Advertisement

Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 251–275 | Cite as

Multi-indicator conductivity transfer functions for Quaternary palaeoclimate reconstruction

  • Jane M. ReedEmail author
  • Francesc Mesquita-Joanes
  • Huw I. Griffiths
Original paper

Abstract

Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae; single-celled algae) and ostracods (Ostracoda; shelled microcrustacea) are known for their sensitivity to salinity. In palaeolimnology, the potential has yet to be tested for quantifying past salinity, lake level, and by inference, climate change, by application of multiple-indicator transfer functions. We used weighted averaging techniques to derive diatom (n = 91; r 2  = 0.92) and ostracod (n = 53; r 2  = 0.83) conductivity transfer functions from modern diatom, ostracod and water chemistry data collected in lakes of central, western and northern Turkey. Diatoms were better represented across the full gradient than ostracods, at intermediate levels of conductivity in particular, but both transfer functions were statistically robust. Because transfer functions are not infallible, we further tested the strength and simplicity of salinity response and the potential for identifying characteristic associations of diatom and ostracod taxa in different parts of the salinity gradient, to improve palaeoclimate reconstruction. We identified a subset of 51 samples that contained both diatoms and ostracods, collected at the same time from the same habitat. We used Two-Way Indicator Species Analysis of a combined diatom-ostracod data set, transformed to achieve numerical equivalence, to explore distributions in more detail. A clear ecological threshold was apparent at ~3 g l−1 salinity, rather than at 5 g l−1, the boundary used by some workers, equating to the oligosaline-mesosaline boundary. Other salinity boundaries were poorly defined, indicating lack of a simple, well-defined salinity response. We did, however, define characteristic associations of taxa, to facilitate the distinction to be drawn between a hydrologically open, fresh lake and an oligosaline lake, in palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. Over the rest of the salinity gradient, we highlighted the potential for the multi-proxy approach to strengthen ostracod-based reconstruction in particular, to overcome the problem of broad apparent tolerance ranges in common halophilic taxa such as Limnocythere inopinata, which often dominate in low-diversity fossil assemblages. The combination of multi-proxy quantitative reconstruction, complemented by qualitative understanding of ecological responses generated by the analysis, remains a powerful tool in Quaternary palaeoclimate research.

Keywords

Transfer functions Diatoms Ostracoda Conductivity Saline lakes Turkey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by a Leverhulme Special Research Fellowship to JMR, supported by Royal Society, British Council and British Institute of Archaeology, Ankara field grants. We are grateful to Phil Barker, Bob Knight and Jonathan Holmes for access to laboratory equipment. We thank Neil Roberts for encouraging JMR to carry out pilot studies as a Leverhulme and NERC research associate. Neil Roberts, Warren Eastwood, Sabri and Claire Kilinç, Selçuk and Songül Altınsaçlı helped with fieldwork. We thank Jonathan Garner for map production and Stuart McLelland for data transformation. We thank Finn Viehberg, Mark Brenner, Steffen Mischke and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments on the manuscript. We dedicate this to the memory of Huw Griffiths.

References

  1. Aboal M, Álvarez-Cobelas M, Cambra J, Ector L (2003) Floristic list of the non marine diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) of Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands and Canary Islands. Diatom Monographs Vol 4. ARG Gantner Verlag, RuggellGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbulut A, Dügel M (2008) Planktonic diatom assemblages and their relationship to environmental variables in lakes of Salt Lake Basin (Central Anatolia-Turkey). Fresenius Environ Bull 17:154–163Google Scholar
  3. Altınsaçlı S, Griffiths HI (2001) Ostracoda (Crustacea) from the Turkish Ramsar site of Lake Kuş (Manyas Gölü). Aquat Conserv 11:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battarbee RW (1986) Diatom analysis. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of Holocene palaeoecology and palaeohydrology. Wiley, London, pp 527–570Google Scholar
  5. Bronshtein ZS (1947) Fresh-water Ostracoda. Fauna of the USSR. Crustaceans vol 2, no 1 (1988 English ed). Amerind Publishing Co, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  6. Flower RJ, Jones VJ, Round FE (1996) The distribution and classification of the problematic Fragilara (virescens v.) exigua Grun./Fragilaria exiguiformis (Grun.) Lange-Bertalot: a new species or a new genus? Diatom Res 11:41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franz SO, Schwark L, Brüchmann C, Scharf B, Klingel R, Van Alstine JD, Çagatay N, Űlgen UB (2006) Results from a multi-disciplinary sedimentary pilot study of tectonic Lake Iznik (NW Turkey)–geochemistry and paleolimnology of the recent past. J Paleolimnol 35:715–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fritz SC, Cumming BF, Gasse F, Laird K (2010) Diatoms as indicators of hydrologic and climatic change in saline lakes. In: Stoermer EF, Smol JP (eds) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 186–208Google Scholar
  9. Gasse F, Fontes JC, Plaziat JC, Carbonel P, Kaczmarska I, de Deckker P, Soulié-Märsche I, Callot Y, Dupeuple PA (1987) Biological remains, geochemistry and stable isotopes for the reconstruction of environmental and hydrological changes in the Holocene lakes from North Sahara. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 60:1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gasse F, Juggins S, Ben Khelifa L (1995) Diatom-based transfer functions for inferring past hydrochemical characteristics of African lakes. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 117:31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gasse F, Barker P, Gell PA, Fritz SC, Chalié F (1997) Diatom-inferred salinity in palaeolakes: an indirect tracer of climate change. Quat Sci Rev 16:547–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Girgin S, Kazancı N, Dügel M (2004) On the limnology of deep and saline lake Burdur in Turkey. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 32:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glew JR (1991) Miniature gravity corer for recovering short sediment cores. J Paleolimnol 5:285–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths HI, Holmes JA (2000) Non-marine ostracods and Quaternary environments. Technical guide No. 8. Quaternary Research Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Herbst DB (2001) Gradients of salinity stress, environmental stability and water chemistry as a templet for defining habitat types and physiological strategies in inland salt waters. Hydrobiologia 466:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill MO (1979) TWINSPAN-A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way system by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoelzmann P, Schwalb A, Roberts N, Burgess A (2010) Hydrological response of an east-Saharan palaeolake (NW Sudan) to early-Holocene climate. Holocene 20:537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janz H (1994) Zur Bedeutung des Schalenmerkmals ‘Marginalrippen’ der Gattung Ilyocypris (Ostracoda, Crustacea). Stuttgarter Beitr Naturk B 206:1–19Google Scholar
  19. Jones VJ, Juggins S (1995) The construction of a diatom-based nutrient transfer function and its application at three lakes on Signy Island (maritime Antarctic) subject to differing degrees of nutrient enrichment. Freshw Biol 34:433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juggins S (2007) C2 version 1.5: software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualisation [program]. University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
  21. Juggins S (2011) The European diatom database. Available at http://craticula.ncl.ac.uk/Eddi/jsp/. Accessed 2001–2011
  22. Kashima K (1996) Sedimentary diatom assemblages in freshwater and saline lakes of the Anatolia Plateau, central part of Turkey: an application for reconstruction of palaeosalinity change during Late Quaternary. Proceedings of 13th International diatom symposium, Biopress, Bristol, pp 93–100Google Scholar
  23. Kienel U, Kumke T (2002) Combining ordination techniques and geostatistics to determine the patterns of diatom distributions at Lake Lama, Central Siberia. J Paleolimnol 28:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1986–2000) Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Bacillariophyceae. Teils 1-5. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  25. Külköylüoğlu O (2004) On the usage of ostracods (Crustacea) as bioindicator species in different aquatic habitats in the Bolu region, Turkey. Ecol Indic 4:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Levkov Z, Krstic S, Metzeltin D, Nakov T (2007) Diatoms of Lakes Prespa and Ohrid. About 500 taxa from ancient lake system. Iconographia Diatomologica, vol 16. ARG Gantner Verlag, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. Lotter AF, Birks HJB, Hofmann W, Marchetto A (1997) Modern diatom, cladocera, chironomid, and chrysophyte cyst assemblages as quantitative indicators for the reconstruction of past environmental conditions in the Alps. I. Climate. J Paleolimnol 18:395–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markgraf V, Bradbury JP, Schwalb A, Burns SJ, Stern C, Ariztegui D, Gilli A, Anselmetti FS, Stern S, Maidana N (2003) Holocene palaeoclimates of southern Patagonia: limnological and environmental history of Lago Cardiel, Argentina. Holocene 13:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meisch C (2000) Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe. Süsswasserfauna von Mitteleuropa. Teil 8/3. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  31. Mezquita F, Roca JR, Reed JM, Wansard G (2005) Quantifying species-environment relationships in non-marine Ostracoda for ecological and palaeoecological studies: examples using Iberian data. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 225:93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mischke S, Herzschuh U, Massmann G, Zhang C (2007) An ostracod-conductivity transfer function for Tibetan lakes. J Paleolimnol 38:509–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mischke S, Almogi-Labin A, Ortal R, Rosenfeld A, Schwab MJ, Boomer I (2010) Quantitative reconstruction of lake conductivity in the Quaternary of the Near East (Israel) using ostracods. J Paleolimnol 43:667–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mutlu H, Kadir S, Akbulut A (1999) Mineralogy and water chemistry of the Lake Acigöl, Denizli, Turkey. Carbonate evaporite 14:191–199Google Scholar
  35. Patrick R, Reimer CW (1966) Diatoms of the United States, vol 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, no 13. Lititz, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  36. Petkovski T, Scharf B, Keyser D (2000) New and little known ostracods of the genus Heterocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the Balkan Peninsula. Limnologica 30:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poquet JM, Mezquita F, Rueda J, Miracle MR (2008) Loss of Ostracoda biodiversity in Western Mediterranean wetlands. Aqua Cons Mar Freshwater Ecos 18:280–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Porter SC, Sauchyn DJ, Delorme LD (1999) The ostracode record from Harris Lake, southwestern Saskatchewan: 9200 years of local environmental change. J Paleolimnol 21:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reed JM (1998) A diatom–conductivity transfer function for Spanish salt lakes. J Paleolimnol 19:399–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reed JM (2007) The role of quantitative diatom-based palaeolimnology in environmental archaeology. In: Lillie MC, Ellis S (eds) Wetland archaeology and environments. Regional Issues, global perspectives. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 198–210Google Scholar
  41. Reed JM, Stevenson AC, Juggins S (2001) A multi-proxy record of Holocene climate change in southwestern Spain: the Laguna de Medina, Cádiz. Holocene 11:707–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reed JM, Leng MJ, Ryan S, Black S, Altınsaçlı S, Griffiths HI (2008) Recent habitat degradation in shallow, karstic Lake Uluabat, W. Turkey: a coupled limnological-palaeolimnological approach. Biol Conserv 141:2765–2783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts N, Reed JM (2009) Lakes, wetlands, and Holocene environmental change. In: Woodward JC (ed) The physical geography of the mediterranean. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 255–286Google Scholar
  44. Roberts N, Black S, Eastwood WJ, Griffiths HI, Lamb HF, Leng MJ, Parish R, Reed JM, Twigg D, Yiğitbasioğlu H (1999) Chronology and stratigraphy of Late Quaternary sediments in the Konya Basin, Turkey: results from the KOPAL project. Quat Sci Rev 18:611–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roberts N, Reed J, Leng MJ, Kuzucuoğlu C, Fontugne M, Bertaux J, Woldring H, Bottema S, Black S, Hunt E, Karabiyikoğlu M (2001) The tempo of Holocene climatic change in the eastern Mediterranean region: new high-resolution crater-lake sediment data from central Turkey. Holocene 11:721–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roca JR, Mezquita F, Rueda J, Camacho A, Miracle MR (2000) Endorheic versus karstic lakes: patterns of ostracod distributions and lake typology in a Mediterranean landscape (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). Mar Freshw Res 51:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sarı N, Külköylüoğlu O (2010) Ostracods (Crustacea) and habitat similarities in the Bolu region (Turkey). Turk J Zool 34:225–230Google Scholar
  48. Sywula T (1974) Malzoraczki (Ostracoda). Fauna Slodkowodna Polski 24:1–315Google Scholar
  49. Telford RJ, Birks HJB (2011) A novel method for assessing the statistical significance of quantitative reconstructions inferred from biotic assemblages. Quat Sci Rev 30:1272–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ter Braak CJF (1990) Update notes: CANOCO version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  51. Unal Y, Kindap T, Karaca M (2003) Redefining the climate zones of Turkey using cluster analysis. Int J Climatol 23:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Dam H, Mertens A (1993) Diatoms on herbarium macrophytes as indicators for water quality. Hydrobiologia 269–270:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verschuren D, Tibby J, Sabbe K, Roberts N (2000) Effects of depth, salinity, and substrate on the invertebrate community of a fluctuating tropical lake. Ecology 81:164–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warren JK (2006) Evaporites: sediments, resources and hydrocarbons. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitmore TJ, Brenner M, Curtis JH, Dahlin BH, Leyden BW (1996) Holocene climatic and human influences on lakes of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico: an interdisciplinary, palaeolimnological approach. Holocene 6:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams WD, Boulton AJ, Taaffe RG (1990) Salinity as a determinant of salt lake fauna: a question of scale. Hydrobiologia 197:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Witkowski A, Lange-Bertalot H, Metzeltin D (2000) Diatom flora of marine coasts I. Iconographia Diatomologica, vol 7. ARG Gantner Verlag, RuggellGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodbridge J, Roberts N (2010) Linking neo- and palaeolimnology: a case study using crater lake diatoms from central Turkey. J Paleolimnol 44:855–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Meteorological Organisation (2001) Regional Basic synoptic network (RBSN). http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/ois/rbsn-rbcn/rbsn-rbcn-home.htm. Accessed July 2001
  60. Yin Y, Geiger W, Martens K (1999) Effects of genotype and environment on phenotypic variability in Limnocythere inopinata (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia 400:85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane M. Reed
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesc Mesquita-Joanes
    • 2
  • Huw I. Griffiths
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of HullHullUK
  2. 2.Dep. Microbiologia i Ecologia, Fac. BiologiaUniv. ValènciaBurjassotSpain
  3. 3.HullUK

Personalised recommendations