Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 479–495 | Cite as

To what extent is the DNA of microbial eukaryotes modified during burying into lake sediments? A repeat-coring approach on annually laminated sediments

  • Eric Capo
  • Isabelle Domaizon
  • Dominique Maier
  • Didier Debroas
  • Christian Bigler
Original paper


Paleogenetics provides a powerful framework to reconstruct the long-term temporal dynamics of various biological groups from aquatic sediments. However, validations are still required to ensure the authenticity of the molecular signal obtained from sedimentary DNA. Here, we investigated the effects of early diagenesis on the DNA signal from micro-eukaryotes preserved in sediments by comparing metabarcoding inventories obtained for two sediment cores sampled in 2007 and 2013 respectively. High-throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) of sedimentary DNA was utilized to reconstruct the composition of microbial eukaryotic communities by targeting the V7 region of the 18S rDNA gene. No significant difference was detected between the molecular inventories obtained for the two cores both for total richness and diversity indices. Moreover, community structures obtained for the two cores were congruent as revealed by procrustean analysis. Though most of the eukaryotic groups showed no significant difference in terms of richness and relative proportion according to the core, the group of fungi was found to differ both in terms of richness and relative proportion (possibly due to their spatial heterogeneity and potential activity in sediments). Considering the OTUs level (i.e. Operational Taxonomic Units as a proxy of ecological species), our results showed that, for the older analyzed strata (age: 15–40 years), the composition and structure of communities were very similar for the two cores (except for fungi) and the DNA signal was considered stable. However, for the uppermost strata (age < 15 years), changes of moderate magnitude were detected in the relative abundance of few OTUs. Overall, this study points out that, in Nylandssjön sediments, early diagenesis did not induce marked modifications in the micro-eukaryotic DNA signal, thus opening new perspectives based on the analysis of eukaryotic sedimentary DNA to address scientific issues both in the domains of paleolimnology and microbial ecology. Because this study site is ideal for DNA preservation in sediment (quick sedimentation processes, no sediment resuspension, anoxic conditions at sediment–water interface), the generalization of our conclusions, in particular for less favorable sites, must be considered cautiously.


eDNA Paleogenetics Sediment Metabarcoding Plankton 



Funding for this project was provided by a grant from la Région Rhône-Alpes. We thank the Région Rhône-Alpes for the financial support of the Ph.D. thesis of E Capo through the “ARC Environnement” scheme. We thank the EC2CO INSU program (France) who supported the program “REPLAY”.

Supplementary material

10933_2017_5_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (38 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 37 kb)
10933_2017_5_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (48 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 47 kb)
10933_2017_5_MOESM3_ESM.pptx (135 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PPTX 135 kb)
10933_2017_5_MOESM4_ESM.pptx (124 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PPTX 123 kb)
10933_2017_5_MOESM5_ESM.pptx (553 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PPTX 552 kb)


  1. Behrensmeyer AK, Kidwell SM, Gastaldo RA (2000) Taphonomy and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26:103–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkeley A, Perry CT, Smithers SG, Horton BP, Taylor KG (2007) A review of the ecological and taphonomic controls on foraminiferal assemblage development in intertidal environments. Earth Sci Rev 83:205–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boere AC, Rijpstra WIC, De Lange GJ, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Coolen MJL (2011a) Preservation potential of ancient plankton DNA in Pleistocene marine sediments. Geobiology 9:377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boere AC, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Rijpstra WIC, Volkman JK, Coolen MJL (2011b) Source-specific variability in post-depositional DNA preservation with potential implications for DNA based paleoecological records. Org Geochem 42:1216–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs AW, Stenzel U, Johnson PL, Green RE, Kelso J, Prüfer K, Meyer M, Krause J, Ronan MT, Lachmann M, Pääbo S (2007) Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14616–14621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capo E, Debroas D, Arnaud F, Domaizon I (2015) Is Planktonic diversity well recorded in sedimentary DNA? Toward the reconstruction of past protistan diversity. Microb Ecol 70:865–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capo E, Debroas D, Arnaud F, Guillemot T, Bichet V, Millet L, Gauthier E, Massa C, Develle AL, Pignol C, Lejzerowicz F, Domaizon I (2016) Long-term dynamics in microbial eukaryotes communities: a paleolimnological view based on sedimentary DNA. Mol Ecol 25:5925–59432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capo E, Debroas D, Arnaud F, Perga M-E, Chardon C, Domaizon I (2017) Tracking a century of changes in microbial eukaryotic diversity in lakes driven by nutrient enrichment and climate warming. Environ Microbiol 19:2873–2892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caron DA, Hutchins DA (2013) The effects of changing climate on microzooplankton grazing and community structure: drivers, predictions and knowledge gaps. J Plankton Res 35:235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambouvet A, Berney C, Romac S, Audic S, Maguire F, De Vargas C, Richards TA (2014) Diverse molecular signatures for ribosomally “active” Perkinsea in marine sediments. BMC Microbiol 14:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coolen MJL, Gibson JAE (2009) Ancient DNA in lake sediment records. PAGES News 17:104–106Google Scholar
  12. Coolen MJL, Shtereva G (2009) Vertical distribution of metabolically active eukaryotes in the water column and sediments of the Black Sea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70:525–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coolen MJL, Orsi WD, Balkema C, Quince C, Harris K, Sylva SP, Filipova-Marinova M, Giosan L (2013) Evolution of the plankton paleome in the Black Sea from the Deglacial to Anthropocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:8609–8614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corinaldesi C, Danovaro R, Dell’Anno A (2005) Simultaneous recovery of extracellular and intracellular DNA suitable for molecular studies from marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corinaldesi C, Beolchini F, Dell’Anno A (2008) Damage and degradation rates of extracellular DNA in marine sediments: implications for the preservation of gene sequences. Mol Ecol 17:3939–3951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dell’Anno A, Corinaldesi C (2004) Degradation and turnover of extracellular DNA in marine sediments: ecological and methodological considerations degradation and turnover of extracellular dna in marine sediments—ecological and methodological considerations. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4384–4386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dell’Anno A, Bompadre S, Danovaro R (2002) Quantification, base composition, and fate of extracellular DNA in marine sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 47:899–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Domaizon I, Savichtcheva O, Debroas D, Arnaud F, Villar C, Pignol C, Alric B, Perga ME (2013) DNA from lake sediments reveals the long-term dynamics and diversity of Synechococcus assemblages. Biogeosciences 10:2515–2564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Domaizon I, Winegardner A, Capo E, Gauthier J, Gregory-Eaves I (2017) DNA-based methods in paleolimnology: new opportunities for investigating long-term dynamics of lacustrine biodiversity. J Paleolimnol 58:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edgcomb VP, Beaudoin D, Gast R, Biddle JF, Teske A (2011) Marine subsurface eukaryotes: the fungal majority. Environ Microbiol 13:172–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epp LS, Gussarova G, Boessenkool S, Olsen J, Haile J, Schrøder-Nielsen A, Ludikova A, Hassel K, Stenøien HK, Funder S, Willerslev E, Kjær K, Brochmann C (2015) Lake sediment multi-taxon DNA from North Greenland records early post-glacial appearance of vascular plants and accurately tracks environmental changes. Quat Sci Rev 117:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Epp LS, Stoof-Leichsenring KR, Trauth MH, Tiedemann R (2011) Molecular profiling of diatom assemblages in tropical lake sediments using taxon-specific PCR and Denaturing High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (PCR–DHPLC). Mol Ecol Resour 11:842–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esling P, Lejzerowicz F, Pawlowski J (2015) Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 43:2513–2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gälman V, Petterson G, Renberg I (2006) A comparison of sediment varves (1950–2003 AD) in two adjacent lakes in Northern Sweden. J Paleolimnol 35:837–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gälman V, Rydberg J, De-Luna SS, Bindler R, Renberg I (2008) Carbon and nitrogen loss rates during aging of lake sediment: changes over 27 years studied in varved lake sediment. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1076–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gälman V, Rydberg J, Bigler C (2009a) Decadal diagenetic effects on δ13C and δ15N studied in varved lake sediment. Limnol Oceanogr 54:917–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gälman V, Rydberg J, Shchukarev A, Sjöberg S, Martínez-Cortizas A, Bindler R, Renberg I (2009b) The role of iron and sulfur in the visual appearance of lake sediment varves. J Paleolimnol 42:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gast RJ, Dennett MR, Caron DA (2004) Characterization of protistan assemblages in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2028–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilbert MTP, Binladen J, Miller W, Wiuf C, Willerslev E, Poinar H, Carlson JE, Leebens-Mack JH, Schuster SC (2007) Recharacterization of ancient DNA miscoding lesions: insights in the era of sequencing-by-synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 35:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hagelberg E, Hofreiter M, Keyser C (2015) Ancient DNA: the first three decades. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 4:9Google Scholar
  33. Haile J, Holdaway R, Oliver K, Bunce M, Gilbert MTP, Nielsen R, Munch K, Ho SYW, Shapiro B, Willerslev E (2007) Ancient DNA chronology within sediment deposits: are paleobiological reconstructions possible and is DNA leaching a factor? Mol Biol Evol 24:982–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9Google Scholar
  35. Hebsgaard MB, Phillips MJ, Willerslev E (2005) Geologically ancient DNA: fact or artefact? Trends Microbiol 13:212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hou W, Dong H, Li G, Yang J, Coolen MJL, Liu X, Wang S, Jiang H, Wu X, Xiao H, Lian B, Wan Y (2014) Identification of photosynthetic plankton communities using sedimentary ancient DNA and their response to late-holocene climate change on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci Rep 4:6648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson DA, Harvey HH (1993) Fish and benthic invertebrates: community concordance and community-environment relationships. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2641–2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones EBG, Hyde KD, Pang KL (2014) Freshwater fungi and fungal-like organisms. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, p 496Google Scholar
  39. Kirkpatrick JB, Walsh EA, D’Hondt S (2016) Fossil DNA persistence and decay in marine sediment over hundred-thousand-year to million-year time scales. Geology G37933:1Google Scholar
  40. Kristensen E (2000) Organic matter diagenesis at the oxic/anoxic interface in coastal marine sediments, with emphasis on the role of burrowing animals. Hydrobiologia 426:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kyle M, Haande S, Ostermaier V, Rohrlack T (2015a) The red queen race between parasitic chytrids and their host, Planktothrix: a test using a time series reconstructed from sediment DNA. PLoS ONE 10:e0118738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kyle M, Haande S, Sønstebø J, Rohrlack T (2015b) Amplification of DNA in sediment cores to detect historic Planktothrix occurrence in three Norwegian lakes. J Paleolimnol 53:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lefranc M, Thénot A, Lepère C, Debroas D (2005) Genetic diversity of small eukaryotes in lakes differing by their trophic status. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5935–5942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lehmann MF, Bernasconi SM, Barbieri A, McKenzie JA (2002) Preservation of organic matter and alteration of its carbon and nitrogen isotope composition during simulated and in situ early sedimentary diagenesis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66:3573–3584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lentendu G, Wubet T, Chatzinotas A, Wilhelm C, Buscot F, Schlegel M (2014) Effects of long-term differential fertilization on eukaryotic microbial communities in an arable soil: a multiple barcoding approach. Mol Ecol 23:3341–3355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lepère C, Boucher D, Jardillier L, Domaizon I, Debroas D (2006) Succession and regulation factors of small eukaryote community composition in a lacustrine ecosystem (Lake Pavin). Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2971–2981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lepère C, Domaizon I, Debroas D (2008) Unexpected importance of potential parasites in the composition of the freshwater small-eukaryote community. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2940–2949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lever MA, Torti A, Eickenbusch P, Michaud AB, Šantl-Temkiv T, Jørgensen BB (2015) A modular method for the extraction of DNA and RNA, and the separation of DNA pools from diverse environmental sample types. Front Microbiol 6:476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lima-Mendez G, Faust K, Henry N, Decelle J, Colin S, Carcillo F, Chaffron S, Ignacio-Espinosa JC, Roux S, Vincent F, Bittner L, Darzi Y, Wang J, Audic S, Berline L, Bontempi G, Cabello AM, Coppola L, Cornejo-Castillo FM, d’Ovidio F, De Meester L, Ferrera I, Garet-Delmas MJ, Guidi L, Lara E, Pesant S, Royo-Llonch M, Salazar G, Sánchez P, Sebastian M, Souffreau C, Dimier C, Picheral M, Searson S, Kandels-Lewis S, Gorsky G, Not F, Ogata H, Speich S, Stemmann L, Weissenbach J, Wincker P, Acinas SG, Sunagawa S, Bork P, Sullivan MB, Karsenti E, Bowler C, de Vargas C, Raes J (2015) Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science 348:1262073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maier DB, Rydberg J, Bigler C, Renberg I (2013) Compaction of recent varved lake sediments. GFF 135:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mangot J-F, Domaizon I, Taib N, Marouni N, Duffaud E, Bronner G, Debroas D (2013) Short-term dynamics of diversity patterns: evidence of continual reassembly within lacustrine small eukaryotes. Environ Microbiol 15:1745–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oksanen AJ, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, Hara RBO, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2015) Package “vegan.”
  53. Orsi WD, Biddle JF, Edgcomb VP (2013) Deep sequencing of subseafloor eukaryotic rRNA reveals active Fungi across marine subsurface provinces. PLoS ONE 8:e56335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peres-Neto P, Jackson D (2001) How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2007) SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35:7188–7196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Randlett M-È, Coolen MJL, Stockhecke M, Pickarski N, Litt T, Balkema C, Kwiecien O, Tomonaga Y, Wehrli B, Schubert CJ (2014) Alkenone distribution in Lake Van sediment over the last 270 ka: influence of temperature and haptophyte species composition. Quat Sci Rev 104:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Renberg I (1981) Improved methods for sampling, photographing and varve-counting of varved lake sediments. Boreas 10:255–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Renberg I (1986) Photographic demonstration of the annual nature of a varve type common in N. Swedish lake sediments. Hydrobiologia 140:93–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rizzi E, Lari M, Gigli E, De Bellis G, Caramelli D (2012) Ancient DNA studies: new perspectives on old samples. Genet Sel Evol 44:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rydberg J, Martinez-Cortizas A (2014) Geochemical assessment of an annually laminated lake sediment record from northern Sweden: a multi-core, multi-element approach. J Paleolimnol 51:499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rydberg J, Gälman V, Renberg I, Bindler R, Lambertsson L, Martínez-Cortizas A (2008) Assessing the stability of mercury and methylmercury in a varved lake sediment deposit. Environ Sci Technol 42:4391–4396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Savichtcheva O, Debroas D, Perga M-EE, Arnaud F, Villar C, Lyautey E, Kirkham A, Chardon C, Alric B, Domaizon I (2015) Effects of nutrients and warming on Planktothrix dynamics and diversity: a palaeolimnological view based on sedimentary DNA and RNA. Freshw Biol 60:31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scupham AJ, Presley LL, Wei B, Bent E, Griffith N, McPherson M, Zhu F, Oluwadara O, Rao N, Braun J, Borneman J (2006) Abundant and diverse fungal microbiota in the murine intestine. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:793–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shokralla S, Spall JL, Gibson JF, Hajubabaei M (2012) Next-generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research. Mol Ecol 21:1794–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sjögren P, Edwards ME, Gielly L, Langdon CT, Croudace IW, Merkel MKF, Fonville T, Alsos IG (2017) Lake sedimentary DNA accurately records 20th century introductions of exotic conifers in Scotland. New Phytol 213:929–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sparrow F (2013) Ecology of freshwater fungi. In: Ainsworth G, Sussman A (eds) The fungi, an advanced treatise. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–93Google Scholar
  67. Stoof-Leichsenring KR, Epp LS, Trauth MH, Tiedemann R (2012) Hidden diversity in diatoms of Kenyan Lake Naivasha: a genetic approach detects temporal variation. Mol Ecol 21:1918–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stoof-Leichsenring KR, Herzschuh U, Pestryakova L, Klemm J, Epp LS, Tiedemann R (2015) Genetic data from algae sedimentary DNA reflect the influence of environment over geography. Sci Rep 5:12924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH (2012) Environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 21:1789–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Torti A, Alexander M, Barker B (2015) Marine Genomics Origin, dynamics, and implications of extracellular DNA pools in marine sediments. Mar Genom 24:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van de Peer Y, De Rijk P, Wuyts J, Winkelmans T, De Wachter R (2000) The European small subunit ribosomal RNA database. Nucleic Acids Res 28:175–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vick-Majors TJ, Priscu JC, Amaral-Zettler LA (2014) Modular community structure suggests metabolic plasticity during the transition to polar night in ice-covered Antarctic lakes. ISME J 8:778–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vuillemin A, Ariztegui D, Leavitt PR (2015) Recording of climate and diagenesis through fossil pigments and sedimentary DNA at Laguna Potrok Aike, Argentina. Biogeosci Discuss 12:18345–18388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Willerslev E, Cooper A (2005) Ancient DNA. Proc R Soc B 272:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wurzbacher C, Bärlocher F, Grossart H (2010) Fungi in lake ecosystems. Aquat Microb Ecol 59:125–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang H, Huang T, Chen S (2015) Ignored sediment fungal populations in water supply reservoirs are revealed by quantitative PCR and 454 pyrosequencing. BMC Microbiol 15:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CARRTEL, INRA, Université de Savoie Mont BlancThonon-Les-BainsFrance
  2. 2.CARRTEL, INRA, Université de Savoie Mont BlancThonon-Les-BainsFrance
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  4. 4.Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, LMGEClermont-FerrandFrance
  5. 5.CNRS, UMR 6023, LMGEAubièreFrance

Personalised recommendations