Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 469–488 | Cite as

The use of diatom records to establish reference conditions for UK lakes subject to eutrophication

Original paper

Abstract

A knowledge of pre-disturbance conditions is important for setting realistic restoration targets for lakes. For European waters this is now a requirement of the European Council Water Framework Directive where ecological status must be assessed based on the degree to which present day conditions deviate from reference conditions. Here, we employ palaeolimnological techniques, principally inferences of total phosphorus from diatom assemblages (DI-TP) and classification of diatom composition data from the time slice in sediment cores dated to ~1850 AD, to define chemical and ecological reference conditions, respectively, for a range of UK lake types. The DI-TP results from 169 sites indicate that reference TP values for low alkalinity lakes are typically <10 μg L−1 and in many cases <5 μg L−1, whilst those for medium and high alkalinity lakes are in the range 10–30 and 20–40 μg L−1, respectively. Within the latter two alkalinity types, the deeper waters (>3 m mean depth) generally had lower reference TP concentrations than the shallow sites. A small group of shallow marl lakes had concentrations of ~30 μg L−1. Cluster analysis of diatom composition data from 106 lakes where the key pressure of interest was eutrophication identified three clusters, each associated with particular lake types, suggesting that the typology has ecological relevance, although poor cross matching of the diatom groups and the lake typology at type boundaries highlights the value of a site-specific approach to defining reference conditions. Finally the floristic difference between the reference and present day (surface sample) diatom assemblages of each site was estimated using the squared chord distance dissimilarity coefficient. Only 25 of the 106 lakes experienced insignificant change and the findings indicate that eutrophication has impacted all lake types with >50% of sites exhibiting significant floristic change. The study illustrates the role of the sediment record in determining both chemical and ecological reference conditions, and assessing deviation from the latter. Whilst restoration targets may require modification in the future to account for climate induced alterations, the long temporal perspective offered by palaeolimnology ensures that such changes are assessed against a sound baseline.

Keywords

Diatoms Eutrophication Palaeolimnology Phosphorus Reference conditions Water Framework Directive 

References

  1. Anderson NJ (1995) Using the past to predict the future: lake sediments and the modelling of limnological disturbance. Ecol Model 78:149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson NJ (1997) Historical changes in epilimnetic phosphorus concentrations in six rural lakes in Northern Ireland. Freshwat Biol 38:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson NJ, Rippey B, Gibson CE (1993) A comparison of sedimentary and diatom-inferred phosphorus profiles: implications for defining pre-disturbance nutrient conditions. Hydrobiologia 253:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson NJ, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M (2005) Ecological effects of reduced nutrient loading (oligotrophication) on lakes: an introduction. Freshwat Biol 50:1589–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appleby PG, Nolan PJ, Gifford DW, Godfrey MJ, Oldfield F, Anderson NJ, Battarbee RW (1986) 210Pb dating by low background gamma counting. Hydrobiologia 141:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battarbee RW (1999) The importance of paleolimnology to lake restoration. Hydrobiologia 395(396):149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Battarbee RW, Jones VJ, Flower RJ, Cameron NG, Bennion H, Carvalho L, Juggins S (2001a) Diatoms. In: Smol JP, Birks HJB, Last WM (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Vol 3: terrestrial, algal, and siliceous indicators. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 155–202Google Scholar
  8. Battarbee RW, Juggins S, Gasse F, Anderson NJ, Bennion H, Cameron NG, Ryves DB, Pailles C, Chalie F, Telford R (2001b) European diatom database (EDDI). An information system for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. ECRC Research Report No 81, University College London, 94 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Battarbee RW, Anderson NJ, Jeppesen E, Leavitt PR (2005) Combining palaeolimnological and limnological approaches in assessing lake ecosystem response to nutrient reduction. Freshwat Biol 50:1772–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Battarbee RW, Morley D, Bennion H, Simpson GL, Hughes M, Bauere V (2010) A palaeolimnological meta-database for assessing the ecological status of lakes. J Paleolimnol (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10933-010-9417-5
  11. Bennion H (1994) A diatom-phosphorus transfer function for shallow, eutrophic ponds in south-east England. Hydrobiologia 275(6):391–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bennion H (1995) Surface sediment diatom assemblages in shallow, artificial, enriched ponds, and implications for reconstructing trophic status. Diatom Res 10:1–19Google Scholar
  13. Bennion H, Battarbee R (2007) The European union Water Framework Directive: opportunities for palaeolimnology. J Paleolimnol 38:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bennion H, Juggins S, Anderson NJ (1996a) Predicting epilimnetic phosphorus concentrations using an improved diatom-based transfer function and its application to lake eutrophication management. Environ Sci Technol 30:2004–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bennion H, Duigan CA, Haworth EY, Allott TEH, Anderson NJ, Juggins S, Monteith DM (1996b) The Anglesey lakes, Wales, UK—changes in trophic status of three standing waters as inferred from diatom transfer functions and their implications for conservation. Aquat Conserv Mar: Freshwat Ecosyst 6:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bennion H, Appleby PG, Phillips GL (2001) Reconstructing nutrient histories in the Norfolk Broads, UK: implications for the role of diatom-total phosphorus transfer functions in shallow lake management. J Paleolimnol 26:181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bennion H, Fluin J, Simpson GL (2004) Assessing eutrophication and reference conditions for Scottish freshwater lochs using subfossil diatoms. J Appl Ecol 41:124–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bennion H, Johnes P, Ferrier R, Phillips G, Haworth E (2005) A comparison of diatom phosphorus transfer functions and export coefficient models as tools for reconstructing lake nutrient histories. Freshwat Biol 50:1651–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Birks HJB (1998) Numerical tools in palaeolimnology—progress, potentialities, and problems. J Paleolimnol 20:307–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bradshaw EG, Anderson NJ (2001) Validation of a diatom-phosphorus calibration set for Sweden. Freshwat Biol 46:1035–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bradshaw EG, Nielsen AB, Anderson NJ (2006) Using diatoms to assess the impacts of prehistoric, pre-industrial and modern land-use on Danish lakes. Reg Environ Change 6:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cardoso AC, Solimini A, Premazzi G, Carvalho L, Lyche A, Rekolainen S (2007) Phosphorus reference concentrations in European lakes. Hydrobiol 584:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carpenter SR (2005) Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems: bistability and soil phosphorus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10002–10005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carrick HJ, Worth D, Marshall ML (1994) The influence of water circulation on chlorophyll-turbidity relationships in Lake Okeechobee as determined by remote-sensing. J Plankton Res 16:1117–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carvalho L, Solimini A, Phillips G, van den Berg M, Pietiläinen O-P, Lyche Solheim A, Poikane S, Mischke U (2008) Chlorophyll reference conditions for European lake types used for intercalibration of ecological status. Aquat Ecol 42:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen G, Dalton C, Leira M, Taylor D (2008) Diatom-based total phosphorus (TP) and pH transfer functions for the Irish Ecoregion. J Paleolimnol 40:143–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  28. European Union (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 20000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Commun L327:1–72Google Scholar
  29. Fozzard IR, Doughty CR, Ferrier RC, Leatherland TM, Owen R (1999) A quality classification for management of Scottish standing waters. Hydrobiologia 395(396):433–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall RI, Smol JP (1999) Diatoms as indicators of lake eutrophication. In: Stoermer EF, Smol JP (eds) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 128–168Google Scholar
  31. Holdren GC, Armstrong DE (1980) Factors affecting phosphorus release from intact sediment cores. Environ Sci Technol 14:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchinson GE (1969) Eutrophication, past and present. In: Rohlich GA (ed) Eutrophication: causes, consequences and correctives. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, pp 17–26Google Scholar
  33. Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Meerhoff M, Lauridsen TL, Jensen JP (2007) Shallow lake restoration by nutrient loading reduction—some recent findings and challenges ahead. Hydrobiologia 584:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Juggins S (2003) C2 User guide. Software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualisation. University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, 69 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Kauppila T, Moisio T, Salonen VP (2002) A diatom-based inference model for autumn epilimnetic total phosphorus concentration and its application to a presently eutrophic boreal lake. J Paleolimnol 27:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lotter AF, Birks HJB, Hofmann W, Marchetto A (1998) Modern diatom, cladocera, chironomid, and chrysophyte cyst assemblages as quantitative indicators for the reconstruction of past environmental conditions in the Alps. II. Nutrients. J Paleolimnol 19:443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Minchin PR (1987) An evaluation of relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordinations. Vegetatio 71:145–156Google Scholar
  39. Moss B (1998) Shallow lakes: biomanipulation and eutrophication. SCOPE Newslett 29:45Google Scholar
  40. Moss B, McGowan S, Carvalho L (1994) Determination of phytoplankton crops by top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in a group of English lakes, the West Midland Meres. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1020–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moss B, Johnes P, Phillips G (1997) New approaches to monitoring and classifying standing waters. In: Boon PJ, Howell CL (eds) Freshwater quality: defining the indefinable. HMSO, Edinburgh, pp 118–133Google Scholar
  42. Moss B, Stephen D, Alvarezn C, Becares E, Van der Bund W, Collings SE et al (2003) The determination of ecological status in shallow lakes—a tested system (ECOFRAME) for implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Aquat Conserv Mar: Freshwat Ecosyst 13:507–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Stevens MHH (2008) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.11-5. http://cran.r-project.org/ http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/
  44. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD (1982) Eutrophication of waters: monitoring, assessment and control. Technical Report, Environmental Directorate, OECD, Paris, 154 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Overpeck JT, Webb T, Prentice IC (1985) Quantitative interpretation of fossil pollen spectra - dissimilarity coefficients and the method of modern analogs. Quatern Res 23:87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phillips G (2003) Reporting typology for Ecoregion 18, Great Britain. TAG/LTT 43, March 2003Google Scholar
  47. Phillips G, Pietiläinen O-P, Carvalho L, Solimini A, Lyche Solheim A, Cardoso AC (2008) Chlorophyll—nutrient relationships of different lake types using a large European dataset. Aquat Ecol 42:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pollard P, Huxham M (1998) The European Water Framework Directive: a new era in the management of aquatic ecosystem health? Aquat Conserv Mar: Freshwat Ecosyst 8:773–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org
  50. Roberts DW (2007) Labdsv: ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 1.3-1. http://ecology.msu.montana.edu/labdsv/R
  51. Rose NL, Harlock S, Appleby PG, Battarbee RW (1995) The dating of recent lake sediments in the United Kingdom and Ireland using spheroidal carbonaceous particle concentration profiles. The Holocene 5:328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rose NL, Morley D, Appleby PG, Battarbee RW, Alliksaar T, Guilizzoni P, Jeppesen E, Korhola A, Punning JM (2010) Sediment accumulation rates in European lakes since AD 1850: Trends, reference conditions and exceedence. J Paleolimnol (this issue). doi:10.1007/s10933-010-9424-6
  53. Sayer C (2001) Problems with the application of diatom-total phosphorus transfer functions: examples from a shallow English lake. Freshwat Biol 46:743–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simpson GL (2007a) Analogue: analogue matching and modern analogue technique transfer function models. R package version 0.5-2. http://analogue.r-forge.r-project.org/
  55. Simpson GL (2007b) Analogue methods in palaeoecology: using the analogue package. J Stat Softw 22:1–29Google Scholar
  56. Simpson GL, Shilland EM, Winterbottom JM, Keay J (2005) Defining reference conditions for acidified waters using a modern analogue approach. Environ Pollut 137:119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith VH, Joye SB, Howarth RW (2006) Eutrophication of freshwater and marine ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 51:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smol JP (2008) Pollution of lakes and rivers: a paleoenvironmental perspective, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, 383 ppGoogle Scholar
  59. Solheim AL, Gulati RD (2008) Preface: quantitative ecological responses for the Water Framework Directive related to eutrophication and acidification of European lakes. Aquat Ecol 42:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Amsinck SL (2005) Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes. J Appl Ecol 42:616–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Lauridsen T, Van Nes SCH, Roijackers R, Lammens E, Portielje R (2007) Lake restoration: successes, failures and long-term effects. J Appl Ecol 44:1095–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stoermer EF, Smol JP (eds) (1999) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Taylor D, Dalton C, Leira M, Jordan P, Chen G, León-Vintró L, Irvine K, Bennion H, Nolan T (2006) Recent histories of six productive lakes in the Irish Ecoregion based on multiproxy palaeolimnological evidence. Hydrobiologia 571:237–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. ter Braak CJF, Juggins S (1993) Weighted averaging partial least squares (WA-PLS): an improved method for reconstructing environmental variables from species assemblages. Hydrobiologia 269(270):485–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. ter Braak CJF, van Dam H (1989) Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods. Hydrobiologia 178:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vighi M, Chiaudani G (1985) A simple method to estimate lake phosphorus concentrations resulting from natural, background, loadings. Water Res 19:987–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vollenweider RA (1968) Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication of lakes and flowing waters, with particular reference to nitrogen and phosphorus as factors in eutrophication. Technical Report DAS/CSI/68 27, OECD, Paris, 159 ppGoogle Scholar
  68. Wunsam S, Schmidt R (1995) A diatom-phosphorus transfer function for Alpine and pre-alpine lakes. Mem Ist Ital Idrobiol 53:85–99Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Environmental Change Research CentreUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations