The Protein Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 556–561

QHELIX: A Computational Tool for the Improved Measurement of Inter-Helical Angles in Proteins

Article

Abstract

Knowledge about the assembled structures of the secondary elements in proteins is essential to understanding protein folding and functionality. In particular, the analysis of helix geometry is required to study helix packing with the rest of the protein and formation of super secondary structures, such as, coiled coils and helix bundles, formed by packing of two or more helices. Here we present an improved computational method, QHELIX, for the calculation of the orientation angles between helices. Since a large number of helices are known to be in curved shapes, an appropriate definition of helical axes is a prerequisite for calculating the orientation angle between helices. The present method provides a quantitative measure on the irregularity of helical shape, resulting in discriminating irregular-shaped helices from helices with an ideal geometry in a large-scale analysis of helix geometry. It is also capable of straightforwardly assigning the direction of orientation angles in a consistent way. These improvements will find applications in finding a new insight on the assembly of protein secondary structure.

Keywords

Helical axis Inter-helical angle Protein structure QHELIX, computational tool 

Abbreviations

PDB

Protein data bank

NMR

Nuclear magnetic resonance

SpA

Staphylococcal protein A

Supplementary material

10930_2007_9097_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (21 kb)
ESM1 (PDF 21 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Levitt M, Chothia C (1976) Nature 261:552–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orengo CA, Todd AE, Thornton JM (1999) Curr Opin Struct Biol 9:374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Draheim JE, Gibson NJ, Cassim JY (1991) Biophys J 60:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perozo E, Cortes DM, Sompornpisut P, Kloda A, Martinac B (2002) Nature 418:942–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bansal M, Kumar S, Velavan R (2000) J Biomol Struct Dyn 17:811–819Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mezei M, Filizola M (2006) J Comput Aided Mol Des 20:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chou KC, Némethy G, Scheraga HA (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106:3161–3170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pauling L, Corey RB, Branson HR (1951) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 37:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee S, Chirikjian GS (2004) Biophys J 86:1105–1117Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kahn PC (1989a) Computers Chem 13:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kahn PC (1989b) Computers Chem 13:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chou KC, Némethy G, Scheraga HA (1983) J Phys Chem 87:2869–2881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deisenhofer J (1981) Biochemistry 20:2361–2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gouda H, Torigoe H, Saito A, Sato M, Arata Y, Shimada I (1992) Biochemistry 31:9665–9672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Starovasnik MA, Skelton NJ, O’Connell MP, Kelley RF, Reilly D, Fairbrother WJ (1996) Biochemistry 35:15558–15569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tashiro M, Tejero R, Zimmerman DE, Celda B, Nilsson B, Montelione GT (1997) J Mol Biol 272:573–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chothia C, Levitt M, Richardson D (1981) J Mol Biol 145:215–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Research Center for Women’s Diseases (RCWD)Sookmyung Women’s UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations