Advertisement

Journal of Paleolimnology

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 511–531 | Cite as

Does a one point sample adequately characterize the lake environment for paleoenvironmental calibration studies?

  • J. Bunbury
  • K. Gajewski
Original Paper

Abstract

A major goal of paleolimnological studies is the quantification of past environmental conditions. This is accomplished by computing transfer functions relating organism assemblages to environmental factors. The environmental data are typically comprised of a point sample of water chemistry and other environmental parameters that are collected at the same time as a surface sediment sample. We explore whether the year of sampling of the environmental variables affects the parameterization of organism-environment relations, in particular chironomids, ostracodes and diatoms. Canonical correspondence analyses revealed that the year of sampling is of secondary importance when relating the organism assemblages to environmental variables, but only with the major explanatory variables. A chironomid-inferred bottom water temperature partial least squares transfer function revealed similar performance statistics between the years. Taxon optima and tolerances were computed for both years using weighted averaging, and the results are comparable. A paired t-test computed on the proxy-inferred bottom water temperature values indicated that the results between the 2 years are not statistically different. The results of this study provide guarded optimism that the methodology of estimating transfer functions as currently applied is not entirely determined by the particular year when the data were collected, although more case studies are needed.

Keywords

Paleolimnology Calibration sets Transfer functions Canonical correspondence analysis Limnology Southwest Yukon 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Johnson, B. O’Neil, M. Vetter, S. Wilson and the students of GEG4001 (2000) for help in the field. This work was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant to Gajewski. Further funding was provided by a Northern Research Endowment Grant from the Northern Research Institute at Yukon College and Northern Scientific Training Program awards to Bunbury. We thank the staff at the Kluane Lake Research Station for their support, and the Champagne-Aishihik First Nations, the Kluane First Nations, and the White River First Nations for allowing access to their land to conduct this research. The quality of this manuscript was improved by comments from Roland Hall and an anonymous reviewer.

References

  1. Armstrong FAJ, Schindler DW (1971) Preliminary chemical characterization of waters in the Experimental Lakes Area, Northwestern Ontario. J Fish Res Board Can 28:171–187Google Scholar
  2. Barley EM, Walker IR, Kurek J, Cwynar LC, Mathewes RW, Gajewski K, Finney BP (2006) A northwest North American training set: distribution of freshwater midges in relation to air temperature and lake depth. J Palelimnol 36:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birks HJB (1995) Quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. In: Maddy D, Brew JS (eds) Statistical modelling of quaternary science data. Quaternary Research Association, Cambridge, pp 161–254Google Scholar
  4. Birks HJB (1998) Numerical tools in palaeolimnology: progress, potentialities, and problems. J Paleolimnol 20:307–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouchard G, Gajewski K, Hamilton PB (2004) Freshwater diatom biogeography in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. J Biogeogr 31:1955–1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw EG, Anderson NJ, Jensen JP, Jeppensen E (2002) Phosphorus dynamics in Danish lakes and the implications for diatom ecology and palaeoecology. Freshw Biol 47:1963–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinkhurst RO (1974) The Benthos of lakes. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. Brock TD (1985) A eutrophic lake, Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunbury J, Gajewski K (2005) Quantitative analysis of freshwater ostracode assemblages in southwestern Yukon Territory, Canada. Hydrobiologia 545:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delorme LD (1991) Ostracoda. In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, Toronto, pp 691–717Google Scholar
  11. Eggermont H, De Deyne P, Berschuren D (2007) Spatial variability of chironomid death assemblages in the surface sediments of a fluctuating tropical lake (Lake Naivasha, Kenya). J Paleolimnol, doi 10.1007/s10933-006-9075-9Google Scholar
  12. Glew JR (1991) Miniature gravity corer for recovering short sediment cores. J Paleolimnol 5:285–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Håkanson L (2004) Lakes: form and function. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton P, Gajewski K, Atkinson D, Lean D (2001) Physical and chemical limnology of lakes from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Hydrobiologia 457:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris GP, Baxter G (1996) Interannual variability in phytoplankton biomass and species composition in a subtropical reservoir. Freshw Biol 35:545–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heiri O (2004) Within-lake variability of subfossil chironomid assemblages in shallow Norwegian lakes. J Paleolimnol 32:67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchinson GE (1944) Limnological studies in Connecticut. VII. A critical examination of the supposed relationship between phytoplankton periodicity and chemical changes in lake waters. Ecology 25:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Juggins S (2003) C2 user guide. Software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualisation. University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Kattel GR, Battarbee RW, Mackay A, Birks HJB (2007) Are cladoceran fossils in lake sediment samples a biased reflection of the communities from which they are derived? J Paleolimnol, doi 10.1007/s10933-006-9073-yGoogle Scholar
  21. Köster D, Pienitz R (2006) Seasonal diatom variability and paleolimnological inferences—A case study. J Paleolimnol 35:395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearsall WH (1930) Phytoplankton in the English Lakes: I. The proportions in the waters of some dissolved substances of biological importance. J Ecol 20:306–320Google Scholar
  24. Pearsall WH (1932) Phytoplankton in the English Lakes: II. The composition of the phytoplankton in relation to dissolved substances. J Ecol 20:241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Riley GA (1939) Limnological studies in Connecticut. Ecol Monogr 9:53–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheffer VB, Robinson RA (1939) A limnological study of Lake Washington. Ecol Monogr 9:95–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schindler DW, Welch HE, Kalff J, Brunskill GJ, Kritsch N (1974) Physical and chemical limnology of Char Lake, Cornwallis Island (75° N Lat). J Fish Res Board Can 31:585–607Google Scholar
  28. Siver PA, Hamer JS (1992) Seasonal periodicity of Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae in a small New England lake: implications for paleolimnological research. J Phycol 28:186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sorvari S, Rautio M, Korhola A (2000) Seasonal dynamics of the subarctic Lake Saanajärvi in Finnish Lapland. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 27:507–512Google Scholar
  30. Talling JF (1993) Comparative seasonal changes, and inter-annual variability and stability, in a 26-year record of total phytoplankton biomass in four English lake basins. Hydrobiologia 268:65–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ter Braak CJF (1995) Ordination. In: Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (eds) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–173Google Scholar
  33. ter Braak CJF, Prentice IC (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv Ecol Res 18:271–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO for windows: software for community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Viehberg F (2006) Freshwater ostracod assemblages and their relationship to environmental variables in waters from northeast Germany. Hydrobiologia 571:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker IR (1988) Late-Quaternary Palaeoecology of Chironomidae (Diptera:Insecta) from Lake Sediments in British Columbia. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser University, BurnabyGoogle Scholar
  37. Watson SB, McCauley E, Downing JA (1997) Patterns in phytoplankton taxonomic composition across temperate lakes of differing nutrient status. Limnol Oceanogr 42:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson SE, Gajewski K (2002) Surface sediment diatom assemblages and water chemistry from 42 subarctic lakes in the southwestern Yukon and northern British Columbia, Canada. Ecoscience 9:256–276Google Scholar
  39. Wilson SE, Gajewski K (2004) Modern chironomid assemblages and their relationship to physical and chemical variables in southwest Yukon and northern British Columbia lakes. Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:446–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao Y, Sayer CD, Birks HH, Hughes M, Peglar SM (2006) Spatial representation of aquatic vegetation by macrofossils and pollen in a small shallow lake. J Paleolimnol 35:335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Laboratory for Paleoclimatology and ClimatologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations