermostat (model MPC-K6, Huber company) were employed in the anodizing process. An adjustable DC power supply with voltage range of 0–300 V and current range of 0–5 A, purchased from NDN, model GEN750_1500 TDK Lambda, was used to control the applied voltage.

The first anodization was carried out in 0.3 M etidronic acid solution (Sigma-Aldrich) at 210, 235, and 260 V and temperature of 38, 27, and 21 °C, respectively (the formed oxides are denoted as: eAAO-1, eAAO-2, and eAAO-3, respectively). Before application of the high voltages, the samples were first pre-anodized at 80 V (for ~1 min). Then, the voltage was increased to the target values and all samples were anodized for 8 h. As obtained alumina was chemically removed in a mixture of 6 wt% phosphoric acid and 1.8 wt% chromic acid at 60 °C for 180 min. The respective Al concave arrays obtained after the eAAOs removal are denoted as Al conc-1, Al conc-2, and Al conc-3. Second anodization was performed in the 20 wt% citric acid solution (the respective samples are denoted as cAAO-1, c-AAO-2, and cAAO-3) under different anodizing voltage and temperature values: the sample cAAO-1 was anodized at 210 V and 35 °C, the sample cAAO-2 at 230 V and 35 °C, and the sample cAAO-3 at 250 V and 33 °C (Table 1). For pore broadening a 10 wt% solution of phosphoric acid was used. The pore shaping was made by alternating citric acid anodizing and pore etching in phosphoric acid. In the Fig. 1, the scheme of the pore engineering process is presented, where the etching steps were denoted by Roman numerals (I, II, ..,i), whereas the anodization steps were marked by Arabic numerals (1, 2, …,i).

Table 1

Interpore distance (D c ) and regularity parameter (R) determined for the Al concave arrays (Fig. 2) and the conical-pore AAO membranes (cAAOs) (Fig. 3)

Sample name

Al conc-1

Al conc-2

Al conc-3

1st anodization parameters

210 V T = 38 °C

235 V T = 27 °C

260 V

T = 21 °C

Al concaves

 D c (nm)

539 ± 13

581 ± 10

647 ± 17

 R (a.u.)

5.1 ± 0.3

4.5 ± 0.7

2.8 ± 1.1

Sample name

cAAO-1

cAAO-2

cAAO-3

2nd anodization parameters

210 V

T = 35 °C

230 V

T = 35 °C

250 V

T = 33 °C

Conical-pore cAAO

 D c (nm)

532 ± 11

569 ± 9

623 ± 12

 R (a.u.)

5.5 ± 0.2

4.9 ± 0.6

4.4 ± 0.8

Fig. 1

A scheme demonstrating a tapered pore structure engineered by a multistep anodization in citric acid electrolyte and pore broadening in phosphoric acid solution

Fig. 2

SEM images (a, d, g), fast Fourier transforms (FFT) (b, e, h) with their radial averages (c, f, i) of Al conc-1 (a, b, c), Al conc-2 (d, e, f), and Al conc-3 (g, h, i) samples; the insets in the SEM images show the 3D FFT images of the respective samples

Fig. 3

SEM images (a, d, g), fast Fourier transforms (FFT) (b, e, h) with their radial averages (c, f, i) of the top surface of cAAO-1 (a, b, c), cAAO-2 (d, e, f), and cAAO-3 (g, h, i) membranes; the insets in the SEM images show the 3D FFT images of the respective samples

Morphology of PAAs was studied using field-emission scanning electron microscope FE-SEM (FEI, Quanta) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS).

To obtain geometrical parameters of the fabricated Al concaves and cAAO membranes, Fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) were generated based on three SEM images taken at the same magnification for every anodizing voltage, and were further used in calculations with WSxM software [35, 36]. The average interpore distance (D c ) was estimated as an inverse of the FFT’s radial average from three FE-SEM images for each sample [37]. To estimate a semi-quantitative regularity parameter (R), radial average was generated from each FFT image. The R was calculated according to the following formula (1) [38]:
$$R=~\frac{H}{{{W_{1/2}}}} \cdot \frac{{\sqrt n }}{{{S^{3/2}}}}$$
(1)
where n is the number of pores, S is the analyzed surface area, H is the maximal intensity value of the FFT intensity profile, and W 1/2 is the width of the intensity profile at half of its height.

FTIR spectra were recorded using Spectrum GX Optica spectrometer from Perkin-Elmer with diffuse reflectance accessory. Light scattered from surface of the sample was collected in a full π steradian angle. The angle of incidence was 38°. Aluminum sheet was used as a 100% reflectance reference sample.

3 Results and discussion

Etidronic acid anodizing was conducted according to the approach presented elsewhere [5, 6]. In this approach, the anodization starts at relatively low voltage (80 V) which is subsequently increased to a target value. As an effect, the top part of the AAO is highly irregular. Therefore, the eAAO membranes produced during the first anodization in 0.3 M etidronic acid solution at various anodizing conditions were removed in order to obtain a regular array of concaves on Al surface, which were subjected to morphological analysis and further fabrication process. In Fig. 2, SEM images (Fig. 2a, d, g), 2D (Fig. 2b, e, h) and 3D FFT images (the insets in the corresponding SEM images), and radial averages (Fig. 2c, f, i) of Al concaves, are demonstrated. The images in Fig. 1 show that highly ordered pore assembly was fabricated. The pores are uniform and organized into a hexagonal close-packed structure. However, in the Al conc-3 the domains of an ideal hexagonal pore arrangement are smaller as compared to the domains in the Al conc-1 and Al conc-2 samples. This is also reflected in more blurred FFT rings and, consequently, broader peaks in the radial average profile (Fig. 2h, i). The lower pore regularity is most likely due to the anodization conditions that were slightly out of the self-ordering regime [39, 40]. The anodization at 260 V was carried out at temperature of 21 °C which was probably too low to provide sufficient forces (e.g. mechanical stress at the pore bottom) to form larger domains of hexagonal pore ordering. However, it was difficult to maintain a stable anodization at temperature higher than 21 °C within a sufficiently long time to allow for an optimal pore reorganization process. The shorter anodization time at temperature of 23 °C provided even poorer pore arrangement. On the other hand, the anodization at temperature higher than 23 °C resulted most often in the sample burning. Therefore, it was assumed that the anodization parameters were optimal for this sample. In Table 1 the interpore distance (D c ) values determined for the Al concave arrays are given. With the increasing anodizing potential the D c increases from around 539 nm for the sample anodized at 210 V to around 647 nm for the sample anodizes at 260 V. Moreover, a semi quantitative R parameter was calculated based on the Eq. 1 (Experimental part) to estimate the level of the hexagonal pore arrangement. As can be seen, the R values are significantly higher for the Al conc-1 and Al conc-2 samples as compared to the sample Al conc-3.

In order to obtain the tapered pore structure in AAO, the Al concaves were subjected to a multistep process of anodization in citric acid electrolyte and subsequent pore etching in 10 wt% phosphoric acid solution at room temperature, using similar approach to that presented in the previous works [21, 22, 23, 24]. The process was repeated until the desired pore shape and AAO membrane thickness was obtained. The citric acid was chosen because it allows for a stable anodization at high voltage values [41]. In the guided anodization it is important to adjust the operating conditions to the distance between nano-concave centers on the Al surface. It is generally accepted that the applied voltage should be close to the D c /ζ ratio, where the factor ζ ~ 2.5 for mild anodization [42]. Consequently, the voltage of 210, 230, and 250 V were selected for the anodization of the Al-conc-1, Al-conc-2, and Al-conc-3 samples, respectively. The parameters used for the synthesis of tapered-pore cAAO membranes are gathered in Table 2. The anodization and chemical etching times were set based on previously estimated AAO growth rate (around 2.5, 3.7, and 6.6 μm/h, for cAAO-1, cAAO-2, and cAAO-3, respectively) and the rate of pore diameter broadening (41–45 nm/h), respectively. The number of etching steps was adjusted to the D c values. In general, the greater the D c values, the larger should be the number of the etching steps. Moreover, in the pore shape engineering a slight increase of pore diameter with anodizing voltage was taken into account [43]. The effect was previously ascribed to the high current density and strong chemical dissolution enhanced by the electric field [44].

Table 2

The parameters used to fabricate conical-pore AAO membranes (cAAO)

Sample

Temperature (°C)

Voltage (V)

Anodizing steps

Anodizing time by stepa (min)

Pore broadening steps

Pore broadening time by step (h)

cAAO-1

35

210

10

5

9

1

cAAO-2

35

230

11

5

10

1

cAAO-3

33

250

12

5

11

1

aExcept the duration of the first anodization step which was always 15 min

In Fig. 3, SEM images (Fig. 3a, d, g), 2D (Fig. 3b, e, h) and 3D FFT images (the insets in the corresponding SEM images), and radial averages (Fig. 3c, f, i) of the top surface of the cAAO membranes, are demonstrated. The hexagonal pore arrangement is excellent for all samples, which is also reflected in the distinct FFT rings and narrow peaks in the radial average profiles. The high level of pore ordering was not observed before in the AAO obtained by a standard anodization in citric acid [8, 10, 11, 12], and can be attributed to a guided role of Al surface pre-patterned during the first anodization in etidronic acid electrolyte. In the guided anodization periodic arrangement of concavities on aluminum surface serves as nucleation sites for undisturbed growth of anodic alumina. The growth position of the pores is limited by the pre-patterned design and is restricted to the inner corner/electrolyte interface, where a maximum dissolution rate of Al3+ is localized [45]. Therefore, the geometrical features of Al concaves, such as hexagonal pore regularity and the pitch size, are directly transferred the corresponding AAO membranes. The interpore distance (D c ) and regularity parameter (R) determined for the cAAO membranes are given in Table 1. Within the margin of error, both parameters are comparable for the eAAO-1 and eAAO-2 membranes and the corresponding Al concaves. However, the R parameter for the sample cAAO-3 is evidently greater than the R determined for the Al conc-3, suggesting the improvement of the hexagonal pore arrangement after the multistep anodization in citric acid electrolyte. Moreover, because the pores are now densely arranged into hexagonal close-packed structure over relatively larger domains, the D c value has decreased as compared to the D c determined for the Al conc-3. The observation implies that the guided role of the nucleation sites on the Al surface was reinforced in this sample by the anodization conditions applied in the second anodization. The anodization was carried out in relatively high concentrated citric acid solution (20 wt%) and at relatively high temperature values (33–35 °C), which apparently provided additional forces in the pore reorganization process.

The cross sectional view of the cAAO membranes are shown in Fig. 4a–c. It is clearly seen that cAAO films with conical pore shape were successfully manufactured. The thickness of the cAAO films (the height of the cone) was around 2.4, 3.9, and 7.8 nm in the sample cAAO-1, cAAO-2, and cAAO-3, respectively.

Fig. 4

SEM images of cross sectional views of the tapered-pore cAAO-1 (a), cAAO-2 (b), and cAAO-3 (c) membranes

In Fig. 5, FTIR spectra of the cAAO membranes are shown along with the spectra of the eAAO-1 and the respective Al conc-1 samples. The FTIR spectrum of Al conc-1 sample is flat in the whole measured region, in contrast to the spectra of AAOs, where characteristic bands are clearly distinguishable. The broad dip centered at around 3400 cm−1 visible in all AAO membrane spectra is typical for valence vibrations of adsorbed water and OH groups [46, 47]. In the FTIR spectrum of the sample eAAO-1 prepared in etidronic acid (HEDP) two dips at 994 and 1172 cm−1 can be distinguished. Both dips are characteristic for phosphonates, which display bands due to the P–O stretching vibration in the 900–1200 cm−1 range [48, 49]. The dip at 994 cm−1 can be assigned the symmetric vibration of P–O chemical bond (νsP–O) of PO32− group, whereas the one at 1172 cm−1 corresponds most probably to the P=O vibrations. The IR spectra of the cAAO membranes synthesized during the multistep anodization in citric acid are completely different. Two distinct dips at 1472 and 1568 cm−1 appeared, which can be interpreted in terms of the internal frequencies of the citrate ion [47, 50, 51]. The bands can be ascribed to the symmetric (1472 cm−1) and antisymmetric (1568 cm−1) oscillations of the carboxylic ion (COO). The IR spectra of both eAAO and cAAO membranes indicate that the electrolyte species, such as phosphonate and citric ions, are being incorporated into the AAO framework under the high electric field. Moreover, the decrease of the reflectivity (increase in the magnitude of the absorbance) of the cAAO samples anodized under increasing anodizing potential suggests that with the electric field strength more ions are being attracted by the anode and embedded into the cAAO framework. The decrease of the reflectivity can be also caused by the increasing thickness of the cAAO-1, cAAO-2, and cAAO-3 membranes. The bands in the 400–1000 cm−1 range may be attributed to the bending and stretching vibrations of Al-O-Al of the alumina [52, 53]. The dips observed in the region between 519 and 595 cm−1 correspond most probably to the condensed octahedral stretching of the chemical bond Al–O6 [47, 54, 55], whereas well-defined dips between 927 and 938 cm−1 can be assigned to the longitudinal optical phonon (LO) stretching (λLO) of the Al-O chemical bond [56, 57]. The dip positions corresponding to the Al–O6 and λLO vibrations are different for cAAO-1 (546, 927 cm−1), cAAO-2 (519, 931 cm−1), and cAAO-3 (595, 938 cm−1) membranes, most probably owing to a somewhat different position the citric ions are attached to the Al-O structure and perhaps to a different amount of citric ions incorporated in the cAAO walls. Both effects will certainly affect the Al-O6 and the λLO vibration frequency. The decrease in reflective intensity of the dips assigned to Al-O6 and λLO bands with anodizing voltage corresponds with the reflectivity drop of the dips characteristic for COO- vibrations (the 1472 and 1568 cm−1 bands). Therefore, as before, the reflectivity decrease is tentatively attributed to the higher amount of citric ions being embedded into the AAO walls and the greater cAAO thickness (more citric ions that can absorb IR light). It was shown previously that the pores play a crucial role in the redshift of the longitudinal optical phonon (LO) mode [58]. Therefore, the band positions might be slightly different than those related to the non-porous alumina. Finally, the strong decrease of reflectivity above 4000 cm−1 (below 2.5 μm) is most probably due to the antireflective properties of the graded pore structure in the NIR spectral region. It can be seen that the eAAO-3 membrane with greatest D c and thickness values has the largest ability to trap light in this spectral range.

Fig. 5

IR spectra of the Al conc-1, eAAO-1, and the tapered-pore cAAO-1, cAAO-2, and cAAO-3 membranes

4 Conclusions

In this work, conical-pore AAO membranes with D c between around 530 and 620 nm and the thickness ranging between 2.4 and 7.8 μm, were fabricated. In the fabrication process a guided anodization was applied. Aluminum surface was first pre-patterned by the anodization in etidronic acid solution. Then, the Al concave arrays were used as nucleation sites to grow highly regular AAO in the second anodization. The second anodization was conducted in highly concentrated citric acid solution (20 wt%) and at relatively high temperature (33–35 °C). The pore shape was engineered during a multistep process alternating between anodization in the citric acid electrolyte and chemical pore broadening in phosphoric acid solution. The morphological analyses has revealed that the geometrical parameters of the Al concaves were successfully transferred to the cAAO membranes. FTIR spectra analysis confirmed that the electrolyte species, such as phosphonate and citric ions, are being incorporated into the AAO framework during the anodization. The graded-index AAO membranes can be used as a template for a production of antireflective coatings in a broad spectral range.

References

  1. 1.
    A. M. Md Jani, D. Losic, N.H. Voelcker, Progr. Mater. Sci. 58, 636 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. E. J. Poinern, N. Ali, D. Fawcett, Materials 4, 487 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.D. Sulka in Nanostructured Materials in Electrochemistry, ed. by A. Eftekhari (Wiley, Weinheim, 2008) p. 1Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Kikuchi, D. Nakajima, O. Nishinaga, S. Natsui, O.R. Suzuki, Curr. Nanosci. 11, 560 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Kikuchi, O. Nishinaga, S. Natsui, O.R. Suzuki, Electrochim. Acta 156, 235 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Takenaga, T. Kikuchi, S. Natsui, O.R. Suzuki, Electrochim. Acta 211, 515 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Mozalev, I. Mozaleva, M. Sakairi, H. Takahashi, Electrochim. Acta 50, 5065 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Bellemare, F. Sirois, D. Ménard, J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, E75 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Bellemare, L.-P. Carignan, F. Sirois, D. Ménard, J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, E47 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Katsuta, A. Yasumori, K. Wada, K. Kurashima, S. Suehara, S. Inoue, J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 354, 451 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Q. Wang, Y. Long, B. Sun, J. Porous Mater. 20, 785 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Chen, D. Yu, L. Cao, X. Zhu, Y. Song, H. Huang, L. Lu, X. Chen, Mater. Res. Bull. 57, 116 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Surawathanawises, X. Cheng, Electrochim. Acta 117, 498 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.M. Montero-Moreno, M. Waleczek, S. Martens, R. Zierold, D. Görlitz, V.V. Martίnez, V.M. Prida, K. Nielsch, Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1857 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Masuda, H. Yamada, M. Satoh, H. Asoh, M. Nakao, T. Tamamura, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2770 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Lee W, K. Nielsch, U. Gösele, Nanotechnology 18, 475713 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Liu, S. Liu, H. Zhou, C. Xie, Z. Xuang, C. Fu, Y. Kuang, Thin Solid Films 552, 75 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    X.Y. Han, W.Z. Shen, J. Electroanal. Chem. 655, 56 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Lee, K. Schwirn, M. Steinhart, E. Pippel, R. Scholz, U. Gösele, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 234 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Lee, J.C. Kim, Nanotechnology 21, 485304 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Li, C. Li, X. Gao, Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 10390 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Li, J. Li, C. Chen, J. Zhu, X. Gao, Chem. Commun. 48, 5100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Li, C. Li, C. Chen, Q. Hao, Z. Wang, J. Zhu, X. Gao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 5678 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Sun, J. Li, X. Jin, C. Zhou, Q. Hao, X. Gao, Electrochim. Acta 112, 327 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. H. Lee, X.Y. Lim, W. Kah, F. Romanato, C.C. Wong, J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 11, 1147 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Ferré-Borrul, J. Pallarés, G. Macías, L.F. Marsal, Materials 7, 5225 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Hubbard, M.E. Nasir, P. Shields, C.R. Bowen, A. Satka, K.P. Parsons, N.H. Holmes, D.W.E. Allsopp, Nanotechnology 23, 155302 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    H.K. Raut, S.S. Dinachali, Y.C. Loke, R. Ganesan, K.K. Ansah-Antwi, A. Góra, E.H. Khoo, V.A. Ganesh, M.S.M. Saifullah, S. Ramakrishna, ACS Nano 9, 1305 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Rahman, A. Ashraf, H. Xin, X. Tong, P. Sutter, M. D. Eisaman, C. T. Black, Nat. Comm. 6, 5963 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Asadollahbaik, S.A. Boden, M.D.B. Charlton, D.N.R. Payne, S. Cox, D.M. Bagnall, Opt. Express 22, A402 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Choi, S.H. Park, Y.M. Song, Y.T. Lee, C.K. Hwangbo, H. Yang, S.H. Lee, Adv. Mater. 22, 3713 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. Choi, S.H. Park, Y.M. Song, C. Choc, S.H. Lee, J. Mater. Chem. 22, 17037 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    F.L. Gonzalez, M.J. Gordon, Opt. Express 22, 12808 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Li, J. Zhu, X. Gao, Small 10, 2578 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    I. Horcas, R. Fernandez, J.M. Gomez-Rodriguez, J. Colchero, J. Gomez-Herrero, A.M. Baro, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 013705 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
    W. J. Stępniowski, D. Zasada, Z. Bojar, Surf. Coat. Technol. 206, 1416 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    W. J. Stępniowski, A. Nowak-Stępniowska, Z. Bojar, Mater. Charact. 78, 79 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Ono, M. Saito, H. Asoh, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 7, B21 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    S. Ono, M. Saito, M. Ishiguro, H. Asoh, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, B473 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    S.Z. Chu, K. Wada, S. Inoue, M. Isogai, Y. Katsuta, A. Yasumori, J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, B384 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K. Ebihara, H. Takahashi, M. Nagayama, J. Met. Finish. Soc. Jpn. 34, 548 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    J.P. O’Sullivan, G.C. Wood, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 317, 511 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    W. J. Stępniowski, Z. Bojar, Surf. Coat. Technol. 206, 265 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    S.H. Chen, D.-S. Chan, C.-K. Chen, T.-H. Chang, Y.-H. Lai, C.-C. Lee, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys 49, 015201 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Y.J.O. Asencios, M.R. Sun-Kou, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 10002 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    I.V. Gasenkova, E.V. Ostapenko, N.I. Mazurenko, J. Surf. Invest. 8, 636 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    M.C. Zenobi, C.V. Luengo, M.J. Avena, E.H. Rueda, Spectrochimica Acta Part A 70, 270 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    W. Gong, Int. J. Miner. Process. 63, 147 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    B. R. Lakshmanan, J. Ind. Inst. Sci. 39, 27 (1957).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    J. C. Mohan, G. Praveen, K. P. Chennazhi, R. Jayakumarand, S.V. Nair, J. Exp. Nanosci. 8, 32 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Y. Yang, Q. Gao, Phys. Lett. A 333, 328 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    I.F. Myronyuk, V.I. Mandzyuk, V.M. Sachko, V.M. Gun’ko, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11, 153 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    P. Tarte, Spectrochim. Acta 23A, 2127 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    F. Fondeur, J.L. Koenig, J. Adhes. 40, 189 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    J.M. Reyes, B.M. Perez Ramos, C.Z. Islas, W.C. Arriaga, P.R. Quintero, A.T. Jacome, J. Electrochem. Soc 160, B201 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    L.T. Jurado, R.M.A. Hernández, E. Rocha-Rangel, J. Powder Technol. 268070, 7 (2013)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    E. Wackelgard, J. Phys. 8, 4289 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Advanced Materials and Technologies, Faculty of Advanced Technologies and ChemistryMilitary University of TechnologyWarszawaPoland
  2. 2.Institute of OptoelectronicsMilitary University of TechnologyWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations