Why Future Earth needs lake sediment studies
The new Future Earth Framework and International Council of Science Grand Challenges highlight the need to combine environmental and complexity sciences. An improved understanding of trajectories, interactions, fast and slow processes, alternate steady states and thresholds in key natural and social phenomena are vital to the design of sustainable management strategies. Lake sediment records can provide highly resolved time-series of data that give essential long term perspectives for complex socio-ecological systems, especially at regional scales. This means that these records have important roles in addressing the Future Earth agenda, especially for Forecasting, Observing and Confining environmental change within the proposed interdisciplinary themes of Dynamic Planet and Global Development.
KeywordsSustainability Complex socio-ecological systems Lake sediments
It is a great pleasure to contribute a paper to this Special Issue. Since the 1970s, Rick has been an ever supportive and inspirational friend and colleague. I acknowledge financial support from the Programme Framework Grant ‘Poverty and ecology: developing a new evolutionary approach’ (NERC project no. NE/I002960/1), funded by the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation Programme (ESPA). The ESPA programme is funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). This is a Sustainability Science at Southampton publication.
- Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1305–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crook DS, Chiverrell RC, Dearing JA, Jones RT, Welsh KE (2011) Spatial and temporal controls on hydro-geomorphic processes in the French Prealps. In: Dearing J, Dotterweich M, Foster T, Newman L, von Gunten L (eds) Integrative paleoscience for sustainable management. Pages News 19(2):47–49Google Scholar
- Dearing JA, Braimoh AK, Reenberg A, Turner BL, van der Leeuw S et al (2010) Complex land systems: the need for long time perspectives to assess their future. Ecol Soc 15:21. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art21/ Google Scholar
- ICSU (2011) ICSU strategic plan II, 2012–2017. International Council for Science, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Landres P, Morgan P, Swanson F (1999) Overview of the use of natural variability in managing ecological systems. Ecol Appl 9:1279–1288Google Scholar
- MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis. http://www.maweb.org/en/Synthesis.aspx
- Raworth K (2012) A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam Discussion Papers, Oxford. http://policypractice.oxfam.org.uk/publications
- Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- UK NEA (2011) The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report. UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar