Advertisement

The Protein Journal

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 407–415 | Cite as

Changes in the Functional Activity of Phi11 Cro Protein is Mediated by Various Ions

  • Avijit Das
  • Malabika BiswasEmail author
Article

Abstract

Phi11, a temperate bacteriophage of Staphylococcus aureus, has been found to harbor a cro repressor gene which facilitates Phi11 to adopt the lytic mode of development. The Cro protein has been found to bind very specifically to a 15-bp operator DNA, located in the Phi11 cIcro intergenic region [1]. To investigate the effects exerted by different ions upon the interaction between Cro and its cognate operator DNA, we have employed gel shift assays as well as circular dichroism spectral analysis. In this communication, we have shown that NH4 + and acetate ions better facilitated the binding of Cro with its cognate operator as compared to Na+, K+ and Li+. Interestingly, Mg2+, carbonate2− and Citrate3− have an inhibitory effect upon the binding. The effect of the said ions upon the structure of Cro was also investigated by circular dichroism and it was found that other than Citrate3− ions, none of the other ions destabilised the protein. On the other hand, Mg2+ and carbonate2− ions maintained the structure of the protein but severely hampered its functional activity. Citrate3− ions severely unfolded Cro and also inhibited its function. Considering all the data, NH4 + and acetate ions appeared to be more suitable in maintaining the biological activity of Cro.

Keywords

Bacteriophage Phi11 Cro Operator DNA Ions Gel shift assay 

Abbreviations

bp

Base pairs

O DNA

cIcro intergenic region bearing the cognate operator DNA for Phi11 Cro

His-Cro

Phi11 Cro carrying 6-histidine-tag at its N-terminal end

SDS-PAGE

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Ni–NTA

Nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid

CD

Circular dichroism

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

DMSO

Dimethyl sulfoxide

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the financial assistance from BRNS [DAE, Govt. of India] [Sanction No. 2013/37B/19/BRNS] and DST-SERB [EMR/2015/002229] to Dr. Malabika Biswas. Mr. Avijit Das is a recipient of Junior Research Fellowship from BRNS [DAE, Govt. of India]. We are also thankful to CIF, UDSC New Delhi, India for carrying out CD spectra.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Das M, Ganguly T, Bandhu A, Mondal R, Chanda PK, Jana B, Sau S (2009) Moderately thermostable phage Phi11 Cro repressor has novel DNA-binding capacity and physicochemical properties. BMB Rep 42(3):160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hatfull GF (2000) Molecular genetics of mycobacteria. ASM Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heinrich J, Velleman M, Schuster H (1995) The tripartite immunity system of phages P1 and P7. FEMS Microbiol Rev 17:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimsey HH, Waldor MK (2004) The CTX phi repressor RstR binds DNA cooperatively to form tetrameric repressor-operator complexes. J Biol Chem 279:2640–2647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koudelka AP, Hufnagel LA, Koudelka GB (2004) Purification and characterization of the repressor of the shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophage 933 W: DNA binding, gene regulation, and autocleavage. J Bacteriol 186:7659–7669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ptashne M (1986) In: Ptashne M (ed) A genetic switch gene control and phage λ. Harvard University, Cell Press & Blackwell Scientific Publications, NewYork, pp 13–47Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ptashne M, Jeffrey A, Johnson AD, Maurer R, Meyer BJ, Pabo CO, Roberts TM, Sauer RT (1980) How the λ repressor and Cro work. Cell 19(1–11):8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Susskind MM, Youderian P (1983) Bacteriophage P22 antirepressor and its control. In: Hendrix RW, Roberts JW, Stahl FW, Weisberg RA (eds) Bacteriophage P22 antirepressor and its control in lambda II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 93–121Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dodd IB, Shearwin KE, Egan JB (2005) Revisited gene regulation in bacteriophage lambda. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ogawa T, Ogawa H (1988) Organization of the early region of bacteriophage 80. J Mol Biol 202:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bachi B (1980) Physical mapping of the BglI, BglII, PstI and EcoRI restriction fragments of staphylococcal phage phi11 DNA. Mol Gen Genet 180:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown DT, Brown NC, Burlingham BT (1972) Morphology and physical properties of staphylococcus bacteriophage P11-M15. J Virol 9:664–671Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kretschmer PJ, Egan JB (1975) Genetic map of the staphylococcal bacteriophage phi11. J Virol 16:542–651Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lofdahl S, Zabielski J, Philipson P (1981) Structure and restriction enzyme maps of the circularly permuted DNA of staphylococcal bacteriophage Phi11. J Virol 37:784–794Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kenny JG, Leach S, de la Hoz AB, Venema G, Kok J, Fitzgerald GF, Nauta A, Alonso JC, van Sinderen D (2006) Characterization of the lytic-lysogenic switch of the lactococcal bacteriophage Tuc 2009. Virology 347:434–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ladero V, García P, Alonso JC, Suarez JE (2002) Interaction of the Cro repressor with the lysis/lysogeny switch of the Lactobacillus casei temperate bacteriophage A2. J Gen Virol 83:2891–2895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mandal NC, Leib M (1976) Heat-sensitive DNA-binding activity of the cI product of bacteriophage lambda. Mol Gen Genet 146:299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barkley MD, Lewis PA, Sullivan GE (1981) Ion effects on the lac repressor-operator equilibrium. Biochemistry 20:3842–3851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koblan KS, Ackers GK (1991) Cooperative protein-DNA interactions: effects of KCl on lambda cI binding to OR. Biochemistry 30:7822–7827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Relan NK, Jenuwine ES, Gumbs OH, Shaner SL (1997) Preferential interactions of the Escherichia coli LexA repressor with anions and protons are coupled to binding the recA operator. Biochemistry 36(5):1077–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alberty RA, Bock RM (1953) Alteration of the kinetic properties of an enzyme by the binding of buffer, inhibitor, or substrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 39(9):895–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bandhu A, Ganguly T, Chanda PK, Das M, Jana B, Chakrabarti G, Sau S (2009) Antagonistic effects Na and Mg on the structure, function, and stability of mycobacteriophage L1 repressor. BMB Rep 42(5):293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Misra VK, Draper DE (1998) On the role of magnesium ions in RNA stability. Biopolymers 48(2–3):113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thomas R (1954) Research on the denaturation of desoxyribonucleic acids. Biochim Biophys Acta 14(2):231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Butzow JJ, Eichhorn GL (1965) Interactions of metal ions with polynucleotides and related compounds. IV. Degradation of polyribonucleotides by zinc and other divalent metal ions. Biopolymers 3(1):95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee CY, Iandolo JJ (1986) Integration of staphylococcal phage L54a occurs by site-specific recombination: structural analysis of the attachment sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5474–5478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee CY, Iandolo JJ (1988) Structural analysis of staphylococcal bacteriophage Phi 11 attachment sites. J Bacteriol 170:2409–2411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) In molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1998) In: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Ch. 12, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Wiley, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Das M, Ganguly T, Chattoraj P, Chanda PK, Bandhu A, Lee CY, Sau S (2007) Purification and characterization of repressor of temperate S. aureus phage Phi11. J Biochem Mol Biol 40:740–748Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perez-Iratxeta C, Andrade-Navarro MA (2008) K2D2: estimation of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra. BMC Struct Biol 8:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baird GS, Zacharias DA, Tsien RY (2000) Biochemistry, mutagenesis, and oligomerization of DsRed, a red fluorescent protein from coral. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(22):11984–11989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Winter JA, Patoli B, Bunting KA (2012) DNA binding in high salt: analysing the salt dependence of replication protein A3 from the halophile haloferax volcanii. Archaea 2012:719092Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, BITS PilaniZuarinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations