Historic primary producer communities linked to water quality and hydrologic changes in the northern Everglades
- 362 Downloads
The northern Everglades Water Conservation Areas have experienced recent ecological shifts in primary producer community structure involving marl periphyton mats and dense Typha-dominated macrophyte stands. Multiple investigations have identified phosphorus (P) as a driver of primary producer community structure, but effects of water impoundment beginning in the 1950s and changes in water hardness [e.g., (CaCO3)] have also been identified as a concern. In an effort to understand pre-1950, primary producer community structure and identify community shifts since 1950, we measured pigment proxies on three sediment cores collected in Water Conservation Area-2A (WCA-2A) along a phosphorus enrichment gradient. Photosynthetic pigments, sediment total phosphorus content (TP), organic matter, total organic carbon and nitrogen were used to infer historic primary producer communities and changes in water quality and hydrology regulating those communities. Excess 210Pb was used to establish historic dates for the sediment cores. Results indicate the northern area of WCA-2A increased marl deposition and increased algal abundance ca. 1920. This increase in (presumably) calcareous periphyton before intensive agriculture and impoundment suggest canal-derived calcium inputs and to some extent early drainage effects played a role in initiating this community shift. The northern area community then shifted to Typha dominance around 1965. The areas to the south in WCA-2A experienced increased marl deposition and algal abundance around or just prior to 1950s impoundment, the precise timing limited by core age resolution. Continued increases in algal abundance were evident after 1950, coinciding with impoundment and deepening of canals draining into WCA-2A, both likely increasing water mineral and nutrient concentrations. The intermediate site developed a Typha-dominated community ca. 1995 while the southern-most core site WCA-2A has yet to develop Typha dominance. Numerous studies link sediment TP >650 mg P/kg to marsh habitat degradation into Typha-dominance. The northern and intermediate cores where Typha is currently support this previous research by showing a distinct shift in the sediment record to Typha dominance corresponding to sediment TP between 600 and 700 mg P/kg. These temporal and spatial differences are consistent with modern evidence showing water-column gradients in mineral inputs (including Ca, carbonates, and phosphorus) altering primary producer community structure in WCA-2A, but also suggest hydroperiod has an effect on the mechanisms regulating periphyton development and Typha dominance.
KeywordsFlorida Everglades Paleoecology Photosynthetic pigments Phosphorus Marl
This research was funded by the South Florida Water Management District. Phosphorus was analyzed at the University of Florida Land Use and Environmental Change Institute (LUECI) with the help of William Kenney. Organic carbon and nitrogen were analyzed at Florida State University, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory by Drs. Xu and Wang. Christian Sanders assisted with core collection, and Biliana Ivanova assisted with core collection, core sectioning, sample preparations and 210Pb analysis. This material is also based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation-funded FCE-LTER program under Grant No. DEB-9910514.
- Browder JA, Gleason PJ, Swift DR (1994) Periphyton in the Everglades: spatial variation, environmental correlates, and ecological implications. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 379–418Google Scholar
- Davis SM (1994) Phosphorus inputs and vegetation sensitivity in the Everglades. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 357–378Google Scholar
- Gleason PJ, Spackman W (1974) Calcareous periphyton and water chemistry in the Everglades. In: Gleason PJ (ed) Environments of South Florida: present and past II. Miami Geological Society, Coral Gables, pp 146–181Google Scholar
- Light SS, Dineen JW (1994) Water control in the Everglades: a historical perspective. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 47–84Google Scholar
- McCormick PV, Newman S, Miao S, Gawlik DE, Marley D, Reddy KR, Fontaine TD (2002) Effects of anthropogenic phosphorus inputs on the Everglades. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The Everglades, Florida Bay and coral reefs of the Florida keys. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 83–126Google Scholar
- Noe GB, Childers DL, Edwards AL, Gaiser EE, Jayachandran K, Lee D, Meeder J, Richards J, Scinto LJ, Trexler JC, Jones RD (2002) Short-term changes in phosphorus storage in an oligotrophic Everglades wetland ecosystem receiving experimental nutrient enrichment. Biogeochemistry 59:239–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schelske CL, Lowe EF, Battoe LE, Brenner M, Coveney MF, Kenney WF (2005) Abrupt biological response to hydrologic and land-use changes in Lake Apopka, Florida, USA. Ambio 34:192–198Google Scholar
- Snyder GH, Davidson JM (1994) Everglades agriculture: past, present, and future. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 85–115Google Scholar
- US Army Corps of Engineers (1999) Central and Southern Florida comprehensive review study. Final integrated feasibility report and programmatic environmental impact statement. United States Army Corps of Engineers, JacksonvilleGoogle Scholar
- Willard DA, Holmes CW, Weimer LW (2001). The Florida Everglades ecosystem: climatic and anthropogenic impacts over the last two millennia. In: Wardlaw BR (ed) Bulletins of American Paleontology, vol 361, pp 41–55Google Scholar