Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 45–66 | Cite as

Challenges in using siliceous subfossils as a tool for inferring past water level and hydroperiod in Everglades marshes

  • Christopher Sanchez
  • Evelyn E. Gaiser
  • Colin J. Saunders
  • Anna H. Wachnicka
  • Nicholas Oehm
  • Christopher Craft
Original paper

Abstract

Successfully rehabilitating drained wetlands through hydrologic restoration is dependent on defining restoration targets, a process that is informed by pre-drainage conditions, as well as understanding linkages between hydrology and ecosystem structure. Paleoecological records can inform restoration goals by revealing long-term patterns of change, but are dependent on preservation of biomarkers that provide meaningful interpretations of environmental change. In the Florida Everglades, paleohydrological hind-casting could improve restoration forecasting, but frequent drying of marsh soils leads to poor preservation of many biomarkers. To determine the effectiveness of employing siliceous subfossils in paleohydrological reconstructions, we examined diatoms, plant and sponge silico-sclerids from three soil cores in the central Everglades marshes. Subfossil quality varied among cores, but the abundance of recognizable specimens was sufficient to infer 1,000–3,000 years of hydrologic change at decadal to centennial resolution. Phytolith morphotypes were linked to key marsh plant species to indirectly measure fluctuations in water depth. A modern dataset was used to derive diatom-based inferences of water depth and hydroperiod (R2 = 0.63, 0.47; RMSE = 14 cm, 120 days, respectively). Changes in subfossil quality and abundances at centennial time-scales were associated with mid-Holocene climate events including the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period, while decadal-scale fluctuations in assemblage structure during the twentieth century suggested co-regulation of hydrology by cyclical climate drivers (particularly the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation) and water management changes. The successful reconstructions based on siliceous subfossils shown here at a coarse temporal scale (i.e., decadal to centennial) advocate for their application in more highly resolved (i.e., subdecadal) records, which should improve the ability of water managers to target the quantity and variability of water flows appropriate for hydrologic restoration.

Keywords

Everglades Paleoecology Phytoliths Diatoms Hydrology Sponges Calibration 

Supplementary material

10933_2012_9624_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1260 kb)

References

  1. Anderson W, Gaiser EE (2012) Understanding paleoenvironmental change in Everglades wetlands. J Paleolimnol (Submitted)Google Scholar
  2. Barker P, Fontes J-C, Gasse F, Druart J-C (1994) Experimental dissolution of diatom silica in concentrated salt solutions and implications for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Limnol Oceanogr 39:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckage B, Platt WJ, Slocum MG, Panko B (2003) Influence of the El Niño Southern Oscillation on fire regimes in the Florida Everglades. Ecology 84:3124–3130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernhardt CE, Willard DA (2009) Response of the Everglades ridge and slough landscape to climate variability and 20th-century water management. Ecol Appl 19:1723–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birks HJB (1995) Quantitative paleoenvironmetal reconstructions. In: Maddy D, Brew JS (eds) Statistical modeling of quaternary science data, vol 5. Quaternary Research Association, Cambridge, pp 161–236Google Scholar
  6. Childers DL, Doren RF, Jones R, Noe GB, Rugge M, Scinto LJ (2003) Decadal change in vegetation and soil phosphorus pattern across the Everglades landscape. J Environ Qual 32:344–362Google Scholar
  7. Childers DL, Iwaniec D, Rondeau D, Rubio G, Verdon E, Madden CJ (2006) Responses of sawgrass and spikerush to variation in hydrologic drivers and salinity in southern Everglades marshes. Hydrobiologia 569:273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chmura GL, Stone PA, Ross MS (2006) Non-pollen subfossils in Everglades sediments. Rev Paleobot Palynol 141:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper SR, Huvane J, Vaithiyanathan P, Richardson CJ (1999) Calibration of diatoms along a nutrient gradient in Florida Everglades Water Conservation Area-2A, USA. J Paleolimnol 22:413–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper S, Gaiser E, Wachnicka A (2010) Estuarine paleoecological reconstructions using diatoms. In: Smol JP, Stoermer EF (eds) The diatoms: applications in environmental and earth sciences, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Donders TH, Wagner F, Dilcher D, Visscher H (2005a) Mid- to late-Holocene El Niño Southern Oscillation dynamics reflected in the subtropical terrestrial realm. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:10904–10908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donders TH, Wagnder F, Visscher H (2005b) Quantification strategies for human-induced and natural hydrological changes in wetland vegetation, southern Florida, USA. Quat Res 63:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duever MJ, Meeder JF, Meeder LC, McCollom JM (1994) The climate of South Florida and its role in shaping the Everglades ecosystem. In: Ogden JC, Davis SM (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucy Press, Delray Beach, pp 225–248Google Scholar
  14. Duff K, Zeeb B, Smol J (1997) Chrysophyte cyst biogeographical and ecological distributions: a synthesis. J Biogeogr 24:791–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enfield DB, Mestas-Nuñez AM, Trimble PJ (2001) The Atlantic multidecadal oscillation and its relation to rainfall and river flows in the continental U.S. Geophys Res Lett 28:2077–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fennema RJ, Neidrauer CJ, Johnson RA, MacVicar TK, Perkins WA (1994) A computer model to simulate natural Everglades hydrology. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 249–289Google Scholar
  17. Frost TM (1991) Porifera. In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 5–124Google Scholar
  18. Gaiser EE (2009) Periphyton as an indicator of restoration in the Everglades. Ecol Indic 9:S37–S45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaiser EE, Taylor BE, Brooks MJ (2001) Establishment of wetlands on the southeastern Atlantic Coastal Plain: paleo-limnological evidence of a mid-Holocene hydrologic thresh-hold from a South Carolina pond. J Paleolimnol 26:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaiser EE, Wachnicka A, Ruiz P, Tobias FA, Ross MS (2004a) Diatom indicators of ecosystem change in coastal wetlands. In: Bortone S (ed) Estuarine indicators. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 127–144Google Scholar
  21. Gaiser EE, Brooks MJ, Kenney W, Schelske CL, Taylor BE (2004b) Interpreting the hydrologic history of a temporary pond using siliceous subfossils. J Paleolimnol 31:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaiser EE, Richards JH, Trexler JC, Jones RD, Childers DL (2006a) Periphyton responses to eutrophication in the Florida Everglades: cross-system patterns of structural and compositional change. Limnol Oceanogr 51:617–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaiser EE, Zafiris A, Ruiz PL, Tobias F, Ross MS (2006b) Tracking rates of ecotone migration due to salt-water encroachment using fossil mollusks in coastal South Florida. Hydrobiologia 569:237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaiser EE, McCormick PV, Hagerthey SE (2010) Landscape patterns of periphyton in the Florida Everglades. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(S1):92–120Google Scholar
  25. Gaiser EE, Trexler JC, Wetzel PR (2012) Chapter 17: The florida everglades. In: Batzer D, Baldwin A (eds) Wetland habitats of north America: ecology and conservation concerns. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 231–252Google Scholar
  26. Gleason PJ, Stone P (1994) Age, origin, and landscape evolution of the Everglades peatland. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray BeachGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottlieb A, Richards JH, Gaiser EE (2005) The effects of desiccation resistance and rewetting on the community structure of Everglades periphyton. Aquat Bot 82:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gottlieb AD, Richards JH, Gaiser EE (2006) Comparative study of periphyton community structure in long and short hydroperiod Everglades marshes. Hydrobiologia 569:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grimm EC (1987) CONISS: a FORTRAN 77 program for stratigraphically constrained cluster analysis by the method of incremental sum of squares. Computers & Geosciences 13:13–35Google Scholar
  30. Hagerthey SE, Bellinger BJ, Wheeler K, Gantar M, Gaiser E (2011) Everglades periphyton: a biogeochemical perspective. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:309–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harvey JW, Schaffranek RW, Noe GB, Larsen LG, Nowacki DJ, O’Connor BL (2009) Hydroecological factors governing surface water flow on a low-gradient floodplain. Water Resour Res 45:W03421. doi:10.1029/2008WR007129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hasle G, Fryxell G (1970) Diatoms: cleaning and mounting for light and electron microscopy. Trans Am Microsci Soc 89:470–474Google Scholar
  33. Haug GH, Hughen KH, Sigman DM, Peterson LC, Roehl U (2001) Southward migration of the intertropical convergence zone through the Holocene. Science 293:1304–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Juggins S (2003) C2 User guide: software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualization. University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Light SS, Dineen JW (1994) Water control in the Everglades: a historical perspective. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucy Press, Delray BeachGoogle Scholar
  36. Lodge TE (2010) The Everglades handbook: understanding the ecosystem, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  37. Madella, M, Alexandre A, Ball T (2005) International code for phytolith nomenclature 1.0. ICPN working group. Published on-line at http://www.phytolithsociety.org/international-committee-on-.html
  38. Moses CS, Anderson WT, Saunders CJ, and Sklar FH (in press) Local and regional gradients in precipitation and temperature in response to climate teleconnections in South Florida. J PaleolimnolGoogle Scholar
  39. Pearlstine L, Higer A, Palaseanu M, Fujisaki I, Mazzotti F (2007) Spatially continuous interpolation of water stage and water depths using the everglades depth estimation network (EDEN). Gainesville, FL, Institute of Food and Agriculture, University of Florida, CIR 1521, 2 apps, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  40. Peterson LC, Haug GH (2006) Variability in the mean latitude of the Atlantic Intertropical Convergence Zone as recorded by riverine input of sediments to the Cariaco Basin (Venezuela). PalaeogeogrPalaeoclimPalaeoecol 234:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piperno D (2006) Phytoliths. AltaMira Press, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  42. Price RM, Swart PK, Fourqurean JW (2006) Coastal groundwater discharge—an additional source of phosphorus for the oligotrophic wetlands of the Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. RECOVER 2010 (2009) Comprehensive Everglades restoration plan system status report. SFWMD, West Palm BeachGoogle Scholar
  44. Ross MS, Mitchell-Bruker S, Sah JP, Stothoff S, Ruiz PL, Reed DL, Jayachandran K, Coultas CL (2006) Interaction of hydrology and nutrient limitation in the Ridge and Slough landscape of the southern Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569:37–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saunders CJ, Gao M, Lynch J, Jaffe R, Childers DL (2006) Using soil profiles of seeds and molecular markers as proxies for sawgrass and wet prairie slough vegetation in Shark Slough, Everglades National Park. Hydrobiologia 569:475–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saunders CJ, Jaffe R, Gao M, Anderson W, Lynch JA, Childers D (2008) Decadal to millennial dynamics of ridge-and-slough wetlands in Shark Slough, Everglades National Park: integrating paleoecological data and simulation modeling. National Park Service, Miami, p 78Google Scholar
  47. Science Coordination Team (2003) The role of flow in the Everglades ridge and slough landscape. South Florida ecosystem restoration working group. Available at: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/sct_flows/
  48. Sklar FC, Chimney MJ, Newman S, McCormick P, Gawlik D, Miao S, McVoy C, Said W, Newman J, Coronado C, Crozier G, Korvela M, Rutchey K (2005) The ecological–societal underpinnings of Everglades restoration. Front Ecol Environ 3:161–169Google Scholar
  49. Slate JE, Stevenson RJ (2000) Recent and abrupt environmental change in the Florida Everglades indicated from siliceous subfossils. Wetlands 20:346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slate JE, Stevenson RJ (2007) The diatom flora of phosphorus-enriched and unenriched sites in an Everglades marsh. Diatom Res 22:355–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smol JP, Birks HJB, Last WM (2001) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments volume 3: terrestrial, algal, and siliceous indicators. Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 371–678Google Scholar
  52. Snyder GH, Davidson JM (1994) Everglades agriculture: past, present, and future. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 85–115Google Scholar
  53. Struyf E, Conley DJ (2009) Silica: an essential nutrient in wetland biogeochemistry. Front Ecol Environ 7:88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tobias FA, Gaiser EE (2006) Taxonomy and distribution of taxa in the genus Gomphonema from the Florida Everglades, U.S.A. Diatom Res 21:379–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Volkmer-Ribeiro C, de Machado VS (2009) Freshwater sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae) in a benthic filter feeding community at the Guanacaste Dry Forest, Costa Rica. Iheringia, SérZool, Porto Alegre 99(4):335–344Google Scholar
  56. Wachnicka A, Collins S, Gaiser E (in press) Response of diatom assemblages to ~130 years of environmental change in Florida Bay (U.S.A.). J PaleolimnolGoogle Scholar
  57. Willard DA, Holmes CW, Weimer LM (2001) The Florida ecosystem: climatic and anthropogenic impacts over the last two millennia. Bull Am Paleontol 361:41–55Google Scholar
  58. Willard DA, Bernhardt CE, Korejwo DA, Meyers SR (2005) Impact of millennial-scale Holocene climate variability on eastern North American terrestrial ecosystems: pollen based climatic reconstruction. Glob Planet Change 47:17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Willard DA, Bernhardt CE, Holmes CW, Landacre B, Marot M (2006) Response of Everglades tree islands to environmental change. Ecol Monogr 76:565–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winkler MG, Sanford PR, Kaplan SW (2001) Hydrology, vegetation, and climate change in the Southern Everglades during the Holocene. In: Wardlaw BR (ed) Bull Am Paleontol 361: 57–98Google Scholar
  61. Zeeb BA, Smol JP (2001) Chrysophyte scales and cysts. In: Smol JP, Birks HJB, Last WM (eds) Tracking Environmental change using lake sediments. Terrestrial, algal, and siliceous indicators, vol 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 180 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Sanchez
    • 1
  • Evelyn E. Gaiser
    • 2
  • Colin J. Saunders
    • 3
  • Anna H. Wachnicka
    • 4
  • Nicholas Oehm
    • 1
  • Christopher Craft
    • 5
  1. 1.Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research ProgramFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  3. 3.South Florida Water Management DistrictWest Palm BeachUSA
  4. 4.Southeast Environmental Research CenterFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  5. 5.School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations