Comparison of radiocarbon and OSL dating methods for a Late Quaternary sediment core from Lake Ulaan, Mongolia
- 653 Downloads
Both radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating methods were applied to test their suitability for establishing a chronology of arid-zone lacustrine sediments using a 5.88-m-long core drilled from Lake Ulaan, southern Mongolia. Although the radiocarbon and OSL ages agree in some samples, the radiocarbon ages are older than the corresponding OSL ages at the 550-cm depth horizon (late Pleistocene) and in the 100–300-cm interval (early to late Holocene). In the early to late Holocene, radiocarbon ages are consistently older than OSL ages by 4,100–5,800 years, and in the late Pleistocene by 2,700–3,000 years. Grain-size analysis of early to late Holocene sediments and one late Pleistocene sediment sample (550-cm depth) indicates that eolian processes were the dominant sediment-transport mechanism. Also, two late Pleistocene sediments samples (from 400- to 500-cm depths) are interpreted to have been deposited by both eolian and glaciofluvial processes. Accordingly, the radiocarbon ages that were older than the corresponding OSL ages during the Holocene seem to have been a consequence of the influx of 14C-deficient carbon delivered from adjacent soils and Paleozoic carbonate rocks by the westerly winds, a process that is also active today. In addition to the input of old reworked carbon by eolian processes, the late Pleistocene sediments were also influenced by old carbon delivered by deglacial meltwater. The results of this study suggest that when eolian sediment transport is suspected, especially in lakes of arid environments, the OSL dating method is superior to the radiocarbon dating method, as it eliminates a common ‘old-carbon’ error problem.
KeywordsRadiocarbon OSL Lacustrine sediment Arid condition Mongolia
This work was supported by the Korea Polar Research Institute Project (PE10010), the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program (RACS 2010-3007, PN10040), and partly by a SNU-SEES BK21 program.
- Fowler AJ, Gillespie R, Hedges REM (1986) Radiocarbon dating of sediments. Radiocarbon 28:441–450Google Scholar
- Karrow PF, Anderson TW (1975) Palynological study of lake sediment profiles from southwestern New Brunswick: discussion. Can J Earth Sci 12:1808–1812Google Scholar
- Lee MK, Lee YI, Lim HS, Lee JI, Yoon HI (2009) Climatic changes during the Holocene and late Pleistocene recorded in Ulaan Lake sediments, Mongolia. In: Proceedings the 64th annual meeting geological society Korea 64, p 60Google Scholar
- Olsson IU (1986) Radiometric dating. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of Holocene palaeoecology and palaeohydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 273–312Google Scholar
- Ramsey CB (2009) Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–360Google Scholar
- Rees-Jones J (1995) Optical dating of young sediments using fine-grain quartz. Anc TL 13:9–14Google Scholar
- Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, Buck CE, Burr GS, Edwards RL, Friedrich M, Grootes PM, Guilderson TP, Hajdas I, Heaton TJ, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kaiser KF, Kromer B, McCormac FG, Manning SW, Reimer RW, Richards DA, Southon JR, Talamo S, Turney CSM, van der Plicht J, Weyhenmeyer CE (2009) IntCal09 and marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years CAL BP. Radiocarbon 51:1111–1150Google Scholar
- Schidlowski M, Hayes JM, Kaplan IR (1983) Isotopic inferences of ancient biochemistries: carbon, sulfur, hydrogen and nitrogen. In: Schopf JW (ed) Earth’s earliest biosphere: its origin and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 149–186Google Scholar
- Sutherland DG (1980) Problems of radiocarbon dating in newly deglaciated terrain: examples from the Scottish Lateglacial. In: Lowe JJ, Gray JM, Robinson JE (eds) Studies in the Lateglacial of north-west Europe. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 139–149Google Scholar
- Turner JV, Fritz P, Karrow PF, Warner BG (1983) Isotopic and geochemical composition of marl lake waters and implications for radiocarbon dating of marl lake sediments. Can J Earth Sci 20:599–615Google Scholar