Journal of Porous Materials

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 127–136 | Cite as

Glucoamylase immobilized on montmorillonite: influence of nature of binding on surface properties of clay-support and activity of enzyme

Article

Abstract

Glucoamylase was immobilized on acid activated montmorillonite clay via two different procedures namely adsorption and covalent binding. The immobilized enzymes were characterized by XRD, NMR and N2 adsorption measurements and the activity of immobilized glucoamylase for starch hydrolysis was determined in a batch reactor. XRD shows intercalation of enzyme into the clay matrix during both immobilization procedures. Intercalation occurs via the side chains of the amino acid residues, the entire polypeptide backbone being situated at the periphery of the clay matrix. 27Al NMR studies revealed the different nature of interaction of enzyme with the support for both immobilization techniques. N2 adsorption measurements indicated a sharp drop in surface area and pore volume for the covalently bound glucoamylase that suggested severe pore blockage. Activity studies were performed in a batch reactor. The adsorbed and covalently bound glucoamylase retained 49% and 66% activity of the free enzyme respectively. They showed enhanced pH and thermal stabilities. The immobilized enzymes also followed Michaelis–Menten kinetics. K m was greater than the free enzyme that was attributed to an effect of immobilization. The immobilized preparations demonstrated increased reusability as well as storage stability.

Keywords

Immobilization Glucoamylase Adsorption Covalent binding Montmorillonite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank SIF IISc Bangalore for the NMR experiments. Financial support from CSIR New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Y.-H. Ju, W.-J. Chen, C.-K. Lee, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 17, 685 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Bryjak, Biochem. Eng. J. 16, 347 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Shanker, P.N. Nehete, R.M. Kothari, Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 30, 62 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.A. Kovalenko, O.V. Komova, A.V. Simakov, V.V. Khomov, N.A. Rudina, J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 182–183, 73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.-I. Ida, T. Matsuyama, H. Yamamoto, Biochem. Eng. J. 5, 179 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.Y. Arica, N.G. Alaeddinoglu, V. Hasirci, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 22, 152 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.-T. Oh, J.-T. Kim, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 27, 356 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Bahar, S.S. Celebi, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 23, 301 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Laszlo, Science 23, 235 (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.J. Pinnavia, Science 220, 365 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.L. Occelli, A. Aurox, G.J. Ray, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 39, 43 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Palinko, A. Molnar, J.B. Nagy, J.C. Bertnand, K. Lazar, J. Valyon, I. Kiricsi, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 938, 1591 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Plee, F. Borg, L. Gatineau, J.J. Fripiat, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 2362 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O.H. Lowry, N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Faar, R.J.J. Randall, J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265 (1951)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.M. Mody, K.H. Mody, O.P. Mairh, R.V. Jasra, Indian J. Chem. 38A, 1200 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Jia, E. Segal, D. Kornemandel, Y. Lamhot, M. Narkis, A. Siegmann, Synth. Met. 128, 115 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B.H. Kim, J.H. Jung, S.H. Hong, J.W. Kim, H.J. Choi, J. Joo, Curr. Appl. Phys. 1, 112 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.D. Gougeon, M. Soulard, M. Reinholdt, J. Miehe-Brendle, R. Chezeau, R. LeDred, R. Marchal, P. Jeandet, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1366 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.E. Ashbrook, J. Mcmanus, K.J.D. Mackenzie, S. Wimperis, J. Phys. Chem. 104, 6408 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Jelinek, B.F. Chmelka, A. Stein, G.A. Ozin, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6744 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Q. Liu, D.A. Spears, Q. Liu, Appl. Clay Sci. 19, 89 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S.P. O’neill, P. Dunnill, M.D. Lilly, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 13, 337 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Tanriseven, Y.B. Uludag, S. Dogan, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 30, 406 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Cepeda, M. Hermosa, A. Ballesteros, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 76, 69 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    P.N. Nehete, M.V. Hegde, L.G. Reddy, V. Shanker, Biotechnol. Lett. 9, 651 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D.D. Lee, G.K. Lee, P.J. Reilly, Y.Y. Lee, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22, 1 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.M.S. Cabral, J.M. Novais, J.P. Cardoso, J.F. Kennedy, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 36, 247 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M.J. Bachler, G.W. Standberg, K.L. Smiley, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 12, 85 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.A. Sirotti, A.H. Emery, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 9, 27 (1984)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Z. Sasvari, B. Asboth, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 63, 459 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Z. Hui, K. Wei, C. Xiao, L. Wei, S. Jiacong, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 54, 43 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    A.S. Rani, M.L.M. Das, S. Satyanarayana, J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 10, 471 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y. Ge, Y. Wang, H. Zhou, S. Wang, Y. Tong, W. Li, J. Biotechnol. 67, 33 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    V. Stefuca, I. Cipakova, P. Gemeiner, Thermochim. Acta 378, 79 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. Gopinath, S. Sugunan, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 83, 79 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. Sanjay, S. Sugunan, Catal. Commun. 6, 81 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied ChemistryCochin University of Science & TechnologyKochiIndia

Personalised recommendations