Glucoamylase immobilized on montmorillonite: influence of nature of binding on surface properties of clay-support and activity of enzyme
- 139 Downloads
- 12 Citations
Abstract
Glucoamylase was immobilized on acid activated montmorillonite clay via two different procedures namely adsorption and covalent binding. The immobilized enzymes were characterized by XRD, NMR and N2 adsorption measurements and the activity of immobilized glucoamylase for starch hydrolysis was determined in a batch reactor. XRD shows intercalation of enzyme into the clay matrix during both immobilization procedures. Intercalation occurs via the side chains of the amino acid residues, the entire polypeptide backbone being situated at the periphery of the clay matrix. 27Al NMR studies revealed the different nature of interaction of enzyme with the support for both immobilization techniques. N2 adsorption measurements indicated a sharp drop in surface area and pore volume for the covalently bound glucoamylase that suggested severe pore blockage. Activity studies were performed in a batch reactor. The adsorbed and covalently bound glucoamylase retained 49% and 66% activity of the free enzyme respectively. They showed enhanced pH and thermal stabilities. The immobilized enzymes also followed Michaelis–Menten kinetics. K m was greater than the free enzyme that was attributed to an effect of immobilization. The immobilized preparations demonstrated increased reusability as well as storage stability.
Keywords
Immobilization Glucoamylase Adsorption Covalent binding MontmorillonitePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank SIF IISc Bangalore for the NMR experiments. Financial support from CSIR New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- 1.Y.-H. Ju, W.-J. Chen, C.-K. Lee, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 17, 685 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.J. Bryjak, Biochem. Eng. J. 16, 347 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.V. Shanker, P.N. Nehete, R.M. Kothari, Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 30, 62 (1993)Google Scholar
- 4.G.A. Kovalenko, O.V. Komova, A.V. Simakov, V.V. Khomov, N.A. Rudina, J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 182–183, 73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.J.-I. Ida, T. Matsuyama, H. Yamamoto, Biochem. Eng. J. 5, 179 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.M.Y. Arica, N.G. Alaeddinoglu, V. Hasirci, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 22, 152 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.J.-T. Oh, J.-T. Kim, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 27, 356 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.T. Bahar, S.S. Celebi, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 23, 301 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.P. Laszlo, Science 23, 235 (1987)Google Scholar
- 10.T.J. Pinnavia, Science 220, 365 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.M.L. Occelli, A. Aurox, G.J. Ray, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 39, 43 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.I. Palinko, A. Molnar, J.B. Nagy, J.C. Bertnand, K. Lazar, J. Valyon, I. Kiricsi, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 938, 1591 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.D. Plee, F. Borg, L. Gatineau, J.J. Fripiat, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 2362 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.O.H. Lowry, N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Faar, R.J.J. Randall, J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265 (1951)Google Scholar
- 15.H.M. Mody, K.H. Mody, O.P. Mairh, R.V. Jasra, Indian J. Chem. 38A, 1200 (1999)Google Scholar
- 16.W. Jia, E. Segal, D. Kornemandel, Y. Lamhot, M. Narkis, A. Siegmann, Synth. Met. 128, 115 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.B.H. Kim, J.H. Jung, S.H. Hong, J.W. Kim, H.J. Choi, J. Joo, Curr. Appl. Phys. 1, 112 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.R.D. Gougeon, M. Soulard, M. Reinholdt, J. Miehe-Brendle, R. Chezeau, R. LeDred, R. Marchal, P. Jeandet, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1366 (2003)Google Scholar
- 19.S.E. Ashbrook, J. Mcmanus, K.J.D. Mackenzie, S. Wimperis, J. Phys. Chem. 104, 6408 (2000)Google Scholar
- 20.R. Jelinek, B.F. Chmelka, A. Stein, G.A. Ozin, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6744 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Q. Liu, D.A. Spears, Q. Liu, Appl. Clay Sci. 19, 89 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.S.P. O’neill, P. Dunnill, M.D. Lilly, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 13, 337 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.A. Tanriseven, Y.B. Uludag, S. Dogan, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 30, 406 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.E. Cepeda, M. Hermosa, A. Ballesteros, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 76, 69 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.P.N. Nehete, M.V. Hegde, L.G. Reddy, V. Shanker, Biotechnol. Lett. 9, 651 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.D.D. Lee, G.K. Lee, P.J. Reilly, Y.Y. Lee, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22, 1 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.J.M.S. Cabral, J.M. Novais, J.P. Cardoso, J.F. Kennedy, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 36, 247 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.M.J. Bachler, G.W. Standberg, K.L. Smiley, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 12, 85 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.D.A. Sirotti, A.H. Emery, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 9, 27 (1984)Google Scholar
- 30.Z. Sasvari, B. Asboth, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 63, 459 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Z. Hui, K. Wei, C. Xiao, L. Wei, S. Jiacong, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 54, 43 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.A.S. Rani, M.L.M. Das, S. Satyanarayana, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 10, 471 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Y. Ge, Y. Wang, H. Zhou, S. Wang, Y. Tong, W. Li, J. Biotechnol. 67, 33 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.V. Stefuca, I. Cipakova, P. Gemeiner, Thermochim. Acta 378, 79 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.S. Gopinath, S. Sugunan, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 83, 79 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.G. Sanjay, S. Sugunan, Catal. Commun. 6, 81 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar