Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 287–306 | Cite as

The potential for paleolimnology to determine historic sediment delivery to rivers

  • I. D. L. Foster
  • A. L. Collins
  • P. S. Naden
  • D. A. Sear
  • J. I. Jones
  • Y. Zhang
Original paper

Abstract

Establishment of water quality criteria to guide catchment sediment management is required by the European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive. The topic, however, is hotly contested among scientists and policy makers. Existing legislation with regard to fine sediment was set by the EU Freshwater Fish Directive. Its guideline, i.e. mean annual suspended sediment concentration, is 25 mg l−1. Such a static target fails to capture the episodic nature of sediment transport. Furthermore, application of such global standards is inappropriate for a pollutant that is strongly controlled by spatial variation in key catchment drivers. Paleolimnology offers an approach for assessing background sediment pressures on watercourses, enabling determination of values for times pre-dating agricultural intensification. We propose that Modern Background Sediment Delivery to Rivers (MBSDR) across England and Wales can be determined using paleolimnology to quantify maximum feasible sediment reduction. No management programme should aim to reduce sediment loss to values below those resulting from background, natural physiographic and/or hydrological controls. Lacking generic tools to quantify process linkages between sediment pressures and biological impact, we propose that MBSDR could be taken to represent ecological demand for sediment inputs into watercourses required to support healthy aquatic habitats. In situations where generic tools exist for coupling sediment pressures and ecological impacts, assessment of MBSDR could be used to correct the gap between current or future projected sediment loss and biological condition. Existing paleolimnological data on sediment yields across England and Wales are presented to illustrate the approach and provide preliminary national estimates of MBSDR. We briefly consider the basis for reconstructing sediment yields using a paleolimnological approach and analyse temporal trends in published sediment yield, inferred for a range of landscape types. We also attempt to correlate sediment accumulation rates (SARs) with sediment yields to extend the MBSDR data base. Preliminary maps were generated to identify regions where further sediment yield data are needed to produce a more robust estimate of the spatial distribution of MBSDR across England and Wales.

Keywords

EU Water Framework Directive Background sediment delivery Sediment yield reconstruction Water policy Sediment management 

References

  1. Barlow DN, Thompson R (2000) Holocene sediment erosion in Britain as calculated from lake-basin studies. In: Foster IDL (ed) Tracers in geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 155–472Google Scholar
  2. Bennion H, Battarbee R (2007) The European Union water framework directive: opportunities for palaeolimnology. J Paleolimnol 38:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brazier R (2004) Quantifying soil erosion by water in the UK: a review of monitoring and modelling approaches. Prog Phys Geogr 28:340–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butcher DP, Labadz JC, Potter AWR, White P (1993) Reservoir sedimentation rates in the Southern Pennine region, UK. In: McManus J, Duck RW (eds) Geomorphology and sedimentology of lakes and reservoirs. Wiley, Chichester, pp 73–93Google Scholar
  5. Chiverrell RC, Oldfield F, Appleby PG, Barlow D, Fisher E, Thompson R, Wolff G (2008) Evidence for changes in Holocene sediment flux in Semer Water and Raydale, North Yorkshire, UK. Geomorphology 100:70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke S, Wharton G (2001) Sediment nutrient characteristics and aquatic macrophytes in lowland English rivers. Sci Total Environ 266:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins AL, Anthony SG (2008) Assessing the likelihood of catchments across England and Wales meeting ‘good ecological status’ due to sediment contributions from agricultural sources. Environ Sci Pol 11:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins AL, Walling DE, Leeks GJL (2005) Storage of fine grained sediment and associated contaminants within the channels of lowland permeable catchments in the UK. IAHS Publ 291:259–268Google Scholar
  9. Collins AL, Naden PS, Sear DA, Jones JI, Foster IDL, Morrow K (2011) Sediment targets for informing river catchment management: international experience and prospects. Hydrol Process. doi:10.1002/hyp.7965
  10. Cooper DM, Naden P, Old G, Laize C (2008) Development of guideline sediment targets to support management of sediment inputs into aquatic systems. Natural England Research Report NERR008. Natural England, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  11. David C, Dearing J, Roberts N (1998) Land-use history and sediment flux in a lowland lake catchment: Groby Pool, Leicestershire, UK. Holocene 8:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Vente J, Poesen J, Arabkhedri M, Verstraeten G (2007) The sediment delivery problem revisited. Prog Phys Geogr 31:155–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dearing JA (1992) Sediment yields and sources in a Welsh upland lake-catchment during the past 800 years. Earth Surf Proc Land 17:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dearing JA, Foster IDL (1993) Lake sediments and geomorphological processes; some thoughts. In: McManus J, Duck RW (eds) Geomorphology and sedimentology of lakes and reservoirs. Wiley, Chichester, pp 5–14Google Scholar
  15. Dearing JA, Elner JK, Happey-Wood CM (1981) Recent sediment flux and erosional processes in a Welsh Upland Lake Catchment based on magnetic susceptibility measurements. Quat Res 16:356–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dearing JA, Jones RT, Shen J, Yang X, Boyle JF, Foster GC, Crook DS, Elvin MJD (2008) Using multiple archives to understand past and present climate–human–environment interactions: the lake Erhai catchment, Yunnan Province, China (invited Deevey and Frey Review Article). J Paleolimnol 40:3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Defra (2005) Controlling soil erosion. A manual for the assessment and management of agricultural land at risk of water erosion in lowland England. Revised: 2005. Defra publications. Product code PB4093. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards KJ, Whittington G (2001) Lake sediments, erosion and landscape change during the Holocene in Britain and Ireland. Catena 42:143–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Environment Agency (2008) Water for life. A consultation on the draft river basin management plan Thames river basin district. UK Environment Agency, BristolGoogle Scholar
  20. European Union (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 on establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Union L327:1–72Google Scholar
  21. European Union (2006) Directive 2006/44/EC the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the quality of fresh waters needing protection or improvement in order to support fish life. Off J Eur Union L264:20–31Google Scholar
  22. Evans R (1990) Soils at risk of accelerated erosion in England and Wales. Soil Use Manage 6:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster IDL (ed) (2000) Tracers in geomorphology. Wiley ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  24. Foster IDL (2006) Lakes and reservoirs in the sediment delivery system: reconstructing sediment yields. In: Owens PN, Collins AJ (eds) Soil Erosion and sediment redistribution in river catchments. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 128–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foster IDL (2010) Lakes and reservoirs in the sediment cascade. In: Burt TP, Allison RJ (eds) Sediment cascades: an integrated approach. Wiley, Chichester, pp 345–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foster IDL, Lees JA (1999) Changing headwater suspended sediment yields in the LOIS catchments over the last century: a palaeolimnological approach. Hydrol Process 13:1137–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foster IDL, Walling DE (1994) Using reservoir deposits to reconstruct changing sediment yields and sources in the catchment of the Old Mill Reservoir, South Devon, UK, over the past 50 years. Hydrol Sci J 39:347–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foster IDL, Dearing JA, Simpson A, Carter AD, Appleby PG (1985) Lake catchment based studies of erosion and denudation in the Merevale Catchment, Warwickshire, UK. Earth Surf Process Landf 10:45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foster IDL, Dearing JA, Appleby PG (1986) Historical trends in catchment sediment yields: a case study in reconstruction from lake-sediment records in Warwickshire, UK. Hydrol Sci J 31:427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foster IDL, Dearing JA, Grew R (1988) Lake-catchments: an evaluation of their contribution to studies of sediment yield and delivery processes. IAHS Publ 174:413–424Google Scholar
  31. Foster IDL, Dearing JA, Grew R, Orend K (1990) The sedimentary data base; an appraisal of lake and reservoir sediment based studies of sediment yield. IAHS Publ 189:19–43Google Scholar
  32. Foster IDL, Chapman AS, Hodgkinson RM, Jones AR, Lees JA, Turner SE, Scott M (2003) Changing suspended sediment and particulate loads and pathways in underdrained lowland agricultural catchments, Herefordshire and Worcestershire, UK. Hydrobiologia 494:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Foster IDL, Mighall TM, Proffitt H, Walling DE, Owens PN (2006) Post-Depositional 137Cs Mobility in the sediments of three Shallow Coastal Lagoons, SW England. J Paleolimnol 35:881–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fuller RM, Smith GM, Sanderson JM, Hill RA, Thomson AG (2002) The UK Land Cover Map 2000: construction of a parcel-based vector map from satellite images. Cartogr J 39:15–25Google Scholar
  35. Grieg SM, Sear DA, Carling PA (2005) The impact of fine sediment accumulation on the survival of incubating salmon progeny: implications for sediment management. Sci Total Environ 344:241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gruszowski KE, Foster IDL, Lees JA, Charlesworth SM (2003) Sediment sources and transport pathways in a rural catchment, Herefordshire, UK. Hydrol Process 17:2665–2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heathwaite AL, Burt TP (1992) The evidence for past and present erosion in the Slapton catchment, southwest Devon. In: Bell M, Boardman J (eds) Past and present soil erosion. Archaeological and geographical perspectives. Oxbow Monograph 22. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 89–100Google Scholar
  38. Holliday VJ, Warburton J, Higgitt DL (2008) Historic and contemporary sediment transfer in an upland Pennine catchment, UK. Earth Surf Process Landf 33:2139–2155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson DL (2000) Guidance on the interpretation of the biodiversity broad habitat classification (terrestrial and freshwater types): definitions and the relationship with other habitat classifications. Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No 307. JNCC, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  40. Macklin MG, Jones AF, Lewin J (2009) River response to rapid Holocene environmental change: evidence and explanation in British catchments. Quat Sci Rev 29:1555–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mackney D, Hodgson JM, Hollis JM, Staines SJ (1983) Legend for the 1:250 000 Soil map of England and Wales. Soil Survey of England and Wales, HarpendenGoogle Scholar
  42. Oldfield F (1977) Lakes and their drainage basins as units of sediment based ecological study. Prog Phys Geogr 1:460–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Sullivan PE, Coard MA, Pickering DA (1982) The use of laminated lake sediments in the estimation and calculation of erosion rates. IAHS Publ 137:385–396Google Scholar
  44. Oldfield F, Appleby PG, Van Der Post KD (1999) Problems of core correlation, sediment source ascription and yield estimation in Ponsonby Tarn, West Cumbria, UK. Earth Surf Process Landf 24:975–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pittam NJ, Foster IDL, Mighall TM (2009) An integrated lake-catchment approach for determining sediment source changes at Aqualate Mere, Central England. J Paleolimnol 42:215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pollard P, Huxham M (1998) The European water framework directive: a new era in the management of aquatic ecosystem health? Aquat Conserv 8:773–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richards C, Bacon KL (1994) Influence of fine sediment on macroinvertebrate colonization of surface and hyporheic stream substrates. Great Basin Nat 54:106–113Google Scholar
  48. Rose NL, Morley D, Appleby PG, Battarbee RW, Alliksaar T (2010) Sediment accumulation rates in European lakes since AD 1850: trends, reference conditions and exceedence. J Paleolimnol. doi:10.1007/s10933-010-9424-6
  49. Rowan JS, Goodwill P, Greco M (1995) Temporal variability in catchment sediment yield determined from repeated bathymetric surveys: Abbeystead Reservoir. UK Phys Chem Earth Pt B 20:199–206Google Scholar
  50. Sear DA, Frostick LB, Rollinson G, Lisle TE (2008) The significance and mechanics of fine-sediment infiltration and accumulation in gravel spawning beds. In: Sear DA, DeVries P (eds) Salmonid spawning habitat in rivers: physical controls, biological responses, and approaches to remediation. Bethesda, USA, American Fisheries Society Symposium 65, pp 149–174Google Scholar
  51. Shepherd J, Bibby P (2004). Rural and urban area classification 2004. http:/www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/nrudp.asp
  52. Smith I, Lyle A (1979) Distribution of freshwaters in Great Britain. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  53. van der Post KD, Oldfield F, Hawarth EY, Crooks PRJ, Appleby PG (1997) A record of accelerated erosion in the recent sediments of Blelham Tarn in the English Lake District. J Paleolimnol 18:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walling DE (2008) The changing sediment load of the world’s rivers. IAHS Publ 325:323–338Google Scholar
  55. Walling DE, Collins AL (2008) The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environ Sci Policy 11:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walling DE, Collins AL, Stroud R (2008) Tracing suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus sources in catchments. J Hydrol 350:274–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ward JV, Bretschko G, Brunke M, Danielpol D, Gibert J, Gonser T, Hildrew AG (1998) The boundaries of river systems: the metazoan perspective. Freshw Biol 40:531–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wood PJ, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manage 21:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang H, Rose NL (2003) Distribution of mercury in six lake sediment cores across the UK. Sci Total Environ 304:391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang H, Rose NL (2005) Temporal trends of toxic trace metals across the UK using 210Pb-dated sediment cores. Environmental Change Research Centre Report no 104. Environmental Change Research Centre, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0APGoogle Scholar
  61. Yarnell SM, Mount JF, Larsen EW (2006) The influence of relative sediment supply on riverine habitat heterogeneity. Geomorphology 80:310–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yeloff DE, Labadz JC, Hunt CO, Higgitt DL, Foster IDL (2005) Blanket peat erosion and sediment yield in an upland reservoir catchment in the southern Pennines, UK. Earth Surf Process Landf 30:717–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. D. L. Foster
    • 1
    • 6
  • A. L. Collins
    • 2
    • 4
  • P. S. Naden
    • 3
  • D. A. Sear
    • 4
  • J. I. Jones
    • 5
  • Y. Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Science and TechnologyThe University of NorthamptonNorthamptonUK
  2. 2.Soils, Crops and Water, ADAS, WoodthorneWolverhamptonUK
  3. 3.Centre for Ecology and HydrologyCrowmarsh Gifford, WallingfordUK
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity of SouthamptonHighfield, SouthamptonUK
  5. 5.School of Biological and Chemical SciencesQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  6. 6.Geography DepartmentRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations